A Generalization of Pratt-Arrow Measure to Nonexpected-Utility Preferences and Inseparable Probability and Utility

References

  • Arrow K. J. The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing. Quart. J. Econom. (1964) 31:91–96Google Scholar
  • Arrow K. J. The theory of risk aversion. Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing (1965) . Lecture 2 inGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann R.Essays on Economic Decision under Uncertainty (1971) (Cambridge University Press, London, U.K) . Letter to L. J. Savage. Reprinted in J. Drèze. 1987Google Scholar
  • Chew S. H. A Schur-concave characterization of risk aversion for non-expected utility preferences. J. Econom. Theory (1995) 67:402–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chew S. H., Karni E., Safra Z. Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 42:370–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. Risk aversion concepts in expected and non-expected utility theory. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory (1995) 20(1):73–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Courtault J.-M., Gayant J.-P. Local risk aversion in the rank dependent expected utility model: First order versus second order effects. Econom. Lett. (1998) 59:207–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Finetti B. Sulla preferibilitá. Giornale Econom. Ann. Econom. (1952) 11:685–709Google Scholar
  • Debreu G.Theory of Value (1959) (Cowles Foundation, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Debreu G., Arrow K. J., Karlin S., Suppes P. Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences (1960) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 16–26Google Scholar
  • Drèze J. Market allocation under uncertainty. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1970) 2:133–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eeckhoudt L., Gollier C., Schlesinger H. Changes in background risk and risk taking behavior. Econometrica (1996) 64:683–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein L. A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66:579–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein L., Zhang J. Subjective probabilities on subjectively unambiguous events. Econometrica (2001) 69:265–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn P., Wakker P. The invention of the independence condition for preferences. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1130–1144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gollier C., Pratt J. W. Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica (1996) 64:1109–1123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirshleifer J. Investment decision under uncertainty: Choice-theoretic approaches. Quart. J. Econom. (1965) 74:509–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karni E. Risk aversion for state-dependent utility functions: Measurement and applications. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1983) 24:637–647CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karni E.Decision Making under Uncertainty: The Case of State-Dependent Preferences (1985) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Karni E. Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm: Discussion. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory (1995) 20:51–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karni E., Mongin P. On the determination of subjective probability by choices. Management Sci. (2000) 46:233–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karni E., Schmeidler D., Vind K. On state dependent preferences and subjective probabilities. Econometrica (1983) 51:1021–1031CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelsey D., Nordquist G. A more general measure of risk aversion when utility is state-dependent. Oxford Econom. Papers (1991) 43:59–74Google Scholar
  • Kihlstrom R., Romer D., Williams S. Risk aversion with random initial wealth. Econometrica (1981) 49:911–920CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball M. Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1990) 58:53–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klibanoff P., Marinacci M., Mukerji S. A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. (2002) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Machina M. Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory (1995) 20:9–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machina M., Schmeidler D. A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica (1992) 60:745–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M., Green J.Microeconomic Theory (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nau R. F. Coherent decision analysis with inseparable probabilities and utilities. J. Risk Uncertainty (1995) 10:71–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nau R. F. De Finetti was right: Probability does not exist. Theory Decision (2001) 59:89–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nau R. F. Uncertainty aversion with second-order utilities and probabilities. (2002) . Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Nau R. F., McCardle K. F. Arbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium. Theory Decision (1991) 31:199–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt J. W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1964) 32:122–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt J. W. Aversion to one risk in the presence of others. J. Risk Uncertainty (1988) 1:395–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross S., Friend I., Bicksler J. Risk, return, and arbitrage. Risk and Return in Finance (1976) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ross S. A simple approach to the valuation of risky streams. J. Bus. (1978) 51(3):453–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross S. Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and the large with applications. Econometrica (1981) 49:621–638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. E. Increasing risk I: A definition. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2:225–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein M. The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. (1976) 7:407–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savage L.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schervish M. J., Seidenfeld T., Kadane J. B. State-dependent utilities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85:840–847CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlee E., Schlesinger H. The valuation of contingent claim markets. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 6:19–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal U., Spivak A. First order versus second order risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory (1990) 51:111–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shafer G. Savage revisited. Statist. Sci. (1986) 1:463–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J. E., Nau R. F. Valuing risky projects: Option pricing theory and decision analysis. Management Sci. (1995) 41:795–816LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trigeorgis L., Mason S. P. Valuing managerial flexibility. Midland Corporate Finance J. (1987) 5:14–21Google Scholar
  • Yaari M. Some remarks on measures of risk aversion and their uses. J. Econom. Theory (1969) 1:315–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.