A Measure-Valued Differentiation Approach to Sensitivities of Quantiles

References

• Asmussen S, Glynn P (2007) Stochastic Simulation (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Bahadur R (1966) A note on quantiles in large samples. Ann. Math. Statist. 37:577–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodie Z, Kane A, Marcus AJ (2011) Investments and Portfolio Management, 9th ed. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
• Burke P (1956) The output of a queueing system. Oper. Res. 4(6):699–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao XR (2007) Stochastic Learning and Optimization: A Sensitivity-Based Approach (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• David HA, Nagaraja HN (2003) Order Statistics, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value at risk. J. Derivatives 4:7–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC (2006) Gradient estimation. Henderson S, Nelson B, eds. Handbook on Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation, Vol. 13 (North Holland, New York), 575–616.Google Scholar
• Fu MC, Hu JQ (1997) Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC, Hu JQ, Hong L (2009) Conditional Monte Carlo estimation of quantile sensitivities. Management Sci. 55(12):2019–2027.Link, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P (1991) Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis (Kluwer Academic, Boston).Google Scholar
• Glasserman P (1993) Regenerative derivatives for regenerative sequences. Adv. Appl. Probab. 25:116–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidergott B (2001) A differential calculus for random matrices with applications to (max, +)-linear stochastic systems. Math. Oper. Res. 26(4):679–699.Link, Google Scholar
• Heidergott B, Fahrenhorst-Yuan T (2010) Gradient estimation for a multi-component maintenance system using measure-valued differentiation. Oper. Res. 58(3):706–718.Link, Google Scholar
• Heidergott B, Leahu H (2010) Weak differentiability of product measures. Math. Oper. Res. 35(1):27–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Heidergott B, Volk-Makarewicz W (2013) A measure-valued differentiation approach to sensitivity analysis of quantiles. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2013-082/III.Google Scholar
• Heidergott B, Vázquez-Abad F, Volk-Makarewicz W (2008) Sensitivity estimation for Gaussian systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187:193–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidergott B, Vázquez-Abad F, Pflug G, Farenhorst-Yuan T (2010) Gradient estimation for discrete-event systems by measure-valued differentiation. Trans. Modelling Comput. Simulation 20(5):28.Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Cao XR (1991) Perturbation Analysis of Discrete Event Dynamic Systems (Kluwer Academic, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L (2009) Estimating quantile sensitivities. Oper. Res. 57(1):118–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Liu G (2009) Simulating sensitivities of conditional value at risk. Management Sci. 55(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Liu G (2010) Pathwise estimation of probability sensitivities through terminating or terminating or steady-state simulations. Oper. Res. 58(2):357–370.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Liu G (2011) Kernel estimation of the Greeks for options with discounted payoffs. Oper. Res. 59(1):96–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarrow RA, Madan DP (1991) A characterization of complete security markets on a Brownian filtration. Math. Finance 1:31–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallenberg O (2001) Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Kroese D, Taimre T, Botev Z (2011) Handbook of Monte Carlo Methods (Wiley Series in Probability, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu G, Hong L (2009) Kernel estimation of quantile sensitivities. Naval Res. Logist. 56:511–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu G, Hong L (2011) Kernel estimation of the Greeks for options with discounted payoffs. Oper. Res. 59(1):96–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyuu YD, Teng HW (2011) Unbiased and efficient Greeks of rainbow options. Finance and Stochastics 15:141–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41:867–887.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrov V (1995) Limit Theorems of Probability Theory: Sequences of Independent Random Variables (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Pflug G (1996) Optimization of Stochastic Models (Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pyke R (1965) Spacings. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 27:395–449.Google Scholar
• Reich E (1963) Note on queues in tandem. Ann. Math. Statist. 34:338–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein R, Shapiro A (1993) Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization by the Score Function Method (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, NY).Google Scholar
• Sen P (1968) Asymptotic normality of sample quantiles for m-dependent processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 39:1724–1730.Google Scholar
• Sen P (1972) On the Bahadur representation of sample quantiles for sequences of φ-mixing random variables. J. Multivariate Anal. 2:77–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serfling R (1980) Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF (1963) A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Management Sci. 9(2):277–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Shiryaev A (1989) Probability, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Suri R, Zazanis M (1988) Perturbation analysis gives strong consistent estimates for the M/G/1 queue. Management Sci. 34(1):39–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Volk-Makarewicz W, Heidergott B (2015) Sensitivity analysis of ranked data: From order statistics to quantiles. Discrete Event Dynam. Systems Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Wu B (2005) On the Bahadur representation of sample quantiles for dependent sequences. Ann. Statist. 33:1934–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu J (1986) Consistency of a k-nearest neighbor probability density function estimator. Acta Mathematica Scientia 6:467–477.Google Scholar
• Yu J (1997) Uniform convergence rates for a nearest neighbor density estimator under dependence assumptions. Comm. Statist.—Theory and Methods 26:601–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu J (2005) Consistency of a nearest neighbor density estimator for dependent variables. J. Nonparametric Statist. 17(8):873–884.Crossref, Google Scholar