The UGC Hardness Threshold of the Lp Grothendieck Problem

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1090.0425

References

  • Achlioptas D., Naor A., Peres Y. Rigorous location of phase transitions in hard optimization problems. Nature (2005) 435:759–764CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alon N., Berger E. The Grothendieck constant of random and pseudo-random graphs. Discrete Optim. (2008) 5(2):323–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alon N., Naor A. Approximating the cut-norm via Grothendieck's inequality. SIAM J. Comput. (2006) 35(4):787–803CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alon N., Makarychev K., Makarychev Y., Naor A. Quadratic forms on graphs. Inventiones Math. (2006) 163(3):499–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora S., Berger E., Kindler G., Hazan E., Safra S. On non-approximability for quadratic programs. Proc. 46th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2005) (IEEE Computer Society)206–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Artin E.The Gamma Function (1964) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Athena Series: Selected Topics in Mathematics[Translated by Michael Butler]Google Scholar
  • Bachas C. P. Computer-intractability of the frustration model of a spin glass. J. Phys. A: Math. General (1984) 17:709–712CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal N., Blum A., Chawla S. Correlation clustering. Machine Learning (2004) 56(1–3):89–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal N., Bravyi S., Terhal B. M. Classical approximation schemes for the ground-state energy of quantum and classical lsing spin Hamiltonians on planar graphs. Quantum Inform. Comput. (2009) 9(7 and 8):0701–0720Google Scholar
  • Barahona F. On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models. J. Phys. A: Math. General (1981) 15:3241–3253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellare M., Rogaway P. The complexity of approximating a nonlinear program. Math. Programming Ser. A (1995) 69(3):429–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben Arous G., Dembo A., Guionnet A. Aging of spherical spin glasses. Probab. Theory Related Fields (2001) 120(1):1–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bieche L., Maynard R., Rammal R., Uhry J. P. On the ground states of the frustration model of a spin glass by a matching method of graph theory. J. Phys. A: Math. General (1980) 13:2553–2576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brieden A. Geometric optimization problems likely not contained in 𝔸ℙ𝕏. Discrete Computational Geometry (2002) 28(2):201–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charikar M., Wirth A. Maximizing quadratic programs: Extending Grothendieck's inequality. Proc. 45th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2004) (IEEE Computer Society)54–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charikar M., Makarychev K., Makarychev Y. Near-optimal algorithms for unique games (extended abstract). Proc. 38th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2006) (ACM, New York) 205–214Google Scholar
  • de Klerk E., Laurent M., Parrilo P. A. A PTAS for the minimization of polynomials of fixed degree over the simplex. Theoret. Comput. Sci. (2006) 361(2–3):210–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diestel J., Jarchow H., Tonge A.Absolutely Summing Operators, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (1995) 43(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feige U., Goemans M. Approximating the value of two proper proof systems with applications to MAX-2SAT and MAX-DICUT. Proc. Third Israel Sympos. Theory Comput. Systems (1995) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC) 182–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feige U., Langberg M. The RPR2 rounding technique for semidefinite programs. J. Algorithms (2006) 60(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feige U., Lovász L. Two-prover one-round proof systems, their power and their problems. Proc. 24th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (1992) (ACM, New York) 733–744Google Scholar
  • Goemans M. X., Williamson D. P. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. (1995) 42(6):1115–1145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grötschel M., Lovász L., Schrijver A.Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, Vol.2. Algorithms and Combinatorics (1993) 2nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall P. Rates of convergence in the central limit theorem. Research Notes in Mathematics (1982) 62(Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston) Google Scholar
  • Halperin E., Hazan E. HAPLOFREQ—Estimating haplotype frequencies efficiently. J. Comput. Biol. (2006) 13(2):481–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson W. B., Lindenstrauss J. Basic concepts in the geometry of Banach spaces. Handbook of the Geometry of Banach Spaces (2001) I(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 1–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karger D., Motwani R., Sudan M. Approximate graph coloring by semidefinite programming. J. ACM (1998) 45(2):246–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khot S. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. Proc. Thirty-Fourth Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2002) (ACM, New York) 767–775 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=510017Google Scholar
  • Khot S., O'Donnell R. SDP gaps and UGC-hardness for MAXCUTGAIN. Proc. 47th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2006) (IEEE Computer Society)217–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machta J. The computational complexity of pattern formation. J. Statist. Phys. (1993) 70:949–966CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Megretski A. Relaxations of quadratic programs in operator theory and system analysis. Systems, Approximation, Singular Integral Operators, and Related Topics (Bordeaux, 2000), Vol. 129. Operator Theory Advances and Applications. (2001) (Birkhäuser, Basel) 365–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemirovski A., Roos C., Terlaky T. On maximization of quadratic form over intersection of ellipsoids with common center. Math. Program. Ser. A (1999) 86(3):463–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y. Global quadratic optimization via conic relaxation. (1998) . Working paper, CORE. http://www.core.ucl.ac.be/services/psfiles/dp98/dp9860.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Sompolinsky H., Zippelius A. Dynamic theory of the spin-glass phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1981) 47(5):359–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Beek P. An application of Fourier methods to the problem of sharpening the Berry-Esseen inequality. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Gebiete (1972) 23:187–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolfram S. Undecidability and intractability in theoretical physics. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1985) 54:735–738CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.