Optimal Lower Bounds for Anonymous Scheduling Mechanisms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1110.0534

References

  • Aggarwal G., Fiat A., Goldberg A. V., Hartline J. D., Immorlica N., Sudan M. Derandomization of auctions. Proc. 37th ACM Sympos. Theory of Comput. (STOC) (2005) (ACM Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Archer A., Tardos E. Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents. Proc. 42nd IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS) (2001) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 482–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Chatterji S., Lavi R., Mu'alem A., Nisan N., Sen A. Weak monotonicity characterizes deterministic dominant-strategy implementation. Econometrica (2006) 74(4):1109–1132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christodoulou G., Kovacs A. A deterministic truthful PTAS for scheduling related machines. Proc. 21st ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (2010) (SIAM, Philadelphia) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christodoulou G., Koutsoupias E., Kovács A. Mechanism design for fractional scheduling on unrelated machines. ACM Trans. Algorithms (TALG) (2010) 6(2):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christodoulou G., Koutsoupias E., Vidali A. A characterization of 2-player mechanisms for scheduling. Proc. 16th Eur. Sympos. Algorithms (ESA) (2008) (Springer LNCS, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christodoulou G., Koutsoupias E., Vidali A. A lower bound for scheduling mechanisms. Algorithmica (2009) 55(4):729–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhangwatnotai P., Dobzinski S., Dughmi S., Roughgarden T. Truthful approximation schemes for single-parameter agents. Proc. IEEE 49th IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS) (2008) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobzinski S., Sundararajan M. On characterizations of truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions and scheduling. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM-EC) (2008) (ACM Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eastman W. L., Even S., Isaacs I. M. Bounds for the optimal scheduling of n jobs on m processors. Management Sci. (1964) 11(2):268–279LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koutsoupias E., Vidali A. A lower bound of 1+phi for truthful scheduling mechanisms. Proc. 32nd Internat. Sympos. Math. Foundations Comput. Sci. (MFCS) (2007) (Springer LNCS, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavi R., Swamy C. Truthful mechanism design for multidimensional scheduling via cycle monotonicity. Games and Economic Behavior (2009) 67(1):99–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mu'alem A., Schapira M. Setting lower bounds on truthfulness: Extended abstract. Proc. 18th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (2007) (SIAM, Philadephia) Google Scholar
  • Nisan N., Ronen A. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games Econom. Behav. (2001) 35(1–2):166–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts K., Laffont J.-J. The characterization of implementable choice rules. Aggregation Revelation Preferences (1979) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 321–348Google Scholar
  • Yu C. Truthful mechanisms for two-range-values variant of unrelated scheduling. Theoretical Comput. Sci. (2009) 410(21–23):2196–2206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.