What Do We Know About Variance in Accounting Profitability?
Published Online:1 Jul 2002https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.7.834.2816
References
- Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management J (2001) 22(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Schmalensee Richard, Willig Robert D. Empirical studies of industries with market power. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) 2(Elsevier Science Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
- . What does a small corporate effect mean? A variance components simulation of corporate and business effects. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(10):825–835Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Corporate and industry effects on business unit competitive position. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(7):739–752Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The misuse of accounting rates of return: Reply. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(3):508–517Google Scholar
- . On the misuse of accounting rates of return to infer monopoly profits. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73(March):82–97Google Scholar
- . Does industry matter differently in different places? A comparison of industry, corporate parent, and business segment effects in four OECD countries. (1998) . Manuscript, MIT Sloan School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- . The misuse of accounting rates of return: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(June):492–493Google Scholar
- . Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(1):45–74Crossref, Google Scholar
- Excess capacity as a barrier to entry: An empirical appraisal. J. Indust. Econom. (1987) 35(4):607–627Crossref, Google Scholar
- The misuse of accounting rates of return: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(June):494–500Google Scholar
- . The misuse of accounting rates of return: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(June):501–506Google Scholar
- Firm and industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(3):211–219Crossref, Google Scholar
- The performance of U.S. corporations: 1981–1994. J. Indust. Econom. (1999a) 67(4Crossref, Google Scholar
- Do competitors perform better when they pursue different strategies? (1999b) . Manuscript, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
- How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management J. (1997a) 18(51):15–30Crossref, Google Scholar
- The emergence and sustainability of abnormal profits. (1997b) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
- The persistence of shocks to profitability. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81(1):143–153Crossref, Google Scholar
- Profits in the Long Run. (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Reconcilable differences. (1997) . Manuscript,Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
- Markets vs. management: What “Drives” profitability? Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:653–664Crossref, Google Scholar
- How much does industry matter? Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:167–185Crossref, Google Scholar
- Linear Models (1971) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY) Google Scholar
- . Do markets differ much? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):341–351Google Scholar
- , Schmalensee R., Willig R. Inter-industry studies of structure and performance. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (North-Holland, Oxford, England) Google Scholar
- The misuse of accounting rates of return: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(June):507–508Google Scholar
- Industry differences in the persistence of firm-specific returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(5):1253–1265Google Scholar
- Tobin's q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(1):246–250Google Scholar

