A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics

References

• Abernathy W.The Productivity Dilemma (1978) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Abernathy W., Clark K. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy (1985) 14:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afuah A. How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of a technological change? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:387–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander C. W.Notes on the Synthesis of Form (1964) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Tushman M. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(4):604–633Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Tushman M. Organizational environments and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10(3):675–711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y., Phillips L. W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:421–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. (2001) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Chesbrough H. The organizational impact of technological change: A comparative theory of national institutional factors. Indust. Corporate Change (1999) 8(3):447–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C.The Innovator's Dilemma (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.) Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Rosenbloom R. Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics and the value network. Res. Policy (1995) 24:233–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Suarez F., Utterback J. Strategies for survival in fast changing industries. Management Sci. (1999) 44(12):S207–S220Google Scholar
• Churchill G. A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res (1979) 16(1):64–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark K. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts on technological evolution. Res. Policy (1985) 14:235–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constant E. W.The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution (1980) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Cooper A., Smith C. How established firms respond to threatening technologies. Acad. Management Executive (1992) 6(2):55–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crampton S. M., Wagner III. J. A. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(1):67–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(3):555–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing contingency models. Management Sci. (1996) 42(5):693–701Link, Google Scholar
• Dess G. S., Robinson R. B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures. Strategic Management J (1984) 5:265–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewar R. D., Dutton J. E. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1422–1433Link, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy (1982) 11:147–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle P., Saunders J., Wright L. A comparative study of US and Japanese marketing strategies in British market. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1989) 5(3):171–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrnberg E. On the definition and measurement of technological discontinuities. Technovation (1995) 15:437–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettlie J., Bridges W., O'Keefe R. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Sci. (1984) 30:682–695Link, Google Scholar
• Flemming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci (2001) 47(1):117–132Link, Google Scholar
• Foster R.Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage (1986) (Summit Books, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glassmeier A. Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Res. Policy (1991) 20:469–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S., Gavin M., Smith L. Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical innovation. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1995) 42(3):203–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(2):248–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. Of life cycles real and imaginary: The unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography. Res. Policy (1995) 24(4):631–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of existing firms. Admin. Sci. Quart (1990) 35:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollander S.Sources of Efficiency (1965) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Hughes T.Networks of Power (1983) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Khanna T. Technological evolution, system architecture and the obsolescence of firm capabilities. Indust. Soc. Change (1995) 4(2):333–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landes D.Revolution in Time (1983) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Langlois R., Robertson T. Networks and innovation in a modular system. Res. Policy (1992) 21:297–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKendrick D., Doner R., Haggard S.From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry (2000) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart (1989) 34:208–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers S., Marquis D.Successful Industrial Innovation (1969) (NSF, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econom. Literature (1995) 33:48–90Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.) Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I.H.Psychometric Theory (1994) 3rd Ed.(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Pinch T., Bijker W., Bijker W., Hughes T., Pinch T. The social construction of facts and artifacts. The Social Construction of Technological Systems (1987) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Podolny J., Stuart T. A role based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociology (1995) 100:1224–1260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A., Baum J., McKelvey W. On the complexity of technological evolution: Exploring coevolution within and across hierarchical levels in optical disc technology. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of D.T. Campbell (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. The coevolution of community networks and technology: Lessons from the flight simulator industry. Indust. Corporate Change (1998) 7:311–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermal F. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:687–699Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanderson S., Uzumeri M. Product platforms and dominant designs: The case of Sony's Walkman. Res. Policy (1995) 24:583–607Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z., Veiga J. F. A primer on internet organizational surveys. Organ. Res. Methods (2001) 4(3):218–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanton J. M. An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Personnel Psych (1998) 51:709–725Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull D. The dynamics of standing still: Firestone tire and rubber and the radial revolution. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1999) 73(3):430–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D., Pisano G. Dynamic capabilities of firms. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3:537–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer):119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging. Strategic Management J (2000) 21(10/11):1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Murmann J. P. Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes. Res. Organ. behavior (1998) 20:231–266Google Scholar
• Ulrich K., Eppinger S.Product Design and Development (1995) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A., Garud R., Baum J., Singh J. The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V. Measurement of business performance in strategic research: A comparison of approaches. Acad. Management Rev (1986) 11(4):801–814Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vincenti W. The retractable landing gear and the Northrup anomaly. Tech. Culture (1994) 35(1):1–33Crossref, Google Scholar