A Context-Dependent Model of the Gambling Effect

References

• Allais M. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'Ecole Américaine. Econometrica (1953) 21:503–546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand P. Are the preference axioms really rational? Theory Decision (1987) 23:189–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker J. L., Sarin R. K. Lottery dependent utility. Management Sci. (1987) 33(1367-1382Google Scholar
• Bell D. E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1982) 30:961–981Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Edwards W. Recent tests of generalizations of expected utility theory. Utility: Theories, Measurement and Applications (1992) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 207–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M., Jaffray J.-Y. Certainty effect versus probability distortion: An experimental analysis of decision making under risk. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1988) 14:554–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlisk J. The utility of gambling. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 6:255–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diecidue E., Schmidt U., Wakker P. P. The gambling effect reconsidered. (2001) . Working paper, CREED, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Sarin R. K. Relative risk aversion. Management Sci. (1982) 28:875–886Link, Google Scholar
• Farquhar P. Utility assessment methods. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1283–1300Link, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C. A simple model for the utility of gambling. Psychometrika (1980) 45:435–448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C. Non-transitive measurable utility. J. Math. Psych. (1982) 26:31–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C. Nontransitive preferences in decision theory. J. Risk Uncertainty (1991) 4:113–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gafni A., Birch S., Mehrez A. Economics, health, and health economics: HYEs versus QALYs. J. Health Econom. (1993) 12:325–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groes E., Jacobsen H. J., Sloth B., Tranæs T. Testing the intransitivity explanation of the Allais paradox. Theory Decision (1999) 47:229–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harless D., Camerer C. F. The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica (1994) 62:1251–1289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Puto C. Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effects. J. Consumer Res. (1983) 10:31–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Payne J. W., Puto C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9:90–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey S. J. More mixed results on boundary effects. Econom. Lett. (1998) 61:79–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen N. E. An introduction to Bernoullian utility theory : I. Utility functions. Scand. J. Econom. (1967) 69:163–183Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakshmi-Ratan R. A., Lanning S. G., Rotondo J. A. An aggregate contextual choice model for estimating demand for new products from a laboratory choice experiment. J. Bus. Res. (1991) 23:201–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G. C. The myth of the HYE. J. Health Econom. (1995) 14:1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G. C., Sugden R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice. Econom. J. (1982) 92:805–824Google Scholar
• Loomes G. C., Starmer C., Sugden R. Observing violations of transitivity by experimental methods. Econometrica (1991) 59:425–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce R. D. Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica (1956) 24:178–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce R. D.Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Luce R. D., Marley A. A. J. On elements of chance. Theory Decision (2000) 49:97–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon K. R., Borch K., Mossin J. Descriptive and normative implications of the decision-theorypostulates. Risk and Uncertainty (1968) (St. Martin's Press, New York) 3–23Google Scholar
• Marley A. A. J. Context dependent probabilistic choice models based on measures of binary advantage. (1991) 21:201–231Google Scholar
• McCord M., de Neufville R. Lottery equivalents: Reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment. Management Sci. (1986) 32:56–60Link, Google Scholar
• Mehrez A., Gafni A. Quality-adjusted life-years, utility theory and healthy years equivalents. Medical Decision Making (1989) 9:142–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neilson W. S. Some mixed results on boundary effects. Econom. Lett. (1992) 39:275–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J. W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1964) 32:83–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. E. Increasing risk I: A definition. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2:225–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt U. A measurement of the certainty effect. J. Math. Psych. (1998) 42:32–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt U. Lottery dependent utility: A reexamination. Theory Decision (2001) 50:35–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I., Tversky A. Choice in context: Contrast and extremeness aversion. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29:231–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sopher B., Gigliotti G. A test of generalized expected utility theory. Theory Decision (1993) 35:75–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C. Testing new theories of choice under uncertainty using the common consequence effect. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1992) 59:813–830Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory : The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature (2000) 28:332–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C., Sugden R. Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses. Ann. Oper. Res. (1989) 19:79–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugden R. Why be consistent? A critical analysis of consistencyr equirements in choice theory. Economica (1985) 52:167–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugden R. An axiomatic foundation for regret theory. J. Econom. Theory (1993) 60:159–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Additivity, utility, and subjective probability. J. Math. Psych. (1967) 4:175–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Simonson I. Context-dependent preferences. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1179–1189Link, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P.Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis (1989) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P. A criticism of healthy-years equivalents. Medical Decision Making (1996) 16:207–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P., Deneffe D. Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1131–1150Link, Google Scholar
• Wedell D. H. Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition (1991) 17:767–778Crossref, Google Scholar