Contracts in Offshore Software Development: An Empirical Analysis

References

  • Bajari P., Tadelis S. Incentives vs. transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(3):387–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee A. V., Duflo E. Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the Indian software industry. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):989–1017CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barki H., Rivard S., Talbot J. Toward an assessment of software development risk. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2):203–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnow B. S., Cain G. S., Goldberger A. S. Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias. Eval. Stud. Rev. Annual (1981) 5:43–59Google Scholar
  • Belsley D. A., Kuh E., Welsch R. E.Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (1980) (Wiley and Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binstock A. Outside development partners. InformationWeek (1999) 133–140(Oct 18)Google Scholar
  • Crocker K. J., Reynolds K. J. The efficiency of incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of Air Force engine procurement. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(2):126–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fitzgerald G., Willcocks L. Contracts and partnerships in the outsourcing of IT. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1994) 91–98Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
  • Gopal A., Mukhopadhyay T., Krishnan M. S. The role of software processes and communication in offshore software development. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(4ve):193–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guinan P. J., Cooprider J. G., Faraj S. Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):101–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hart O., Moore J. Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica (1988) 56(4):755–785CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harter D. E., Krishnan M. S., Slaughter S. A. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):451–467LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Social Measurement (1976) 5:475–492Google Scholar
  • Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C.Assessment and Control of Software Risks (1994) (Yourdon Press, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Keane M. P., Runkle D. E. Testing the rationality of price forecasts: New evidence from panel data. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(4):714–735Google Scholar
  • King J., Hoffman T. Outsourcing gotchas. Computerworld (1998) 32(26Google Scholar
  • Krishnan M. S., Kriebel C. H., Kekre S., Mukhopadhyay T. An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):745–759LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lacity M. C., Hirschheim R. A.Information Systems Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors and Realities (1993) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lacity M. C., Willcocks L. P. An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience. MIS Quart. (1998) 22:363–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacity M. C., Willcocks L. P., Feeny D. F. IT outsourcing: Maximize flexibility and control. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73:84–93Google Scholar
  • Lafontaine F., Slade M. E., Chatterjee K., Samuelson W. Incentive contracting and the franchise decision. Adv. Bus. Appl. Game Theory (2001) (Kluwer Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Lovell M. C. Tests of the rational expectations hypothesis. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(1):110–124Google Scholar
  • Maddala G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandell J. Retaining IT talent. Software Magazine (1998) 18(13):20Google Scholar
  • McGee M. K. Boot camp for CIOs. Informationweek (1998) Sept. 28):46Google Scholar
  • Mjoen H., Tallman S. Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):257–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller M., Kaye L. Climbing the value ladder. Inst. Investor (1999) 33(9):130–137Google Scholar
  • Nidomolu S. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(3):191–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nidomolu S. R., Goodman S. E. Computing in India: An Asian elephant learning to dance. Comm. ACM (1993) 36(4):15–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richmond W. B., Seidmann A., Whinston A. B. Incomplete contracting issues in information systems development outsourcing. Decision Support Systems (1992) 8(5):459–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro S., Wilk M. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika (1965) 52:591–612CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shehata M. Self-selection bias and the economic consequences of accounting regulation: An application of two-stage switching regression to SFAS, No. 2. Accounting Rev. (1991) 66(4):768–787Google Scholar
  • Whang S. Contracting for software development. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):307–325LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whang S. Market provision of custom software: Learning effects and low balling. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1343–1357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Transaction-cost Economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. (1979) 22(2):233–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.