Lipschitz Games

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1120.0557

References

  • Al-Najjar NI, Smorodinsky R. Pivotal players and the characterization of influence. J. Econom. Theory (2000) 92(2):318–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alon N, Spencer JH. The Probabilistic Method (2008) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and OptimizationWith an appendix on the life and work of Paul ErdősCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmona G. On the purification of Nash equilibria of large games. Econom. Lett. (2004) 85(2):215–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmona G. Purification of Bayesian-Nash equilibria in large games with compact type and action spaces. J. Math. Econom. (2008) 44(12):1302–1311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmona G, Podczeck K. On the existence of pure-strategy equilibria in large games. J. Econom. Theory (2009) 144(3):1300–1319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmona G, Podczeck K. Ex-post stability of Bayes–Nash equilibria of large games. Games Econom. Behav. (2012) 74(1):418–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cartwright E, Wooders M. On equilibrium in pure strategies in games with many players. Internat. J. Game Theory (2009) 38(1):137–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daskalakis C, Papadimitriou C. Computing equilibria in anonymous games. 48th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2007) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 83–93Google Scholar
  • Deb J, Kalai E. Stability in large Bayesian games with heterogeneous players. (2010) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Gradwohl R, Reingold O. Partial exposure in large games. Games Econom. Behav. (2010) 68(2):602–613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson MO. Social and Economic Networks (2008) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalai E. Large robust games. Econometrica (2004) 72(6):1631–1665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ledoux M. The Concentration of Measure Phenomenon, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs (2001) 89(American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI) Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica (1990) 58(6):1255–1277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monderer D, Shapley LS. Potential games. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 14(1):124–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rashid S. Equilibrium points of nonatomic games: Asymptotic results. Econom. Lett. (1983) 12(1):7–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal RW. A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Internat. J. Game Theory (1973) 2(1):65–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein A. Comments on the interpretation of game theory. Econometrica (1991) 59(4):909–924CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmeidler D. Equilibrium points of nonatomic games. J. Statist. Phys. (1973) 7(4):295–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The Leisure of the Theory Class Brouwer, Tarski and the existence of Nash equilibrium. (2010) . October 5, http://theoryclass.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/brouwer-tarski-and-the-existence-of-nash-equilibrium/Google Scholar
  • Zhou L. A simple proof of the Shapley-Folkman theorem. Econom. Theory (1993) 3(2):371–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.