Stackelberg Routing in Arbitrary Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1100.0442

References

  • Babaioff M., Kleinberg R., Papadimitriou C. H. Congestion games with malicious players. Proc. 8th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2007) (ACM, New York) 103–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckmann M., McGuire C. B., Winsten C. B.Studies in the Economics and Transportation (1956) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Braess D. Über ein Paradoxon der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmenforschung (1968) 11:258–268Google Scholar
  • Chen P.-A., Kempe D. Altruism, selfishness, and spite in traffic routing. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2008) (ACM, New York) 140–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole R., Dodis Y., Roughgarden T. Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users. Proc. 35th ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2003) (ACM, New York) 521–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correa J. R., Stier-Moses N. E. Stackelberg routing in atomic network games. (2007) . Technical Report DRO-2007-03, Columbia Business School, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Correa J. R., Schulz A. S., Stier-Moses N. E. Selfish routing in capacitated networks. Math. Oper. Res. (2004) 29:961–976LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Correa J. R., Schulz A. S., Stier-Moses N. E. On the inefficiency of equilibria in congestion games. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Integer Programming Combin. Optim. (2005) (Springer, Berlin) 167–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correa J. R., Schulz A. S., Stier-Moses N. E. Fast, fair, and efficient flows in networks. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(2):215–225LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dubey P. Inefficiency of Nash equilibria. Math. Oper. Res. (1986) 11:1–8LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer L. K., Jain K., Mahdian M. Tolls for heterogeneous selfish users in multicommodity networks and generalized congestion games. Proc. 45th IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2004) (IEEE, Washington, DC) 277–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fotakis D. Stackelberg strategies for atomic congestion games. Proc. 15th Eur. Sympos. Algorithms (2007) 4698(Springer, Berlin) 299–310Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallo G., Sandi C., Sodini C. An algorithm for the min concave cost flow problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1980) 4(4):248–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harks T. Stackelberg strategies and collusion in network games with splittable flow. Proc. 6th Workshop Approximation Online Algorithms (2008) (Springer, Berlin) 133–146Google Scholar
  • Hearn D. W., Ramana M. V., Marcotte P., Nguyen S. Solving congestion toll pricing models. Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modelling (1998) (Springer, Berlin) 109–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaporis A. C., Spirakis P. G. The price of optimum in Stackelberg games on arbitrary single commodity networks and latency functions. Proc. 18th ACM Sympos. Parallelism Algorithms Architectures (2006) (ACM, New York) 19–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karakostas G., Kolliopoulos S. G. Edge pricing of multicommodity networks for heterogeneous selfish users. Proc. 45th IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2004) (IEEE, Washington, DC) 268–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karakostas G., Kolliopoulos S. G. Stackelberg strategies for selfish routing in general multicommodity networks. Algorithmica (2009) 53(1):132–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight F. H. Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost. Quart. J. Econom. (1924) 38(4):582–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knuth D. E.The Art of Computer Programming (1997) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Korilis Y. A., Lazar A. A., Orda A. Achieving network optima using Stackelberg routing strategies. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (1997) 5(1):161–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koutsoupias E., Papadimitriou C. H., Meines C., Tison S. Worst-case equilibria. Proc. 16th Sympos. Theoret. Aspects Comput. Sci. (1999) (Springer, Berlin) 404–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar V. S. A., Marathe M. V. Improved results for Stackelberg scheduling strategies. Proc. 33rd Internat. Colloquium Automata, Languages Programming (2002) (Springer, Berlin) 776–787CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin H., Roughgarden T., Tardos É., Walkover A. Braess's paradox, Fibonacci numbers, and exponential inapproximability. Proc. 32nd Internat. Colloquium Automata, Languages Programming (2005) (Springer, Berlin) 497–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perakis G. The “price of anarchy” under nonlinear and asymmetric costs. Math. Oper. Res. (2007) 32(3):614–628LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. Selfish routing. (2002) . Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology. J. Comput. System Sci. (2003) 67(2):341–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. Stackelberg scheduling strategies. SIAM J. Comput. (2004) 33(2):332–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. The maximum latency of selfish routing. Proc. 15th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2004) (SIAM, Philadelphia) 980–981Google Scholar
  • Roughgarden T.Selfish Routing and the Price of Anarchy (2005) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. On the severity of Braess's paradox: Designing networks for selfish users is hard. J. Comput. System Sci. (2006) 72(5):922–953CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T., Tardos É. How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM (2002) 49(2):236–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma Y., Williamson D. Stackelberg thresholds in network routing games or the value of altruism. Proc. 8th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2007) (ACM, New York) 93–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. J. The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transportation Res. (1979a) 13(4):295–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. J. The marginal cost taxation of a transportation network. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological (1979b) 13(3):237–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swamy C. The effectiveness of Stackelberg strategies and tolls for network congestion games. Proc. 18th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2007) (SIAM, Philadelphia) 1133–1142Google Scholar
  • Wardrop J. G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Inst. Civil Engineers (1952) 1(Part II):325–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H., Huang H.-J. The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological (2004) 38(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.