On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management

References

• Abernathy W. J., Rosenbloom R. S. Parallel and sequential R&D strategies: Application of a simple model. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1968) EM-15(1):2–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambros-Ingerson J., Steel S. Integrating planning, execution and monitoring. Proc. Seventh National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (1988) AAAI-88:735–740Google Scholar
• Bell J. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: Establishing a fair and equitable value for embryonic high-tech enterprises. Venture Capital J. (2000) 40(12):33–34Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S., Krishnan V., Mahajan V. Managing new product definition in highly dynamic environments. Management Sci. (1998) 44:S50–S64Link, Google Scholar
• Brucker P., Drexl A., Moehring R. H., Neumann K., Pesch E. Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 112(1):3–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carracosa M., Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E. Using the design structure matrix to estimate product development time. Proc. DETC'98, 1998 ASME Design Engrg. Tech. Conf. (1998) Google Scholar
• Chapman C. B. A risk engineering approach to project risk management. Internat. J. Project Management (1990) 8:5–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clayton E. R., Moore L. J. PERT vs. GERT. J. Systems Management (1972) February):11–19Google Scholar
• Clemen R.Making Hard Decisions (1996) 2nd ed.(Duxbury Press, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
• Cockerham J. M. Army RTDE funding, planning and management: Total risk assessing cost estimate (TRACE) concept. Army Res. Development and Acquisition Magazine (1979) July):24–26Google Scholar
• Conrow E. H.Effective Risk Management: Some Keys to Success (2000) (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA) Google Scholar
• Cooper D. F., Chapman C. B.Risk Analysis for Large Projects: Models, Methods and Cases (1987) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G. Third-generation new product processes. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11:3–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crow J. F. The beanbag lives on. Nature (2001) 409(15Google Scholar
• De Meyer A., Loch C. H., Pich M. T. Managing project uncertainty. Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 43(2):60–68Google Scholar
• DSMCRisk Management Guide for DoD Acquisitions (1998) (Defense Systems Management College Press, Fort Belvoir, VA) Google Scholar
• Dvir D., Lipovetsky S., Shenhar A., Tishler A. In search of project classification: A non-universal approach to project success factors. Res. Policy (1998) 27:915–935Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman G. M., Tononi G.A Universe of Consciousness (2000) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby S. E. An algebra for the analysis of generalized activity networks. Management Sci. (1964) 10:494–514Link, Google Scholar
• Elsner H. A generalized network approach to the planning and scheduling of a research program. Oper. Res. (1962) 10:115–125Link, Google Scholar
• Ferreira A. G., Zerovnik J. Bounding the probability of success of stochastic methods for global optimization. Comput. Math. Appl. (1993) 25:1–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fikes R. E., Hart P. E., Nilsson N. J. Learning and executing generalized robot plans. Artificial Intelligence (1972) 3(4):251–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox B. L. Random restarting versus simulated annealing. Comput. Math. Appl. (1993) 27:33–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox B. L. Integrating and accelerating tabu search. Ann. Oper. Res. (1994) 41:47–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldratt E. M.Critical Chain (1997) (North River Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Gutierrez G. J., Kouvelis P. Parkinson's Law and its implications for project management. Management Sci. (1991) 37:990–1001Link, Google Scholar
• Hamel G., Prahalad C. K.Competing for the Future (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Heyman D. P., Sobel M. J.Stochastic Models in Operations Research (1984) II(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., MacCormack A. Developing products on Internet time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(5):108–117Google Scholar
• Jacobson S. H., Yücesan E. Performance results for generalized hill-climbing algorithms. (1998) . Working paper, INSEAD, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order (1993) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kepner Tregoe. Analysis of Potential Problems (1992) . Company brochure (in German)Google Scholar
• Leach L. Critical chain project management improves project performance. Project Management J. (1999) 30(4):39–51Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Thomke S. Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):663–678Link, Google Scholar
• Lockyer K. G.An Introduction to Critical Path Analysis (1969) (Pitman and Sons, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Lovejoy W. S. A survey of algorithmic methods for partially observed Markov decision processes. Ann. Oper. Res. (1991) 28(1–4):47–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludwig A., Möhring R. H., Stork F. A computational study on bounding the makespan distribution in stochastic project networks. (1998) . Technical Report 609-1998, Technical University, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Lynn G. S., Morone J. G., Paulson A. S. Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe-and-learn process. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(3):8–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn G. S., Mazzuca M., Morone J. G., Paulson A. S. Learning is the critical success factor in developing truly new products. Res. Tech. Management (1998) 41(3):45–51Google Scholar
• March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:1–13Link, Google Scholar
• Marcus A. A., Nichols M. L. On the edge: Heeding the warnings of unusual events. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:482–499Link, Google Scholar
• Marschak J., Radner R.Economic Theory of Teams (1972) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• McFarlan F. W. Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1981) 59(5Google Scholar
• Meredith J. R., Mantel S. J.Project Management—A Managerial Approach (1995) 3rd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Mokyr J.The Lever of Riches (1990) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Morris P. W. G., Hugh G. H.The Anatomy of Major Projects (1987) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• O′Connor G. C., Veryzer R. W. The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18:231–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olawsky D., Gini M. Deferred planning and sensor use. Proceedings, DARPA Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling, and Control (1990) (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, San Diego, CA) Google Scholar
• Plotkin H. C., Odling-Smee F. J. Learning, change and evolution: An enquiry into the teleonomy of learning. Adv. Stud. Behavior (1979) 10:1–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plotkin H. C.Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge (1993) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Pritsker A. A. B. GERT: Graphical evaluation and review technique. (1966) . Memorandum RM-4973-NASA, The Rand Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
• Pritsker A. A. B., Sigal C. E.Management Decision Making: A Network Simulation Approach (1983) (Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute Standards CommitteeA Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (2000) . (PMBOKTMGuide). Project Management Institute, Upper Darby, PAGoogle Scholar
• Russell S., Norvig P.Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (1995) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Sahlmann W. A. Insights from the venture capital model of project governance. Bus. Econom. (1994) 29(3):35–41Google Scholar
• Schrader S., Riggs W. M., Smith R. P. Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1993) 10:73–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz P.The Art of the Long View (1991) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Shenhar A. J., Dvir D. Toward a typological theory of project management. Res. Policy (1996) 25:607–632Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H.The Science of the Artificial (1969) 2nd ed.(MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K.Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Smith R. P., Eppinger S. D. A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Management Sci. (1997) 43(8):1104–1120Link, Google Scholar
• Sobek D. K., Ward A. C., Liker J. K. Toyota's principles of setbased concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40:67–83Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Lovejoy W. S., Beach D. Integrated product design for marketability and manufacturing. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:154–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stalk G., Webber A. M. Japan's dark side of time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(4):93–102Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Ross J. Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. Res. Organ. Behavior (1987) 9:39–78Google Scholar
• Steward D. The design structure matrix: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1981) EM-28(3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tatikonda M. V., Rosenthal S. R. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development execution success. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000) 47:74–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor B. W., Moore L. J. R&D project planning with Q-GERT network modeling and simulation. Management Sci. (1980) 15:44–59Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S. H. Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):743–762Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S. H., Reinertsen D. Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Management Rev. (1998) 41:8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verganti R. Planned flexibility: Linking anticipation and reaction product development projects. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16:363–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veryzer R. W. Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:304–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren D. H. Generating conditional plans and programs. Proc. AISB Summer Conf. (1976) 344–354Google Scholar
• Weiss G. Planning and learning together. Proc. Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents (2000) Barcelona, Spain:102–103Google Scholar
• Wideman R. M.Project & Program Risk Management (1992) (Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA) Google Scholar
• Williams T. M. The need for new paradigms for complex projects. Internat. J. Project Management (1999) 17(5):269–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams T. M. A classified bibliography of recent research relating to project risk management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1995) 85:18–38Crossref, Google Scholar