The “Price of Anarchy” Under Nonlinear and Asymmetric Costs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1070.0258

References

  • Basu S., Pollack R., Roy M.-F.Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry (2006) 102nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics SeriesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckmann M., McGuire C. B., Winsten C. B.Studies in the Economics of Transportation (1956) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Braess D. Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmenforschung (1968) 12:258–268Google Scholar
  • Chau C. K., Sim K. M. The price of anarchy for non-atomic congestion games with symmetric cost maps and elastic demands. Oper. Res. Lett. (2003) 31:327–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole R., Dodis Y., Roughgarden T. Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users. Conference version appeared in STOC (2003) 521–530 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/780542.780618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correa J., Schulz A., Stier Moses N. Computational complexity, fairness, and the price of anarchy of the maximum latency problem. Proc. 10th Integer Programming Combinat. Optim. Conf. (IPCO’04), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2004) 3064Berlin, Germany:59–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correa J., Schulz A., Stier Moses N. Selfish routing in capacitated networks. Math. Oper. Res. (2004) 29(4):961–976LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos S. Traffic equilibria and variational inequalities. Transportation Sci. (1980) 14:42–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos S. Toll patterns for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transportation Sci. (1973) 7:211–223LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos S., Nagurney A. A network formulation of market equilibrium problems, and variational inequlities. Oper. Res. Lett. (1984) 3:274–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos S., Sparrow F. T. The traffic assignment problem for a general network. J. Res. National Bureau Standards B (1969) 73B:91–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubey P. Inefficiency of Nash equilibria. Math. Oper. Res. (1986) 11:1–8LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Florian M., Hearn D., Ball M., Magnanti T., Monma C., Nemhauser G. Network equilibrium models and algorithms. Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science (1995) 8(Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Florian M., Los M. A new look at static spatial price equilibrium problems. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. (1982) 12:579–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabay D., Moulin H., Bensoussan A., Kleindorfer P., Tapiero C. S. On the uniqueness and stability of Nash-equilibria in non-cooperative games. Applied Stochastic Control in Econometrics and Management Science (1980) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Hammond J. H. Solving asymmetric variational inequalities and systems of equations with generalized nonlinear programming algorithms. (1984) . Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Hearn D., Ramana M., Marcotte P., Nguyen S. Solving congestion toll pricing models. Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modeling(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 109–124Google Scholar
  • Hearn D., Yildirim M., Marcotte P., Gendreau M. A toll pricing framework for traffic assignment problems with elastic demand. Transportation and Network Analysis—Current Trends (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 135–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johari R., Tsitsiklis J. N. Network resource allocation and a congestion game. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 29(3):407–435LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koutsoupias E., Papadimitriou C. H., Meinel G., Tison S. Worst-case equilibria. Proc. 16th Annual Sympos. on Theoretical Aspects of Comput. Sci., Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1999) 1563(Springer-Verlag, Trier, Germany) 387–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcotte P. Network design problem with congestion effects: A case of bilevel programming. Math. Programming (1986) 34:142–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagurney A.Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach (1993) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagurney A., Dong J., Zhang D. A supply chain network equilibrium model. Transportation Res. E (2002) 38:281–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y., Nemirovskii A.Interior Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming. SIAM Stud. Appl. Math. (1994) 13(SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pan V. Y. Solving a polynomial equation: Some history and recent progress. SIAM Rev. (1997) 39:187–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pang J-S., Facchinei F.Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems (2003) I and II(Springer Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Patriksson M. The traffic assignment problem: Models and methods. Monograph (1994) . http://www.math.chalmers.se/∼mipat/LATEX/book_pub.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Perakis G. The price of anarchy under nonlinear and asymmetric costs. (2003) . Working paper, ORC, MIT, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Perakis G., Sood A. Competitive multi-period pricing for perishable products: A robust optimization approach. Math. Programming (2006) 107(1–2):295–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology. Proc. 34th ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2002) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 428–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. Selfish routing. (2002) . Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T., Tardos E. How bad is selfish routing. Proc. 41st IEEE Sympos. Foundations of Comput. Sci. (2000) 93–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T., Tardos E. Bounding the inefficiency of equilibria in nonatomic congestion games. J. ACM (2002) 49(2):236–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. J. The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transportation Res. (1979) 13B:295–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun J. A convergence analysis for a convex version of Dikin’s algorithm. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 62:357–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wardrop J. G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Inst. Civil Engineers, Part II (1952) 325–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.