On the Existence of Pure Nash Equilibria in Weighted Congestion Games

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1120.0543

References

  • Ackermann H, Röglin H, Vöcking B. Pure Nash equilibria in player-specific and weighted congestion games. Theoret. Comput. Sci. (2009) 410(17):1552–1563CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackermann H, Skopalik A, Deng X, Graham F. On the complexity of pure Nash equilibria in player-specific network congestion games. Proc. 3rd Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom., LNCS (2007) 4858:419–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aland S, Dumrauf D, Gairing M, Monien B, Schoppmann F, Durand B, Thomas W. Exact price of anarchy for polynomial congestion games. Proc. 23rd Internat. Sympos. Theoretical Aspects Comput. Sci., LNCS (2006) 3884:218–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andelman N, Feldman M, Mansour Y. Strong price of anarchy. Games Econom. Behav. (2009) 65(2):289–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anshelevich E, Dasgupta A, Kleinberg J, Tardos É, Wexler T, Roughgarden T. The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. SIAM J. Comput. (2008) 38(4):1602–1623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Awerbuch B, Azar Y, Epstein A, Gabow HN, Fagin R. The price of routing unsplittable flow. Proc. 37th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2005) (ACM Press)57–66Google Scholar
  • Balakrishnan VK. Introductory Discrete Mathematics (1996) (Dover Publications, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bhaskar U, Fleischer L, Hoy D, Huang C, Mathieu C. Equilibria of atomic flow games are not unique. Proc. 20th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2009) (SIAM, Philadelphia) 748–757CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhawalkar K, Gairing M, Roughgarden T, de Berg M, Meyer U. Weighted congestion games: Price of anarchy, universal worst-case examples, and tightness. Proc. 18th Annual Eur. Sympos. Algorithms, Part II, LNCS (2010) 6347:17–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Public Roads Traffic assignment manual. (1964) . U.S. Department of Commerce, Urban Planning Division, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H-L, Roughgarden T. Network design with weighted players. Theory Comput. Syst. (2009) 45(2):302–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christodoulou G, Koutsoupias E, Gabow HN, Fagin R. The price of anarchy of finite congestion games. Proc. 37th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2005) 67–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunkel J, Schulz A. On the complexity of pure-strategy Nash equilibria in congestion and local-effect games. Math. Oper. Res. (2008) 33(4):851–868LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Even-Dar E, Kesselman A, Mansour Y. Convergence time to Nash equilibrium in load balancing. ACM Trans. Algorithms (2007) 3(3):32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fotakis D, Kontogiannis S, Koutsoupias E, Mavronicolas M, Spirakis P, Widmayer P, Triguero F, Morales R, Hennessy M, Eidenbenz S, Conejo R. The structure and complexity of Nash equilibria for a selfish routing game. Proc. 29th Internat. Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, LNCS (2002) 2380:123–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fotakis D, Kontogiannis S, Spirakis P. Selfish unsplittable flows. Theoret. Comput. Sci. (2005) 348(2--3):226–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fotakis D, Kontogiannis S, Spirakis P, Bugliesi M, Preneel B, Sassone V, Wegener I. Atomic congestion games among coalitions. Proc. 33rd Internat. Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, LNCS (2006) 4052:572–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gairing M, Monien B, Tiemann K, Bugliesi M, Preneel B, Sassone V, Wegener I. Routing (un-)splittable flow in games with player-specific linear latency functions. Proc. 33rd Internat. Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, LNCS (2006) 4051:501–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goemans M, Mirrokni V, Vetta A. Sink equilibria and convergence. Proc. 46th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2005) 142–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harks T, Klimm M, Abramsky S, Gavoille C, Kirchner C, Meyer auf der Heide F, Spirakis P. On the existence of pure Nash equilibria in weighted congestion games. Proc. 37th Internat. Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, LNCS (2010) 6198:79–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harks T, Klimm M, Möhring R, Leonardi S. Strong Nash equilibria in games with the lexicographical improvement property. Proc. 5th Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom., LNCS (2009) 5929:463–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harks T, Klimm M, Möhring R. Characterizing the existence of potential functions in weighted congestion games. Theory Comput. Systems (2011) 49(1):46–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ieong S, McGrew R, Nudelman E, Shoham Y, Sun Q. Fast and compact: A simple class of congestion games. Proc. 20th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence and the 17th Innovative Appl. Artificial Intelligence Conf. (2005) 489–494Google Scholar
  • Libman L, Orda A. Atomic resource sharing in noncooperative networks. Telecommun. Syst. (2001) 17(4):385–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milchtaich I. Congestion games with player-specific payoff functions. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 13(1):111–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milchtaich I. Topological conditions for uniqueness of equilibrium in networks. Math. Oper. Res. (2005) 30(1):225–244LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milchtaich I, Mavronicolas M, Kontogiannis S. The equilibrium existence problem in finite network congestion games. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom., LNCS (2006) 4286:87–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monderer D, Shapley L. Potential games. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 14(1):124–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orda A, Rom R, Shimkin N. Competitive routing in multi-user communication networks. IEEE Trans. Networking (1993) 1:510–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Panagopoulou P, Spirakis P. Algorithms for pure Nash equilibria in weighted congestion games. ACM J. Exp. Algorithmics (2006) 11(2.7):1–19Google Scholar
  • Richman O, Shimkin N. Topological uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium for selfish routing with atomic users. Math. Oper. Res. (2007) 32(1):215–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R. A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Internat. J. Game Theory (1973) 2(1):65–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R. The network equilibrium problem in integers. Networks (1973) 3(1):53–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T, Mitzenmacher M. Intrinsic robustness of the price of anarchy. Proc. 41st Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2009) 513–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T, Tardos É. How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM (2002) 49(2):236–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rozenfeld O, Tennenholtz M, Spirakis P, Mavronicolas M, Kontogiannis S. Strong and correlated strong equilibria in monotone congestion games. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom., LNCS (2006) 4286:74–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Zhang X. Existence of anonymous link tolls for system optimum on networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological (2008) 42(2):99–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.