Lagrangian Relaxation via Ballstep Subgradient Methods

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1070.0261

References

  • Anstreicher K. M., Wolsey L. On dual solutions in subgradient optimization. (1993) . Technical report, Department of Management Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IAGoogle Scholar
  • Bahiense L., Maculan N., Sagastizábal C. A. The volume algorithm revisited: Relation with bundle methods. Math. Programming (2002) 94:41–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E., Carrera M. C. A dynamic subgradient-based branch-and-bound procedure for set covering. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(6):875–890LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barahona F., Anbil R. The volume algorithm: Producing primal solutions with a subgradient method. Math. Programming (2000) 87(3):385–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barahona F., Anbil R. On some difficult linear programs coming from set partitioning. Discrete Appl. Math. (2002) 118(1-2):3–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barahona F., Chudak D., Pardalos P. M. Solving large scale uncapacitated facility location problems. Approximation and Complexity in Numerical Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Problems (2000) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 48–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Margalit T., Nemirovski A. The ordered subsets mirror descent optimization method with applications to tomography. SIAM J. Optim. (2001) 12(1):79–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P.Network Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Models (1998) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P.Nonlinear Programming (1999) 2nd ed.(Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Burke J. V., Ferris M. C. Characterization of solutions sets of convex programs. Oper. Res. Lett. (1991) 10:57–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ceria S., Nobili P., Sassano A. A Lagrangian-based heuristic for large-scale set covering problems. Math. Programming (1998) 81(2):215–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feltenmark S., Kiwiel K. C. Dual applications of proximal bundle methods, including Lagrangian relaxation of nonconvex problems. SIAM J. Optim. (2000) 10(3):697–721CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fukushima M. A nonsmooth optimization approach to nonlinear multicommodity network flow problems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan (1984) 27(2):151–176Google Scholar
  • Fukushima M. On a dual approach to the traffic assignment problem. Transportation Res. (1984) 18:235–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallo G., Pallotino S. Shortest path algorithms. Ann. Oper. Res. (1988) 13:3–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffin J.-L., Contesse L., Correa R., Weintraub A. The ellipsoid method and its predecessors. Recent Advances in System Modelling and Optimization. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences (1987) 87(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 127–141Google Scholar
  • Goffin J.-L., Gondzio J., Sarkissian R., Vial J.-Ph. Solving nonlinear multicommodity flow problems by the analytic center cutting plane method. Math. Programming (1996) 76(1):131–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gondzio J., Sarkissian R., Vial J.-Ph. Using an interior point method for the master problem in a decomposition approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 101:577–587CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiriart-Urruty J.-B., Lemaréchal C.Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms (1993) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C. Proximity control in bundle methods for convex nondifferentiable minimization. Math. Programming (1990) 46:105–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C. Proximal level bundle methods for convex nondifferentiable optimization, saddle-point problems and variational inequalities. Math. Programming (1995) 69:89–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C. The efficiency of subgradient projection methods for convex optimization. Part II: Implementations and extensions. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1996) 34(2):677–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C. Efficiency of proximal bundle methods. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (2000) 104(3):589–603CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C. Convergence of approximate and incremental subgradient methods for convex optimization. SIAM J. Optim. (2004) 14(3):807–840CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C., Lindberg P. O., Butnariu D., Censor Y., Reich S. Parallel subgradient methods for convex optimization. Inherently Parallel Algorithms in Feasibility and Optimization and Their Applications. Studies in Computational Mathematics (2001) 8(Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 335–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C., Larsson T., Lindberg P. O. Dual properties of ballstep subgradient methods, with applications to Lagrangian relaxation. (1999) . Technical Report LiTH-MAT-R-1999-24, Department of Mathematics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Revised October 2002, and December 2005Google Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C., Larsson T., Lindberg P. O. The efficiency of ballstep subgradient level methods for convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. (1999) 24(1):237–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T., Liu Z. A Lagrangean relaxation scheme for structured linear programs with application to multicommodity network flows. Optimization (1997) 40:247–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T., Liu Z., Patriksson M. A dual scheme for traffic assignment problems. Optimization (1997) 42:323–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T., Patriksson M., Rydergren C., Pardalos P. M., Hearn D. W., Hager W. W. Applications of simplicial decomposition with nonlinear column generation to nonlinear network flows. Network Optimization. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (1997) 450(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 346–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T., Patriksson M., Strömberg A.-B. Ergodic convergence in subgradient optimization. Optim. Methods Software (1998) 9(1-3):93–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T., Patriksson M., Strömberg A.-B. Ergodic, primal convergence in dual subgradient schemes for convex programming. Math. Programming (1999) 86(2):283–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemaréchal C., Nemirovskii A. S., Nesterov Yu. E. New variants of bundle methods. Math. Programming (1995) 69(1):111–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nedić A., Bertsekas D. P. Incremental subgradient methods for nondifferentiable optimization. SIAM J. Optim. (2001) 12(1):109–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nedić A., Bertsekas D. P., Borkar V. S. Distributed asynchronous incremental subgradient methods. Inherently Parallel Algorithms in Feasibility and Optimization and Their Applications. Studies in Computational Mathematics (2001) 8(Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 381–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouorou A., Mahey P., Vial J.-Ph. A survey of algorithms for convex multicommodity flow problems. Management Sci. (2000) 46(1):126–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polyak B. T. Minimization of unsmooth functionals. Zh. Vychisl. Mat. i Mat. Fiz. (1969) 9:509–521(Russian). English transl. (1969) in U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 9(3) 14–29Google Scholar
  • Polyak B. T.Introduction to Optimization (1983) (Nauka, Moscow USSR) . English transl. 1987. Optimization Software Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen S., Sherali H. D. A class of convergent primal-dual subgradient algorithms for decomposable convex programs. Math. Programming (1986) 35(3):279–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Choi G. Recovery of primal solutions when using subgradient optimization methods to solve Lagrangian duals of linear programs. Oper. Res. Lett. (1996) 19:105–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shor N. Z.Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions (1979) (Naukova Dumka, Kiev (Russian)) . English transl., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1985)Google Scholar
  • Tatineni M., Edwards H., Boyce D. Comparison of disaggregate simplicial decomposition and Frank-Wolfe algorithms for user-optimal route choice. Transportation Res. Record (1998) 1617:157–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhurbenko N. G. Investigation of a class of algorithms for minimizing nonsmooth functions and their application to the solution of large-scale problems. (1977) . Dissertation, Cybernetics Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev, USSRGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.