Almost Every Convex or Quadratic Programming Problem Is Well Posed

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1030.0080

References

  • Čoban M. M., Revalski P. S., Kenderov J. P. Densely defined selections of multivalued mappings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (1994) 344:533–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Čoban M. M., Kenderov P. S., Revalski J. P. Topological spaces related to the Banach-Mazur game and generic properties of optimization problems. Set-Valued Anal. (1995) 3:263–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Blasi F. S., Myjak J., Papini P. L. Porous sets in best approximation theory. J. London Math. Soc. (1991) 44:135–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deville R., Revalski J. P. Porosity of ill-posed problems. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (2000) 128:1117–1124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deville R., Godefroy G., Zizler V. Smoothness and renormings in Banach spaces. Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Appl. Math. (1991) (Longman Group UK Limited, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Dontchev A. L., Zolezzi T. Well-posed optimization problems. Lectures Notes in Mathematics, No. 1543 (1993) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ioffe A. D., Lucchetti R., Di Pillo G., Giannessi F. Generic existence, uniqueness and stability in optimization. Nonlinear Optimization and Related Topics (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 169–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ioffe A. D., Zaslavski A. J. Variational principles and well-posedness in optimization and calculus of variations. SIAM J. Control Optim. (2000) 38:566–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ioffe A. D., Lucchetti R., Revalski J. P. A variational principle for problems with functional constraints. SIAM J. Optim. (2001) 12:461–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenderov P. S., Revalski J. P., Lucchetti R., Revalski J. P. Generic well-posedness of optimization problems and the Banach-Mazur game. Recent Developments in Well-Posed Variational Problems. Mathematics and Its Applications (1995) 331(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 117–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucchetti R., Zolezzi T., Fiacco A. V. On well-posedness and stability analysis in optimization. Mathematical Programming with Data Perturbations (1997) (M. Dekker, New York) 223–252Google Scholar
  • Marchini E. Porosity and variational principles. Serdica Math. J. (2002) 28:37–46Google Scholar
  • Revalski J. P. Generic properties in some classes of optimization problems. Acta. Univ. Carolinae Math. Phys. (1987) 28:117–125Google Scholar
  • Spingarn J. E., Rockafellar R. T. The generic nature of optimality conditions in nonlinear programming. Math. Oper. Res. (1979) 4:425–430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stoyanov T. S. A measure on the space of compact subsets in Rn and its application to some classes of optimization problems. C. R. Acad. Bulgarian Sci. (1989) 42:29–31Google Scholar
  • Zajíček L. Porosity and σ-porosity. Real Anal. Exchange (1987–88) 13:314–350Google Scholar
  • Zolezzi T. Wellposedness criteria in optimization with application to the calculus of variations. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. (1995) 25:437–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zolezzi T. Extended well-posedness of optimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1996) 91:257–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.