Near-Optimal Solutions and Large Integrality Gaps for Almost All Instances of Single-Machine Precedence-Constrained Scheduling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1100.0479

References

  • Ambühl C., Mastrolilli M., Svensson O. Inapproximability results for sparsest cut, optimal linear arrangement, and precedence constrained scheduling. Proc. 48th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS 2007) (2007) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA) 329–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal N., Khot S. Optimal long code test with one free bit. Proc. 50th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS 2009) (2009) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA) 453–462CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chekuri C., Motwani R. Precedence constrained scheduling to minimize sum of weighted completion times on a single machine. Discrete Appl. Math. (1999) 98(1–2):29–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chudak F. A., Hochbaum D. S. A half-integral linear programming relaxation for scheduling precedence-constrained jobs on a single machine. Oper. Res. Lett. (1999) 25(5):199–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correa J. R., Schulz A. S. Single-machine scheduling with precedence constraints. Math. Oper. Res. (2005) 30(4):1005–1021LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eastman W. L., Even S., Isaacs I. M. Bounds for the optimal scheduling of n jobs on m processors. Management Sci. (1964) 11(2):268–279LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdős P., Rényi A. On random graphs I. Publicationes Mathematicae (1959) 6:290–297Google Scholar
  • Gallo G., Grigoriadis M. D., Tarjan R. E. A fast parametric maximum flow algorithm and applications. SIAM J. Comput. (1989) 18(1):30–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goemans M. X., Williamson D. P. Two-dimensional Gantt charts and a scheduling algorithm of Lawler. SIAM J. Discrete Math. (2000) 13(3):281–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham R. L., Lawler E. L., Lenstra J. K., Rinnooy Kan A. H. G. Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey. Ann. Discrete Math. (1979) 5:287–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall L. A., Schulz A. S., Shmoys D. B., Wein J. Scheduling to minimize average completion time: Off-line and on-line approximation algorithms. Math. Oper. Res. (1997) 22(3):513–544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall P. On representatives of subsets. J. London Math. Soc. (1935) 10(1):26–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khot S. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. Proc. 34th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (STOC 2002) (2002) (ACM, New York) 767–775CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler E. L. Sequencing jobs to minimize total weighted completion time subject to precedence constraints. Ann. Discrete Math. (1978) 2:75–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenstra J. K., Rinnooy Kan A. H. G. Complexity of scheduling under precedence constraints. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(1):22–35LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Margot F., Queyranne M., Wang Y. Decompositions, network flows, and a precedence constrained single-machine scheduling problem. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(6):981–992LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mitzenmacher M., Upfal E.Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis (2005) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Picard J.-C., Queyranne M. On the structure of all minimum cuts in a network and applications. Math. Programming Stud. (1980) 13:8–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Potts C. N. An algorithm for the single machine sequencing problem with precedence constraints. Math. Programming Stud. (1980) 13:78–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Queyranne M., Wang Y. Single-machine scheduling polyhedra with precedence constraints. Math. Oper. Res. (1991) 16(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sidney J. B. Decomposition algorithms for single-machine sequencing with precedence constraints and deferral costs. Oper. Res. (1975) 23(2):283–298LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith W. E. Various optimizers for single-stage production. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1956) 3(1-2):59–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woeginger G. J. On the approximability of average completion time scheduling under precedence constraints. Discrete Appl. Math. (2003) 131(1):237–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.