The Chvátal-Gomory Closure of a Strictly Convex Body

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1110.0488

References

  • Abhishek K., Leyffer S., Linderoth J. T. FilMINT: An outer-approximation-based solver for nonlinear mixed integer programs. (2006) . Preprint ANL/MCS-P1374-0906, Argonne National Laboratory, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A., Narayanan V. The submodular knapsack polytope. Discrete Optim. (2009) 6(4):333–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A., Narayanan V. Conic mixed-integer rounding cuts. Math. Programming (2010) 122(1):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A., Narayanan V. Lifting for conic mixed-integer programming. Math. Programming Ser. B (2011) 126(2):351–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonami P., Kilinç M., Linderoth J. Algorithms and software for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs. (2009) . Technical Report 1664, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin–Madison, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  • Bonami P., Biegler L. T., Conn A. R., Cornuéjols G., Grossmann I. E., Laird C. D., Lee J., et al. An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs. Discrete Optim. (2008) 5(2):186–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ceria S., Soares J. Convex programming for disjunctive convex optimization. Math. Programming (1999) 86(3):595–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Çezik M. T., Iyengar G. Cuts for mixed 0-1 conic programming. Math. Programming (2005) 104(1):179–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chvátal V. Edmonds polytopes and a hierarchy of combinatorial problems. Discrete Math. (1973) 4(4):305–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook W. J., Cunningham W. H., Pulleyblank W. R., Schrijver A.Combinatorial Optimization (1998) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Cornuejols G., Conforti M., Zambelli G., Juerger M., Liebling T., Naddef D., Pulleyblank W., Reinelt D., Rinaldi D., Wolsey L. Polyhedral approaches to mixed integer linear programming. 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958–2008 (2010) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) 343–386Google Scholar
  • Dey S. S., Vielma J. P., Eisenbrand F., Shepherd F. B. The Chvátal-Gomory closure of an ellipsoid is a polyhedron. Proc. 14th Conf. Integer Programming Combinatorial Optim. (IPCO 2010), Vol. 6080 (2010) (Springer, New York) 327–340Lecture Notes in Computer Science http://www.pitt.edu/∼jvielma/publications/#CG_IPCO_10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmonds J. Paths, trees, and flowers. Canadian J. Math. (1965) 17:449–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frangioni A., Gentile C. Perspective cuts for a class of convex 0-1 mixed integer programs. Math. Programming (2006) 106(2):225–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomory R. E. An algorithm for integer solutions to linear programs. Recent Advances in Mathematical Programming. (1963) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 269–302Google Scholar
  • Gomory R. E. Outline of an algorithm for integer solutions to linear programs. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1958) 64(5):275–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossmann I. E., Lee S. Generalized convex disjunctive programming: Nonlinear convex hull relaxation. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2003) 26(1):83–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Günlük O., Linderoth J. Perspective relaxation of mixed integer nonlinear programs with indicator variables. Math. Programming, Ser. B (2010) 124(1-2):183–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Günlük O., Lee J., Weismantel R. MINLP strengthening for separable convex quadratic transportation-cost UFL. (2007) . IBM Research Report RC24213, IBM, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Hemmecke R., Köppe M., Lee J., Weismantel R., Juerger M., Liebling T., Naddef D., Pulleyblank W., Reinelt D., Rinaldi D., Wolsey L. Nonlinear integer programming. 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958–2008 (2010) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) 561–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiriart-Urruty J.-B., Lemaréchal C.Fundamentals of Convex Analysis (2001) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L., Savelsbergh M. W. P. Progress in linear programming-based algorithms for integer programming: An exposition. INFORMS J. Comput. (2000) 12(1):2–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Letchford A. N., Sørensen M. M., Lodi A., Panconesi A., Rinaldi G. Binary positive semidefinite matrices and associated integer polytopes. Proc. 13th Internat. Conf. Integer Programming Combinatorial Optim., Vol. 5035 (2008) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) 125–139Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leyffer S., Linderoth J. T., Luedtke J., Miller A., Munson T. Applications and algorithms for mixed integer nonlinear programming. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. (2009) 180(1):012014CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marchand H., Martin A., Weismantel R., Wolsey L. A. Cutting planes in integer and mixed integer programming. Discrete Appl. Math. (2002) 123(1-3):397–446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemhauser G. L., Wolsey L. A.Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (1988) (Wiley-Interscience, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richard J.-P.P., Tawarmalani M. Lifting inequalities: A framework for generating strong cuts for nonlinear programs. Math. Programming (2010) 121(1):61–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrijver A. On cutting planes. Ann. Discrete Math. (1980) 9:291–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrijver A.Theory of Linear and Integer Programming (1986) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Stubbs R. A., Mehrotra S. A branch-and-cut method for 0-1 mixed convex programming. Math. Programming (1999) 86(3):515–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.