The Strong Second-Order Sufficient Condition and Constraint Nondegeneracy in Nonlinear Semidefinite Programming and Their Implications

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1060.0195

References

  • Bonnans J. F., Ramírez C H. Perturbation analysis of second order cone programming problems. Math. Programming, Ser. B (2005a) 104:205–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonnans J. F., Ramírez C H. Strong regularity of semidefinite programming problems. (2005b) . Techincal Report CMM-DIM B-05/06-137, Department of Mathematical Engineering, Universida de ChileGoogle Scholar
  • Bonnans J. F., Shapiro A. Optimization problems with perturbations: A guided tour. SIAM Rev. (1998) 40:202–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonnans J. F., Shapiro A.Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems (2000) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonnans J. F., Sulem A. Pseudopower expansion of solutions of generalized equations and constrained optimization problems. Math. Programming (1995) 70:123–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonnans J. F., Cominetti R., Shapiro A. Sensitivity analysis of optimization problems under second order regularity constraints. Math. Oper. Res. (1998) 23:803–832LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bonnans J. F., Cominetti R., Shapiro A. Second order optimality conditions based on parabolic second order tangent sets. SIAM J. Optim. (1999) 9:466–493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke F. H. On the inverse function theorem. Pacific J. Math. (1976) 64:97–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke F. H.Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis (1983) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dontchev A. L., Rockafellar R. T. Characterizations of strong regularity for variational inequalities over polyhedral convex sets. SIAM J. Optim. (1996) 6:1087–1105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eaves B. C. On the basic theorem of complementarity. Math. Programming (1971) 1:68–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Facchinei F., Pang J. S.Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems (2003) I(Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gauvin J. A necessary and sufficient regularity condition to have bounded multipliers in nonconvex programming. Math. Programming (1977) 12:136–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gowda M. S. Inverse and implicit function theorems for H-differentiable and semismooth functions. Optim. Methods Software (2004) 19:443–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higham N. J. Computing a nearest symmetric positive semidefinite matrix. Linear Algebra Its Appl. (1988) 103:103–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jongen H. Th., Rückmann J., Tammer K. Implicit functions and sensitivity of stationary points. Math. Programming (1990) 49:123–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jongen H. Th., Mobert T., Rückmann J., Tammer K. On inertia and Schur complement in optimization. Linear Algebra Its Appl. (1987) 95:97–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klatte D., Kummer B.Nonsmooth Equations in Optimization: Regularity, Calculus, Methods and Applications (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kojima M., Robinson S. M. Strongly stable stationary solutions in nonlinear programs. Analysis and Computation of Fixed Points (1980) (Academic Press, New York) 93–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kummer B. Lipschitzian inverse functions, directional derivatives, and applications in C1, 1-optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1991) 70:559–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lloyd N. G.Degree Theory (1978) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Mangasarian O. L., Fromovitz S. The Fritz-John necessary optimality conditions in the presence of equality and inequality constraints. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1967) 7:37–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meng F., Sun D., Zhao G. Semismoothness of solutions to generalized equations and the Moreau-Yosida regularization. Math. Programming, Ser. B (2005) 104:561–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mifflin R. Semismooth and semiconvex functions in constrained optimization. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1977) 15:957–972CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ortega J. M., Rheinboldt W. C.Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables (1970) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pang J. S., Sun D., Sun J. Semismooth homeomorphisms and strong stability of semidefinite and Lorentz complementarity problems. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28:39–63LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Qi L., Sun J. A nonsmooth version of Newton’s method. Math. Programming (1993) 58:353–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. Stability theory for systems of inequalities, Part I: Linear systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. (1975) 12:754–769CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. First order conditions for general nonlinear optimization. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1976) 30:597–607CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. Strongly regular generalized equations. Math. Oper. Res. (1980) 5:43–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. Local structure of feasible sets in nonlinear programming, Part II: Nondegeneracy. Math. Programming Stud. (1984) 22:217–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. Local structure of feasible sets in nonlinear programming, Part III: Stability and sensitivity. Math. Programming Stud. (1987) 30:45–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. An implicit-function theorem for a class of nonsmooth functions. Math. Oper. Res. (1991) 16:292–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. Constraint nondegeneracy in variational analysis. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28:201–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T., Wets R. J-B.Variational Analysis (1998) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A. Rank-reducibility of a symmetric matrix and sampling theory of minimum trace factor analysis. Psychometrika (1982) 47:187–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A. First and second order analysis of nonlinear semidefinite programs. Math. Programming, Ser. B (1997) 77:301–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A. Sensitivity analysis of generalized equations. J. Math. Sci. (2003) 115:2554–2565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun D., Sun J. Semismooth matrix valued functions. Math. Oper. Res. (2002) 27:150–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tseng P. Merit functions for semi-definite complementarity problems. Math. Programming (1998) 83:159–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zarantonello E. H., Zarantonello E. H. Projections on convex sets in Hilbert space and spectral theory I and II. Contributions to Nonlinear Functional Analysis (1971) (Academic Press, New York) 237–424CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.