Euclidean Networks with a Backbone and a Limit Theorem for Minimum Spanning Caterpillars

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2014.0706

References

  • Arora S (1998) Polynomial time approximation schemes for Euclidean traveling salesman and other geometric problems. J. ACM 45(5):753–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Assmann SF, Peck GW, Sysło MM, Zak J (1981) The bandwidth of caterpillars with hairs of length 1 and 2. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 2(4):387–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avram F, Bertsimas D (1992) The minimum spanning tree constant in geometrical probability and under the independent model: A unified approach. Ann. Appl. Probab. 2(1):113–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beardwood J, Halton JH, Hammersley JM (1959) The shortest path through many points. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 55:299–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boucheron S, Lugosi G, Bousquet O (2004) Concentration inequalities. Bousquet O, von Luxburg U, Rätsch G, eds. Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, Vol. 3176, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. (Springer, Berlin), 208–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cortina-Borja M, Robinson T (2000) Estimating the asymptotic constants of the total length of Euclidean minimal spanning trees with power-weighted edges. Statist. Probab. Lett. 47(2):125–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El-Basil S (1987) Applications of caterpillar trees in chemistry and physics. J. Math. Chemistry 1:153–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El-Basil S (1990) Caterpillar (Gutman) trees in chemical graph theory. Gutman I, Cyvin S, eds. Advances in the Theory of Benzenoid Hydrocarbons, Vol. 153, Topics in Current Chemistry (Springer, Berlin), 273–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El-Basil S (2008) Combinatorial properties of graphs and groups of physico-chemical interest. Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening 11(9):707–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feige U, Talwar K (2005) Approximating the bandwidth of caterpillars. Approximation, Randomization and Combinatorial Optimization, Vol. 3624, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. (Springer, Berlin), 62–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Few L (1955) The shortest path and the shortest road through n points in a region. Mathematika 2:141–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finch SR (2003) Mathematical Constants. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 94 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutman I (1977) Topological properties of benzenoid systems. Theoret Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Comput., Modeling (Theoretica Chimica Acta) 45:309–315.Google Scholar
  • Haralambides J, Makedon F, Monien B (1991) Bandwidth minimization: An approximation algorithm for caterpillars. Math. Systems Theory 24(3):169–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harary F, Schwenk A (1971) Trees with Hamiltonian square. Mathematika 18:138–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harary F, Schwenk A (1972) A new crossing number for bipartite graphs. Utilitas Math. 1:203–209.Google Scholar
  • Harary F, Schwenk AJ (1973) The number of caterpillars. Discrete Math. 6:359–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson DS, McGeoch LA, Rothberg EE (1996) Asymptotic experimental analysis for the Held-Karp traveling salesman bound. Tardos E, ed. Proc. Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms, Atlanta, GA (ACM, New York), 341–350.Google Scholar
  • Kesten H, Lee S (1996) The central limit theorem for weighted minimal spanning trees on random points. Ann. Appl. Probab. 6(2):495–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korevaar J (2004) Tauberian theory. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], Vol. 329 (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin M, Lin Z, Xu J (2006) Graph bandwidth of weighted caterpillars. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 363(3):266–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindvall T (1992) Lectures on the Coupling Method (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY).Google Scholar
  • Miller Z (1981) The bandwidth of caterpillar graphs. Hoffman F, Reid KB, Mullin RC, Stanton RG, eds., Proc. Twelfth Southeastern Conf. Combinatorics, Graph Theory Comput., Vol. 2, Baton Rouge, LA, Vol. 33 (Utilitas Mathematica Publications, Winnipeg, Canada), 235–252.Google Scholar
  • Monien B (1986) The bandwidth minimization problem for caterpillars with hair length 3 is NP-complete. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 7(4):505–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moscato P, Norman MG (1998) On the performance of heuristics on finite and infinite fractal instances of the Euclidean traveling salesman problem. INFORMS J. Comput. 10(2):121–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ortiz C, Villanueva M (2012) Maximal independent sets in caterpillar graphs. Discrete Appl. Math. 160(3):259–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhee WT (1993) A matching problem and subadditive Euclidean functionals. Ann. Appl. Probab. 3(3):794–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele JM (1981) Subadditive Euclidean functionals and nonlinear growth in geometric probability. Ann. Probab. 9(3):365–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele JM (1986) An Efron-Stein inequality for nonsymmetric statistics. Ann. Statist. 14(2):753–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele JM (1988) Growth rates of Euclidean minimal spanning trees with power weighted edges. Ann. Probab. 16(4):1767–1787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele JM (1997) Probability Theory and Combinatorial Optimization, Vol. 69, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tao T (2008) Structure and Randomness (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Google Scholar
  • Yukich JE (1998) Probability Theory of Classical Euclidean Optimization Problems, Vol. 1675, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.