Efficiency Loss in a Network Resource Allocation Game

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1040.0091

References

  • Anshelevich E., Dasgupta A., Tardos E., Wexler T. Near-optimal network design with selfish agents. Proc. 35th Ann. ACM Symposium on the Theory of Comput. (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 511–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P.Nonlinear Programming (1999) 2nd ed.(Athena Scientific, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Tsitsiklis J. N.Introduction to Linear Optimization (1997) (Athena Scientific, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Briscoe B., Darlagiannis V., Heckman O., Oliver H., Siris V., Songhurst D., Stiller B. A market managed multiservice Internet (M3I). Comput. Comm. (2003) 26(4):404–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubey P. Inefficiency of Nash equilibria. Math. Oper. Res. (1986) 11:1–8LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan B. Pumpkin pies and public goods: The raffle fundraising strategy. Public Choice (2002) 111(1–2):49–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fabrikant A., Luthra A., Maneva E., Papadimitriou C., Shenker S. On a network creation game. Proc. 22nd Ann. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 347–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falkner M., Devetsikiotis M., Lambadaris I. An overview of pricing concepts for broadband IP networks. IEEE Comm. Surveys (2000) 3(2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbens R. J., Kelly F. P. Resource pricing and the evolution of congestion control. Automatica (1999) 35:1969–1985CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hajek B., Gopalakrishnan G. Do greedy autonomous systems make for a sensible Internet? (2002) Presented at the Conference on Stochastic NetworksStanford University, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson M. O., Swinkels J. M. Existence of equilibrium in auctions and discontinuous Bayesian games: Endogenous and incentive compatibility sharing rules. (1999) . Social Science Working Paper 1075, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly F. P. Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. Eur. Trans. Telecomm. (1997) 8:33–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly F. P., Maulloo A. K., Tan D. K. Rate control for communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness, and stability. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998) 49:237–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koutsoupias E., Papadimitriou C. Worst-case equilibria. Proc. 16th Annual Sympos. on Theoret. Aspects of Comput. Sci. (1999) (Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) 404–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKie-Mason J. K., Varian H. R., Kahin B., Keller J. Pricing the internet. Public Access to the Internet (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 269–314Google Scholar
  • Maheswaran R. T., Basar T. Nash equilibrium and decentralized negotiation in auctioning divisible resources. Group Decision Negotiation (2003) 12(5):361–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. R.Microeconomic Theory (1995) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Monderer D., Shapley L. S. Potential games. Games Econom. Behavior (1996) 14(1):124–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odlyzko A. M. Paris metro pricing for the Internet. Proc. ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (EC '99) (1999) (ACM Press, New York) 140–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papadimitriou C. Algorithms, games, and the Internet. Proc. 33rd Ann. ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2001) (ACM Press, New York) 749–753CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1997) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics and Physics SeriesReprinted from Rockafellar, R. T. Convex Analysis. 1970. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen J. Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person games. Econometrica (1965) 33(3):520–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology. Proc. 34th Annual ACM Sympos. on the Theory of Comput. (2002) (ACM Press, New York) 428–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T., Tardos E. How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM (2002) 49(2):236–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz A. S., Stier Moses N. On the performance of user equilibria in traffic networks. Proc. 14th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. on Discrete Algorithms (2003) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA) 86–87Google Scholar
  • Shenker S. Fundamental design issues for the future Internet. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm. (1995) 13:1176–1188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shenker S., Clark D., Estrin D., Herzog S. Pricing in computer networks: Reshaping the research agenda. Telecomm. Policy (1996) 20(3):183–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stoica I., Abdel-Wahab H., Jeffay K., Baruah S., Gehrke J., Plaxton C. A proportional share resource allocation algorithm for real-time time-shared systems. Proc. 17th IEEE Real-Time Systems Sympos. (1996) 288–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vetta A. Nash equilibrium in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing, and auctions. Proc. 43rd Ann. IEEE Sympos. on the Foundations of Comput. Sci. (2002) (ACM Press, New York) 416–425Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.