Computing Power Indices for Large Voting Games

References

  • Banzhaf J. F. Weighted voting doesn't work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev. (1965) 19(2):317–343Google Scholar
  • Bilbao J. M., Fernandez J. R., Jimenez A., Lopez J. J. Generating functions for computing power indices efficiently. Top (2000) 8(2):191–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brams S., Affuso P. J. Power and size: A new paradox. Theory Decision (1976) 7:29–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felsenthal D. S., Machover M.The Measurement of Voting Power (1998) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, U. K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felsenthal D. S., Machover M. The treaty of nice and qualified majority voting. Soc. Choice Welfare (2001) 19:465–483Google Scholar
  • Lambert J. P. Voting games, power indices and presidential elections. UMAP J. (1988) 9:216–277Google Scholar
  • Leech D. The relationship between shareholding concentration and shareholder voting power in british companies: A study of the application of power indices for simple games. Management Sci. (1988) 34:509–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leech D. Shareholder voting power and corporate governance: A study of large British companies. Nordic J. Political Econom. (2001) 27(1):33–54Google Scholar
  • Leech D. An empirical comparison of the performance of classical power indices. Political Stud. (2002a) 50(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leech D. Voting power in the governance of the international monetary fund. Ann. Oper. Res. (2002b) 109:375–397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leech D. Designing the voting system for the council of the European union. Public Choice (2002c) 113(3–4):437–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leech D. Computation of power indices Economic research papers, Number 644. (2002d) (Warwick University, Warwick, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Lucas W. F., Brams S., Lucas W., Straffin P. Measuring power in weighted voting systems. Political and Related Models (1983) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mann I., Shapley L. S.Values of Large Games IV: Evaluating the Electoral College by Montecarlo Techniques (1960) (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) . Rand Corporation memo RM-2651Google Scholar
  • Mann I., Shapley L. S.Values of Large Games VI: Evaluating the Electoral College Exactly (1962) (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) . Rand Corporation memo RM-2651Google Scholar
  • Nijenhuis A., Wilf H. S.Combinatorial Algorithms (1983) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Owen G. Multilinear extensions of games. Management Sci. (1972) 18:P-64–P-79(5, Part 2)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Owen G. Multilinear extensions and the Banzhaf value. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1975) 22:741–750CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patterson T. N. cL. The optimum addition of points to quadrature formulae. Math. Comput. (1968) 22:847–856CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapley L. S., Shubik M. A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1954) 48:787–792CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straffin P. D., Aumann R. J., Hart S. Power and stability in politics. Handbook of Game Theory (1994) 2(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Chapter 32Google Scholar
  • Widgren M. A note on Matthias Sutter. J. Theoret. Politics (2000) 12(4):451–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.