Earliest Arrival Flows with Multiple Sources

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1090.0382

References

  • Baumann N., Skutella M. Solving evacuation problems efficiently: Earliest arrival flows with multiple sources. Proc. 47th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2006) Berkeley, CA:399–408Google Scholar
  • Berlin G. N. The use of directed routes for assessing escape potential. Fire Tech. (1978) 14:126–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busaker R. G., Gowen P. J. A procedure for determining minimal-cost network flow patterns. (1961) . Technical Report 15, Operational Research Office, John Hopkins University, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  • Chalmet L. G., Francis R. L., Saunders P. B. Network models for building evacuation. Management Sci. (1982) 28:86–105LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer L. K. Faster algorithms for the quickest transshipment problem. SIAM J. Optim. (2001) 12:18–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer L., Iwata S. A push-relabel framework for submodular function minimization and applications to parametric optimization. Discrete Appl. Math. (2003) 131:311–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer L. K., Skutella M., Cook W. J., Schulz A. S. The quickest multicommodity flow problem. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (2002) 2337(Springer, Berlin) 36–53Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer L. K., Skutella M. Quickest flows over time. SIAM J. Comput. (2007) 36:1600–1630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer L. K., Tardos É. Efficient continuous-time dynamic network flow algorithms. Oper. Res. Lett. (1998) 23:71–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford L. R., Fulkerson D. R. Constructing maximal dynamic flows from static flows. Oper. Res. (1958) 6:419–433LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ford L. R., Fulkerson D. R.Flows in Networks (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gale D. Transient flows in networks. Michigan Math. J. (1959) 6:59–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallo G., Grigoriadis M. D., Tarjan R. E. A fast parametric maximum flow algorithm and applications. SIAM J. Comput. (1989) 18:30–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grötschel M., Lovász L., Schrijver A. Geometric algorithms and combinatorial optimization. Algorithms and Combinatorics (1988) 2(Springer, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Hajek B., Ogier R. G. Optimal dynamic routing in communication networks with continuous traffic. Networks (1984) 14:457–487CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamacher H. W., Tifecki S. On the use of lexicographic min cost flows in evacuation modeling. Naval Res. Logist. (1987) 34:487–503CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoppe B., Tardos É. Polynomial time algorithms for some evacuation problems. Proc. 5th Annual ACM–SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (1994) Arlington, VA:433–441Google Scholar
  • Hoppe B., Tardos É. The quickest transshipment problem. Math. Oper. Res. (2000) 25:36–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iri M. A new method of solving transportation-network problems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan (1960) 26:27–87Google Scholar
  • Iwata S. A fully combinatorial algorithm for submodular function minimization. J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B (2002) 84:203–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iwata S., Fleischer L., Fujishige S. A combinatorial strongly polynomial algorithm for minimizing submodular functions. J. ACM (2001) 48:761–777CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvis J. J., Ratliff H. D. Some equivalent objectives for dynamic network flow problems. Management Sci. (1982) 28:106–108LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jewel P. A. Optimal flow through networks. (1958) . Technical Report 8, Operations Research Center, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Klinz B. (1994) . Cited as personal communication in [Hoppe, B., É. Tardos. 2000. The quickest transshipment problem. Math. Oper. Res. 25 36–62.]Google Scholar
  • Megiddo N. Optimal flows in networks with multiple sources and sinks. Math. Programming (1974) 7:97–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Megiddo N. Combinatorial optimization with rational objective functions. Math. Oper. Res. (1979) 4:414–424LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Megiddo N. Applying parallel computation algorithms in the design of serial algorithms. J. ACM (1983) 30:852–865CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minieka E. Maximal, lexicographic, and dynamic network flows. Oper. Res. (1973) 21:517–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagano K. A faster parametric submodular function minimization algorithm and applications. (2007) . Mathematical Engineering Technical Reports METR 2007-43, University of Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  • Orlin J. B., Fischetti M., Williamson D. P. A faster strongly polynomial time algorithm for submodular function minimization. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (2007) 4513(Springer, Berlin) 240–251Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Padberg M.Linear Optimization and Extensions (1995) (Springer, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Richardson D., Tardos É. (2002) . Cited as personal communication in [Fleischer, L. K., M. Skutella. 2007. Quickest flows over time. SIAM J. Comput. 36 1600–1630.]Google Scholar
  • Schrijver A. A combinatorial algorithm minimizing submodular functions in strongly polynomial time. J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B (2000) 80:346–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrijver A.Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency (2003) (Springer, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Skutella M., Cook W., Lovász L., Vygen J. An introduction to network flows over time. Research Trends in Combinatorial Optimization (2009) (Springer, Berlin) 451–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjandra S. Dynamic network optimization with application to the evacuation problem. (2003) . Ph.D. thesis, Univeristät Kaiserslautern, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Wilkinson W. L. An algorithm for universal maximal dynamic flows in a network. Oper. Res. (1971) 19:1602–1612LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.