Note: Ranking DMUs with Infeasible Super-Efficiency DEA Models

References

  • Andersen P., Petersen N. C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. (1989) (Department of Management no.11/1989, Odense University, Denmark) Google Scholar
  • Andersen P., Petersen N. C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1261–1264LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2:429–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Thrall R. M. Classifying and characterizing efficiencies andinef ficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. Lett. (1986) 5:105–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Rousseau J. J., Semple J. H. Sensitivity andstability of efficiency classifications in data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. (1996) 7:5–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Rousseau J. J., Lewin A. Y., Seiford L. M.Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Haag S., Jaska P., Semple J. Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. Internat. J. Sys. Sci. (1992) 23:789–798CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fare R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C. A. K.Production Frontiers (1994) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lovell C. A. K., Walters L. C., Wood L. L., Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Lewin A. Y., Seiford L. M. Stratified models of education production using modified DEA and regression analysis. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 329–351Google Scholar
  • Rosseau J. J., Semple J. H. Two-person ratio efficiency games. Management Sci. (1995) 41:435–441LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seiford L. M., Thrall R. M. Recent development in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J. Econometrics (1990) 46:7–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998a) 108(1):127–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Sensitivity analysis of DEA measures for simultaneous changes in all the data. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998b) 49:1060–1071CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR (1999) 37(2):174–187Google Scholar
  • Thrall R. M. Duality classification andslacks in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 66:109–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson P. Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. (1995) 6:27–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu J. Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 81:590–596Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.