On the Complexity of Pure-Strategy Nash Equilibria in Congestion and Local-Effect Games

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1080.0322

References

  • Ackermann H., Röglin H., Vöcking B. On the impact of combinatorial structure on congestion games. Proc. 47th Ann. IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2006a) Berkeley, CA:613–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackermann H., Röglin H., Vöcking B., Spirakis P. G., Mavronicolas M., Kontogiannis S. C. Pure Nash equilibria in player-specific and weighted congestion games. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2006b) 4286(Springer, Berlin) 50–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aland S., Dumrauf D., Gairing M., Monien B., Schoppmann F., Durand B., Thomas W. Exact price of anarchy for polynomial congestion games. Proc. 23rd Internat. Sympos. Theoretical Aspects of Comput. Sci. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2006) 3884(Springer, Berlin) 218–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Àlvarez C., Gabarró J., Serna M. J., Jedrzejowicz J., Szepietowski A. Pure Nash equilibria in games with a large number of actions. Proc. 30th Internat. Sympos. Math. Foundations of Comput. Sci. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2005) 3618(Springer, Berlin) 95–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Awerbuch B., Azar Y., Epstein A. The price of routing unsplittable flow. Proc. 37th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2005) Baltimore:57–66Google Scholar
  • Brandt F., Fischer F., Holzer M., Thomas W., Weil P. Symmetries and the complexity of pure Nash equilibrium. Proc. 24th Internat. Sympos. Theoretical Aspects Comput. Sci. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2007) 4393(Springer, Berlin) 212–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X., Deng X. 3-Nash is PPAD-complete. (2005) . Technical Report 05-134, Electronic Colloquium in Computational ComplexityGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X., Deng X. Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium. Proc. 47th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2006) Berkeley, CA:261–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daskalakis C., Papadimitriou C. H. Three-player games are hard. (2005) . Technical Report 05-139, Electronic Colloquium in Computational ComplexityGoogle Scholar
  • Daskalakis C., Goldberg P. W., Papadimitriou C. H. The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. Proc. 38th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2006) Seattle:71–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunkel J., Schulz A. S., Spirakis P. G., Mavronicolas M., Kontogiannis S. C. On the complexity of pure-strategy Nash equilibria in congestion and local-effect games. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2006) 4286(Springer, Berlin) 62–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fabrikant A., Papadimitriou C. H., Talwar K. The complexity of pure Nash equilibria. Proc. 36th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2004) Chicago, IL:604–612CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer F., Holzer M., Katzenbeisser S. The influence of neighbourhood and choice on the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria. Inform. Processing Lett. (2006) 99:239–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer S. T. A note on the complexity of local search problems. Inform. Processing Lett. (1995) 53(2):69–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fortune S., Hopcroft J. E., Wyllie J. The directed subgraph homeomorphism problem. Theoret. Comput. Sci. (1980) 10(2):111–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fotakis D., Kontogiannis S., Spirakis P. Selfish unsplittable flows. Theoret. Comput. Sci. (2005) 348(2):226–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gairing M., Monien B., Tiemann K., Bugliesi M., Preneel B., Sassone V., Wegener I. Routing (un-) splittable flow in games with player-specific linear latency functions. Proc. 33rd Internat. Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2006) 4051(Springer, Berlin) 501–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garey M. R., Johnson D. S.Computers and Intractibility. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (1979) (Freeman and Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Goemans M. X., Mirrokni V., Vetta A. Sink equilibria and convergence. Proc. 46th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2005) Pittsburgh:142–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg P. W., Papadimitriou C. H. Reducibility among equilibrium problems. Proc. 38th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2006) Seattle:61–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gottlob G., Greco G., Scarcello F. Pure Nash equilibria: Hard and easy games. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. (2005) 24:357–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ieong S., McGrew R., Nudelman E., Shoham Y., Sun Q. Fast and compact: A simple class of congestion games. Proc. 20th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence and the 17th Innovative Appl. Artificial Intelligence Conf. (2005) Pittsburgh:489–494Google Scholar
  • Johnson D. S., Papadimitriou C. H., Yannakakis M. How easy is local search? J. Comput. System Sci. (1988) 37:79–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leyton-Brown K., Tennenholtz M. Local-effect games. Proc. 18th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2003) Acapulco, Mexico:772–780Google Scholar
  • Libman L., Orda A. Atomic resource sharing in noncooperative networks. Telecommunication Systems (2001) 17:385–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyers C. A., Schulz A. S. The complexity of congestion games. (2008) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Milchtaich I. Congestion games with player-specific payoff functions. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 13:111–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milchtaich I., Spirakis P. G., Mavronicolas M., Kontogiannis S. C. The equilibrium existence problem in finite network congestion games. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2006) 4286(Springer, Berlin) 87–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monderer D., Shapley L. S. Potential games. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 14:124–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J. F. Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. (1951) 54:286–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R. W. A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Internat. J. Game Theory (1973a) 2:65–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R. W. The network equilibrium problem in integers. Networks (1973b) 3:53–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schäffer A. A., Yannakakis M. Simple local search problems that are hard to solve. SIAM J. Comput. (1991) 20:56–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoenebeck G., Vadhan S. P. The computational complexity of Nash equilibria in concisely represented games. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2006) Ann Arbor, MI:270–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shor M. Matching pennies. (2005) . Dictionary of Game Theory Terms, Game Theory .net. http://www.gametheory.net/dictionary/Games/MatchingPennies.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Yannakakis M., Aarts E., Lenstra J. K. Computational complexity. Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 19–55Chapter 2Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.