The Performance Effects of Congruence Between Product Competitive Strategies and Purchasing Management Design

References

  • Balakrishnan R., Linsmeier T., Venkatachalam M. Financial benefits from JIT adoption: Effects of customer concentration and cost structure. Accounting Rev (1996) 71(2):183–206Google Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Burgelman R. A. Evolutionary perspectives on strategy. Strategic Management J (1996) 17:5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley M.Economics of Strategy (1996) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure. The History of the American Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dess G., Beard G. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:52–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G., Davis P. S. Porter's 1980 generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organization performance. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27:467–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobler D. W., Burt D. N.Purchasing and Supply Management, Text and Cases (1996) 6th ed.(The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York) Google Scholar
  • Doty H. D., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M. L. What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(March-April):105–116Google Scholar
  • Galbraith C. R., Schendel D. An empirical analysis of strategy types. Strategic Management J (1983) 4(2):153–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gale B. T. Can more capital buy higher productivity? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1980) 58(4):78–86Google Scholar
  • Govindarajan V. Decentralization, strategy and effectiveness of strategic business units in multi-business organization. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(4):844–856CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Govindarajan V. A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):828–853CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Greis N. P., Kasarda J. D. Enterprise logistics in the information era. California Management Rev (1997) 39(4):55–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Resource sharing among SBUs: Strategic antecedents and administrative implications. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:695–714CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Raj S. P., Wilemon D. A model for studying R&D marketing interface in the product development process. J. Marketing (1986) 50:7–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: A contingency approach. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:687–707CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B. Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. J. Marketing (1994) 58(1):71–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinant of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(1):24–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R., Michell W. The interactions of organizational and competitive influences on strategy and performance. Strategic Management J (1997) 18:5–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hrebiniak L. G., Joyce W. F. Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:336–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., McDaniel R. R. The decision-making paradigm of organization design. Management Sci (1986) 32(5):572–589LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Miller C. C., Glick W. H. Developing more encompassing theories about organizations: The centralization-effectiveness relationship as an example. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(1):11–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huselid M. A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):635–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ittner C. D., Larcker D. F. Product development cycle time and organization performance. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):13–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ittner C. D., Larcker D. F. Supplier selection, monitoring practices, and firm performance. J. Accounting Public Policy (1999) 18(3):253–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P.Translating Strategy into Action: The Balanced Scorecard (1996) (Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Katz D., Kahn R. L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1978) 2nd ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kim Jae-On, Mueller C. W.Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues (1978) (Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kobrin S. J. An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management J (1991) 12:17–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotha S., Nair A. Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry. Strategic Management J (1995) 16:497–518CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin A. Y., Minton J. W. Determining organization effectiveness: Another lookand an agenda for research. Management Sci (1986) 32(5):514–538LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacDuffie P. J., Helper S. Creating learn suppliers: Diffusing lean production through the supply chain. California Management Rev (1997) 39(4):118–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W. Modeling coordination in organization and market. Management Sci (1987) 33(10):1317–1332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structures: Analysis and performance implications. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(2):280–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Friesen P. H. Strategy making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management J (1983) 4:221–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Sci (1978) 24:934–948LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Noordewier T. G., John G., Nevin J. R. Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):80–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson E. M., Walker O. C., Ruekert R. W. Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. J. Marketing (1995) 59:48–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palepu K. G., Bernard V. L., Healy P. M.Business Analysis and Valuation: Using Financial Statements: Text and Cases (1996) (South- Western College Publishers, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Porter M.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter M.Competitive Advantage (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Prescott J. E. Environments as moderators of the relationship between strategy and performance. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(2):329–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajaratnam D., Chonko L. B. The effects of business strategy type on marketing organization design, product market growth strategy, relative marketing effort, and organization performance. J. Marketing-Theory and Practice (1995) 3(3):60–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramasamy K., Thomas A. S., Litschert R. Organization performance in a regulated environment: The role of strategic orientation. Strategic Management J (1994) 15:63–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reger R. K., Huff A. Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management J (1993) 14(2):104–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roger P. R., Miller A., Judge W. Q. Using information processing theory to understand planning, performance relationships in the context of strategy. Strategic Management J (1999) 20:567–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez R. Strategic fiexibility in product competition. Strategic Management J (1995) 16:135–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B. Problem with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory". Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:347–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shortell S. M., Zajac E. J. Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(4):817–832CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organization in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. Information processing as an integrating concept of organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) July):613–624Google Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:423–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts C. A., Kim K. Y., Hahn C. K. Linking purchasing to corporate competitive strategy. Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management (1995) 31(2):3–8Google Scholar
  • Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. The strategic value of buyer-supplier relationships. Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management (1998) 34(3):20–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.