Tight Bounds for Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1080.0368

References

  • Chakrabarti S., Phillips C., Schulz A., Shmoys D., Stein C., Wein J. Improved scheduling algorithms for Minsum Criteria. Proc. 23rd Internat. Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP) (1996) (Springer, Berlin) 646–657Google Scholar
  • Chazelle B.The Discrepancy Method: Randomness and Complexity (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Chen B., Potts C., Woeginger G., Du D.-Z., Pardalos P. M. A review of machine scheduling: Complexity, algorithms, and approximability. Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization (1998) 3(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 21–169Google Scholar
  • Conway R., Maxwell W., Miller L.Theory of Scheduling (1967) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Czumaj A., Scheideler C. A new algorithmic approach to the general lovasz local lemma with applications to schedulung and satisfiability problems. Proc. 32 ACM Sympos. Theory Comput (STOC) (2000) (ACM Press, New York) 38–47Google Scholar
  • Feige U., Scheideler C. Improved bounds for acyclic job shop scheduling. Proc. 30th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (STOC) (1998) (ACM Press, New York) 624–633Google Scholar
  • Fishkin A., Jansen K., Mastrolilli M. On minimizing average weighted completion time: A PTAS for the job shop problem with release dates. Algorithms and Computation (2003) 2906(Springer, Berlin) 319–328Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Framinan J., Gupta J., Leisten R. A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004) 55:1243–1255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frieze A. On the length of the longest monotone subsequence of a random permutation. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1991) 1(2):301–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall L. A., Shmoys D. B., Wein J. Scheduling to minimize average completion time: Off–line and on–line algorithms. Proc. 7th Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (1996) (ACM-SIAM)142–151Google Scholar
  • Hall L. A., Schulz A. S., Shmoys D. B., Wein J. Scheduling to minimize average completion time: Off–line and on–line approximation algorithms. Math. Oper. Res. (1997) 22:513–544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen K., Solis-Oba R., Sviridenko M. Makespan minimization in job shops: A linear time approximation scheme. SIAM J. Discrete Math. (2003) 16:288–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler E. L., Lenstra J. K., Rinnooy Kan A. H. G., Shmoys D. B., Graves S., Rinnooy Kan A., Zipkin P. Sequencing and scheduling: Algorithms and complexity. Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science (1993) 4(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 445–522Google Scholar
  • Logan B. F., Shepp L. A. A variational problem for random young tableaux. Adv. Math. (1977) 26:206–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nawaz M., Enscore E., Ham I. A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine n-job flow-shop sequencing problem. OMEGA Internat. J. Management Sci. (1983) 11:91–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nowicki E., Smutnicki C. New results in the worst-case analysis for flow-shop scheduling. Discrete Appl. Math. (1993) 46:21–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nowicki E., Smutnicki C. Worst-case analysis of an approximation algorithm for flow-shop scheduling. Oper. Res. Lett. (1989) 8:171–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nowicki E., Smutnicki C. Worst-case analysis of Dannenbring's algorithm for flow-shop scheduling. Oper. Res. Lett. (1991) 10:473–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Potts C., Shmoys D., Williamson D. Permutation vs. nonpermutation flow shop schedules. Oper. Res. Lett. (1991) 10:281–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Queyranne M. Structure of a simple scheduling polyhedron. Math. Programming Ser. A (1993) 58(2):263–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Queyranne M., Sviridenko M. Approximation algorithms for shop scheduling problems with minsum objective. J. Scheduling (2002) 5:287–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raghavan P. Probabilistic construction of deterministic algorithms: Approximating packing integer programs. J. Comput. System Sci. (1988) 37:130–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Röck H., Schmidt G. Machine aggregation heuristics in shop-scheduling. Methods Oper. Res. (1983) 45:303–314Google Scholar
  • Sevast'janov S. On some geometric methods in scheduling theory: A survey. Discrete Appl. Math. (1994) 55:59–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrijver A.Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency (Algorithms and Combinatorics) (2003) 24(B)(Springer-Verlag, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Shmoys D., Stein C., Wein J. Improved approximation algorithms for shop scheduling problems. SIAM J. Comput. (1994) 23(3):617–632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smutnicki C. Some results of the worst-case analysis for flow shop scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 109:66–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sotelo D., Poggi de Aragão M. An approximation algorithm for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem via Erdős-Szekeres Theorem Extensions. (2008) . Working paper, Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  • Sviridenko M. A note on permutation flow shop problem. Ann. Oper. Res. (2004) 129:247–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vershik A. M., Kerov S. V. Asymptotics of the Plancherel measure of the symmetric group and the limit form of Young tableaux. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (1977) 233:1024–1027Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.