David vs. Goliath: An Analysis of Asymmetric Mixed-Strategy Games and Experimental Evidence

References

• Amaldoss W., Meyer R., Raju J., Rapoport A. Collaborating to compete. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(2):105–126Link, Google Scholar
• Aumann R., Katznelson Y., Radner R., Rosenthal R., Weiss B. Approximate purification of mixed strategies. Math. Oper. Res. (1983) 8(3):327–341Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton G., Zwick R. Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum games. Games and Econom. Behavior (1995) 10(1):95–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Stern S., Trajtenberg M. Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28:517–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J., Rosenthal R. Testing the minimax hypothesis: A reexamination of O′Neill's game experiment. Econometrica (1990) 58:1065–1081Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Hogarth R. Behavioral game theory. Insights in Decision Making: Theory and Applications(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 311–336Google Scholar
• Camerer C.Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interactions (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Ho T. Experience-weighted attraction learning in games. Econometrica (1999) 87(July):827–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Ho T., Chong J. Sophisticated EWA learning and strategic teaching in repeated games. J. Econom. TheoryForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Cheng L., Zhu M. Mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium based upon expected utility and quadratic utility. Games and Econom. Behavior (1995) 9:139–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M., Crawford V., Broseta B. Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica (2001) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Deneckere R., Peck J. Competition over price and service rate when demand is stochastic: A strategic analysis. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(1):148–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Coordination through committees and markets. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(2):235–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Levine D.The Theory of Learning in Games (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J. Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1985) 52:383–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Gilbert R., Stiglitz J., Tirole J. Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1983) 22(1):3–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert R., Newberry D. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72:514–526Google Scholar
• Golder P., Tellis G. Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend? J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:158–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed strategy equilibrium points. Internat. J. Game Theory (1973) 2:1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heymann P. E. The disk drive industry. (1985) (Drexel Burnham Lambert, New York) Google Scholar
• Ho T., Weigelt K. Task complexity, equilibrium selection, and learning: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1996) 42(5):659–679Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson E., Camerer C., Sen S., Rymon T. Detecting backward induction in sequential bargaining with information search. J. Econom. Theory (2001) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Lan L., Kanafani A. Economics of park-and-shop discounts: A case of bundled pricing strategy. J. Transport Econom. Policy (1993) 27:291–303Google Scholar
• Lerner J. An empirical exploration of a technology race. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(2):228–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Merges R. P. The control of technology alliances: An empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) XLV(1, 2):125–156Google Scholar
• Ochs J. Games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 10:212–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• O′Neill B. A non-metric test of the minimax theory of two-person zerosum games. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (1987) 84:2106–2109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborne M., Rubinstein A.A Course in Game Theory (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Raju J. S., Srinivasan V., Lal R. The effects of brand loyalty on competitive price promotional strategies. Management Sci. (1990) 36:276–304Link, Google Scholar
• Rao R., Arjunji R., Murthy B. Game theory and empirical generalizations concerning competitive promotions. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G89–G100Link, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A., Amaldoss W. Mixed strategies and iterative elimination of strongly dominated strategies: An experimental investigation of states of knowledge. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2000) 42:483–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A., Boebel R. B. Mixed strategies in strictly competitive games: A further test of the minimax hypothesis. Games Econom. Behavior (1992) 4:261–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A., Budescu D. V. Generation of random series by humans: A two-person zerosum game paradigm. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (1992) 121:352–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum J. Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73:741–747Google Scholar
• Reinganum J., Schmalensee R., Willig R. The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) 1(Elsevier Science, New York) 849–908Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson W., Fornell C. Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer goods industries. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(3):305–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. Sequences of games with varying opponents. Econometrica (1979) 47:1353–1366Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A. Bargaining experiments. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 253–348Google Scholar
• Roth A., Erev I. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 8:164–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith V. Markets as economizers of information: Experimental investigation of Hayek's hypothesis. Econom. Inquiry (1982) 20:165–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith V. Theory, experiment and economics. J. Econom. Perspectives (1989) 151–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl D. Boundedly rational rule learning in a guessing game. Games Econom. Behavior (1996) 12:218–254Google Scholar
• Stahl D. Sophisticated learning and learning sophistication. . Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
• Stahl D. Rule learning in symmetric normal-form games: Theory and evidence. Games Econom. Behavior (2000) 32:105–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian H. A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70:651–659Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. Models of competitive price promotions: Some empirical evidence from the coffee and saltine crackers markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4:85–107Crossref, Google Scholar