Managerial Insights into the Effects of Interactions on Replacing Members of a Team

References

  • Argote L., Insko A. C., Yovetich N., Romero A. A. Group learning curves: The effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1995) 25(6):512–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker D. P., Salas E., Brannick M. T., Salas E., Prince C. Principles for measuring teamwork: A summary and look toward the future. Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods and Applications (1997) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 331–355Google Scholar
  • Carley K. M. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:20–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. M. A comparison of artificial and human organizations. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1996) 31:175–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook M. The value of good employees. Personnel Selection: Adding Value Through People (1998) 3rd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M., Klempner E. Quality of group judgment. Psych. Bull. (1977) 84(1):158–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison J. R., Carrol G. R. Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 47:1–25Google Scholar
  • Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Sego D. J., Hedlund J., Major D. A., Philips J. Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in team incorporating distributed expertise. J. Appl. Psych. (1995) 80(2):292–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L., Judiesh M. K. Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75(1):28–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order (1993) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine J. M., Moreland R. L. Small groups. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) 24th ed.(McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) 415–469Google Scholar
  • McDaniel M. A., Whetzel D. L., Schmidt F. L., Maurer S. D. The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:599–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Wingert M. L. Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. Understanding Group behavior (1996) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Padgett J. F. Managing garbage can hierarchies. Admin. Sci. Quar. (1980) 25:583–604CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solow D., Burnetas A. N., Tsai M., Greenspan N. S. Understanding and attenuating the complexity catastrophe in Kauffman's NK model of genome evolution. Complexity (1999) 5(1):53–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solow D., Burnetas A. N., Tsai M., Greenspan N. S. On the expected performance of systems with complex interactions among components. Complex Systems (2000) 12(4):423–456Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tinsdale R. S., Anderson E. M. Small group research and applied social psychology: An introduction. Theory and Research on Small Groups (1998) (Plenum Press, New York) 1–8Google Scholar
  • Tziner A., Eden D. Effects of crew composition in crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 70(1):85–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1976) 41:322–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.