An Efficient Interior-Point Method for Convex Multicriteria Optimization Problems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1060.0221

References

  • Benson Harold P., Sayın Serpil. Towards finding global representations of the efficient set in multiple objective mathematical programming. Naval Res. Logist. (1997) 44:47–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berkelaar A. B. Complementarity and interior point methodology. (1995) . Master’s thesis, Department of Statistics, Probability and Operations Research, Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Berkelaar Arjan B., Jansen Benjamin, Roos Kees, Terlaky Tamás. An interior-point approach to parametric convex quadratic programming. (1996) . Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. (February 29). Revised December 23, 1997Google Scholar
  • Carrizosa Emilio, Fliege Jörg. Generalized goal programming: Polynomial methods and applications. Math. Programming (2002) 93:281–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das Indraneel, Dennis J. E. Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating Pareto optimal points in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) 8(3):631–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das Indraneel, Dennis John. A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems. Structural Optim. (1997) 14(1):63–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fliege Jörg. Approximation techniques for the set of efficient points. (2001) . Professorial dissertation, Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany. (January 31)Google Scholar
  • Fliege Jörg. Gap-free computation of Pareto-points by quadratic scalarizations. Math. Methods Oper. Res. (2004) 59:69–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fliege Jörg, Heseler Andree. Constructing approximations to the efficient set of convex quadratic multiobjective problems. (2002) . Ergebnisberichte Angewandte Mathematik 211, Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Dortmund, 44221 Dortmund, Germany. (January). ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion Arthur M. Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1968) 22:618–630Google Scholar
  • Gondzio Jacek. Warm start of the primal-dual method applied in the cutting plane scheme. Math. Programming (1998) 83(1):125–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gondzio Jacek, Grothey Andreas. Reoptimization with the primal-dual interior point method. SIAM J. Optim. (2003) 13:561–584Google Scholar
  • Gondzio Jacek, Vial Jean-Pierre. Warm start and ϵ-subgradients in a cutting plane scheme for block-angular linear programs. Comput. Optim. Appl. (1999) 14(1):17–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Göpfert Alfred, Nehse Reinhard. Vektoroptimierung—Theorie, Verfahren und Anwendungen. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Bibliothek (1990) 74(B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Hadigheh Alireza Ghaffari, Romanko Oleksandr, Terlaky Tamás. Sensitivity analyis in convex quadratic optimization: Simultaneous perturbation of the objective and right-hand-side vectors. (2003) . AdvOl-report 2003/6, Advanced Optimization Laboratory, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. (December)Google Scholar
  • Haimes Y. Y., Steuer Ralph E. Research and practice in multiple criteria decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (2000) 487(Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Heermann Christoph, Fliege Jörg, Weyers Bernd, Branke Jürgen, Deb Kalyanmoy, Miettinen Kaisa, Steuer Ralph E. A new adaptive algorithm for convex quadratic multicriteria optimization. Practical Approaches to Multi-Objective Optimization. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (2004) (Schloß Dagstuhl, Germany)Google Scholar
  • Heseler Andree. Bestimmung effizienter Portefeuilles durch Warmstart-Innere-Punkt-Methoden. (2000) . Diplomarbeit, Lehrstuhl für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Heseler Andree. Warmstart-Strategien in der parametrisierten Optimierung mit Anwendung in der multikriteriellen Optimierung. (2005) . Ph.D. thesis, Lehrstuhl für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Hillermeier Claus. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization: A generalized homotopy approach. International Series of Numerical Mathematics (2001) 25(Birkhäuser Verlag, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Horst R., Pardalos P.Handbook of Global Optimization (1995) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horst R., Tuy H.Global Optimization: Deterministic Approaches (1993) 2nd ed.(Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jahn Johannes. Mathematical Vector Optimization in Partially Ordered Linear Spaces (1986) (Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Jahn Johannes. Vector Optimization: Theory, Applications and Methods (2004) (Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jüschke A., Jahn J., Kirsch A. A bicriterial optimization problem of antenna design. Comput. Optim. Appl. (1997) 7:261–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Köksalan M., Zionts S. Multiple criteria decision making in the new millennium. Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) (2001) Ankara, Turkey, 2000(Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz Harry M.Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets (1987) (Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Markowitz Harry M.Portfolio Selection, Efficient Diversification of Investments (1991) 2nd ed.(Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Mitchell John E. Cutting plane methods for conic programs. SIAM Conf. Optim. (2005) . (May)Google Scholar
  • Nesterov Yurii, Nemirovskii Arkadii. Interior-point polynomial algorithms in convex programming. SIAM Stud. Appl. Math. (1994) 13(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oskoorouchi Mohammad E., Mitchell John E. A second-order cone cutting surface method: Complexity and application. (2005) . Available at http://www.optimization-online.org (May 11)Google Scholar
  • Renegar James. Linear Programming, Complexity Theory and Elementary Functional Analysis (1994) . Published as [32], (June)Google Scholar
  • Renegar James. Linear programming, complexity theory and elementary functional analysis. Math. Programming (1995) 70A:279–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar James. A mathematical view of interior-point methods for convex optimizations. MPS-SIAM Ser. Optim. (2001) . Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Rudolf Markus. Algorithms for Portfolio Optimization and Portfolio Insurance (1994) (Paul Haupt, Bern, Switzerland) Google Scholar
  • Sawaragi Yoshikazu, Nakayama Hirotaka, Tanino Tetsuzo. Theory of multiobjective optimization. Mathematics in Science and Engineering (1985) 176(Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Steinbach Mark C. Markowitz revisited: Mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis. SIAM Rev. (2001) 43(1):31–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wohlmuth Barbara I., Hoppe Ronald H. W. A comparison of a posteriori error estimators for mixed finite element discretizations by Raviart-Thomas elements. Math. Comput. (1999) 68:1347–1378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yıldırım E. Alper, Todd Michael J. Sensitivity analysis in linear programming and semidefinite programming using interior-point method. Math. Programming (2001) 90:229–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yıldırım E. Alper, Wright S. J. Warm-start strategies in interior-point methods for linear programming. SIAM J. Optim. (2002) 12:782–810CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.