Modulated Branching Processes, Origins of Power Laws, and Queueing Duality

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1100.0464

References

  • Adamic L. A., Huberman B. A. Zipf's law and the Internet. Glottometrics (2002) 3:143–150Google Scholar
  • Allen A. P., Li B., Charnov E. L. Population fluctuations, power laws and mixtures of lognormal distributions. Ecology Lett. (2001) 4(1):1–3CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaral L. A. N., Buldyrev S. V., Havlin S., Leschhorn H., Maass P., Salinger M. A., Stanley H. E., Stanley M. H. Scaling behavior in economics: Empirical results for company growth. J. Physique I (1997) 7(April):621–633CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrhenius O. Species and area. J. Ecology (1921) 9(1):95–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asmussen S.Applied Probability and Queues (1987) 2nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Asmussen S., Fiorini P., Lipsky L., Rolski T., Sheahan R. Asymptotic behavior of total times for jobs that must start over if a failure occurs. Math. Oper. Res. (2008) 33(4):932–944LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Athreya K. B., Ney P. E.Branching Processes (1972) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Auerbach F. Das Gesetz der bevölkerungskonzentration. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen (1913) 59:73–76Google Scholar
  • Barabási A. L., Albert R., Jeong H. Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks. Physica A (1999) 272:173–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billingsley P.Probability and Measure (1995) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Blank A., Solomon S. Power laws in cities population, financial markets and Internet sites (scaling in systems with a variable number of components). Physica A (2000) 287:279–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breslau L., Cao P., Fan L., Phillips G., Shenker S. Web caching and Zipf-like distributions: Evidence and implications. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 1999 (1999) 1New York:126–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brujic J., Hermans R. I., Walther Z. K. A., Fernandez J. M. Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals signatures of glassy dynamics in the energy landscape of ubiquitin. Nature Phys. (2006) 2(4):282–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklew J. A.Large Deviation Techniques in Decision, Simulation, and Estimation (1990) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Carlson J. M., Doyle J. Highly optimized tolerance: A mechanism for power laws in designed systems. Phys. Rev. E (1999) 60(2):1412–1427CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Champernowne D. A model of income distribution. Econom. J. (1953) 63:318–351Google Scholar
  • Chang C.-S. Stability, queue length, and delay of deterministic and stochastic queueing networks. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1994) 39(5):913–931CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connor E. F., McCoy E. D. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Amer. Naturalist (1979) 113(6):791–833CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crovella M., Bestavros A. Self-similarity in World Wide Web traffic: Evidence and possible causes. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (1997) 5(6):835–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunha C., Bestavros A., Crovella M. Characteristics of World Wide Web client-based traces. (1995) . Technical Report TR-95-010, Department of Computer Science, Boston University, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Dagum C. A systematic approach to the generation of income distribution models. J. Income Distribution (1997) 6(1):105–126Google Scholar
  • de Haan L., Resnick S. I., Rootzén H., de Vries C. G. Extremal behaviour of solutions to a stochastic difference equation with applications to ARCH processes. Stochastic Processes Appl. (1989) 32(2):213–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Saporta B. Tail of the stationary solution of the stochastic equation yn+1 = anyn + bn with Markovian coefficients. Stochastic Processes Appl. (2005) 115(12):1954–1978CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dembo A., Zeitouni O.Large Deviations Techniques and Applications (1998) 2nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Downey A. B. The structural cause of file size distributions. Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS 2001 (2001) New York:328–329Google Scholar
  • Faloutsos M., Faloutsos P., Faloutsos C. On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 1999 (1999) Cambridge, MA:251–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiorini P. M., Sheahan R., Lipsky L. On unreliable computing systems when heavy-tails appear as a result of the recovery procedure. Proc. Conf. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. (2005) 33MAMA 2005 WorkshopBanff, Alberta, Canada(2):15–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X. Zipf's law for cities: An explanation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):739–767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X., Gopikrishnan P., Plerou V., Stanley H. E. A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations. Nature (2003) 423(6937):267–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ganesh A., O'Connell N., Wischik D.Big Queues (2004) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn P. W., Whitt W. Logarithmic asymptotics for steady-state tail probabilities in a single-server queue. Stud. Appl. Probab. (1994) 31:131–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldie C. M. Implicit renewal theory and tails of solutions of random equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1991) 1(1):126–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gong W.-B., Liu Y., Misra V., Towsley D. Self-similarity and long range dependence on the Internet: A second look at the evidence, origins and implications. Comput. Networks (2005) 48(3):377–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman B. A., Adamic L. A. Evolutionary dynamics of the World Wide Web. (1999) . Technical report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 1999. (Appears as the brief communication, “Growth dynamics of the World Wide Web” in Nature 399 130.)Google Scholar
  • Huberman B. A., Adamic L. A. The nature of markets in the World Wide Web. Quart. J. Electronic Commerce (2000) 1:5–12Google Scholar
  • Huynen M. A., van Nimwegen E. The frequency distribution of gene family sizes in complete genomes. Molecular Biol. Evolution (1998) 15(5):583–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ioannides Y. M., Overman H. G. Zipf's law for cities: An empirical examination. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. (2003) 33(2):127–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Lazar A. On the dependence of the queue tail distribution on multiple time scales of ATM multiplexers. Proc. Conf. Inform. Sci. Systems (1995) Baltimore:435–440Google Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Momčilović P. Asymptotic loss probability in a finite buffer fluid queue with heterogeneous heavy-tailed on-off processes. Ann. Appl. Probab. (2003) 13(2):576–603CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Olvera-Cravioto M. Information ranking and power laws on trees. Adv. Appl. Probab. (2010) 42(4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Tan J. Modulated branching processes and origins of power laws. Proc. 44th Annual Allerton Conf. Comm., Control, Comput. (2006) (University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana–Champaign) Google Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Tan J. Is ALOHA causing power law delays? Proc. 20th Internat. Teletraffic Congress 2007 (2007) 4516Ottawa, Canada(Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 1149–1160Lecture Notes Comput. Sci.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Tan J. Can retransmissions of superexponential documents cause subexponential delays? Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2007 (2007) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 892–900CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Tan J. Characterizing heavy-tailed distributions induced by retransmissions. (2007) . Technical Report EE2007-09-07, Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York (September). Eprint arXiv:10709.1138. http://arxiv.org/labs/10709.1138Google Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Tan J. Modulated branching processes, origins of power laws and queueing duality. (2007) . Technical Report EE2007-09-25, Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York (September). Eprint arXiv:0709.4297. http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4297Google Scholar
  • Jelenković P. R., Lazar A. A., Semret N. The effect of multiple time scales and subexponentiality in MPEG video streams on queueing behavior. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. (1997) 15(6):1052–1071CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeley J. E. Relating species abundance distributions to species-area curves in two Mediterranean-type shrublands. Diversity Distributions (2003) 9:253–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kesten H. Random difference equations and renewal theory for products of random matrices. Acta Mathematica (1973) 131:207–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar R., Raghavan P., Rajagopalan S., Sivakumar D., Tomkins A., Upfal E. Stochastic models for the Web graph. Proc. 41st Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2000) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 57–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leland W. E., Willinger W., Taqqu M. S., Wilson D. V. On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Comm. Rev. (1995) 25(1):202–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy M., Solomon S. Dynamical explanation for the emergence of power law in a stock market model. Internat. J. Modern Phys. C (1996) 7(1):65–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy M., Solomon S. Power laws are logarithmic Boltzmann laws. Internat. J. Modern Phys. C (1996) 7(4):595–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy M., Solomon S. Spontaneous scaling emergence in generic stochastic systems. Internat. J. Modern Phys. C (1996) 7(5):745–756CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loynes R. M. The stability of a queue with non-independent inter-arrival and service times. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. (1962) 58:497–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luscombe N. M., Qian J., Zhang Z., Johnson T., Gerstein M. The dominance of the population by a selected few: Power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties. Genome Biol. (2002) 3(8). Research0040.0041–0040.0047CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandelbrot B. The Pareto-Levy law and the distribution of income. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1960) 1:79–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Medina A., Matta I., Byers J. On the origin of power laws in Internet topologies. Comput. Comm. Rev. (2000) 30(2):18–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitzenmacher M. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math. (2004a) 1(2):226–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitzenmacher M. Dynamic models for file sizes and double Pareto distributions. Internet Math. (2004b) 1(3):305–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olvera-Cravioto M., Blanchet J., Glynn P. W. On the transition from heavy traffic to heavy tails for the M/G/1 queue: The regularly varying case. Ann. Appl. Probab. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Pareto V.Cours d'Economie Politique (1896) (Droz, Geneva) Google Scholar
  • Parr J. A note on the size distribution of cities over time. J. Urban Econom. (1985) 18(2):199–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plotkin J. B., Potts M. D., Yu D. W., Bunyavejchewin S., Condit R., Foster R., Hubbell S., et al. Predicting species diversity in tropical forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2000) 97(20):10850–10854CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preston F. W. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology (1962) 43(2):185–215410432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed W. J. The Pareto, Zipf and other power laws. Econom. Lett. (2001) 74:15–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed W. J. The Pareto law of incomes—An explanation and an extension. Physica A (2003) 319:469–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed W. J., Hughes B. D. From gene families and genera to incomes and Internet file sizes: Why power laws are so common in nature. Phys. Rev. E (2002) 66(6):67–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed W. J., Jorgensen M. The double Pareto—Lognormal distribution—A new parametric model for size distributions. Comm. Statist.: Theory Methods (2004) 33(8):1733–1753CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen K. T., Resnick M. The size distribution of cities: An examination of the Pareto law and primacy. J. Urban Econom. (1980) 8(2):165–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rzhetsky A., Gomez S. M. Birth of scale-free molecular networks and the number of distinct DNA and protein domains per genome. Bioinformatics (2001) 17:988–996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sornette D., Cont R. Convergent multiplicative processes repelled from zero: Power laws and truncated power laws. J. Physique I (1997) 7(3):431–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wichmann S. On the power-law distribution of language family sizes. J. Linguistics (2005) 41(1):117–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zipf G.Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort (1949) (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.