Convergence Rate Analysis for the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers with a Substitution Procedure for Separable Convex Programming

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2016.0822

References

  • Blum E, Oettli W (1975) Mathematische Optimierung, Econometrics and Operations Research, 20 (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2010) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends Machine Learn. 3(1):1–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan RH, Yang JF, Yuan XM (2011) Alternating direction method for image inpainting sin wavelet domain. SIAM J. Image Sci. 4(3):807–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TF, Glowinski R (1978) Finite element approximation and iterative solution of a class of mildly non-linear elliptic equations. Stanford report STAN-CS-78-674, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  • Chen CH, He BS, Yuan XM (2012) Matrix completion via alternating direction method. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32(1):227–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen CH, He BS, Ye YY, Yuan XM (2016) The direct extension of ADMM for multi-block convex minimization problems is not necessarily convergent. Math. Program 155(1):57–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52(4):1289–1306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckstein J, Bertsekas DP (1992) On the Douglas-Rachford splitting method and the proximal point algorithm for maximal monotone operators. Math. Program. 55(1):293–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esser E (2009) Applications of Lagrangian-based alternating direction methods and connections to split Bregman. UCLA CAM Report, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems, Springer Series in Operations Research, Vol. I (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Fortin M, Glowinski R (1983) Augmented Lagrangian methods: Applications to the numerical solutions of boundary value problems. Stud. Math. Appl. Vol. 15 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Fukushima M (1992) Application of the alternating direction method of multipliers to separable convex programming problems. Comput. Optim. Appli. 1(1):93–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabay D, Mercier B (1976) A dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite-element approximations. Comput. Math. Appli. 2(1):17–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glowinski R (1984) Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Variational Problems (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glowinski R, Le Tallec P (1989) Augmented Lagrangian and Operator-Splitting Methods in Nonlinear Mechanics. Studies in Applied Mathematics (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glowinski R, Marrocco A (1975) Sur l’approximation par éléments finis d’ordre un et résolution par pénalisation-dualité d’une classe de problèmes de Dirichlet non linéaires. Rev. Fr. Autom. Inf. Rech. Oper. Anal. Numér R2:41–76.Google Scholar
  • Han DR, Yuan XM (2012) A note on the alternating direction method of multipliers. J. Optim. Theory Appli. 155(1):227–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen PC, Nagy JG, O’Leary DP (2006) Deblurring Images: Matrices, Spectra, and Filtering (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He BS, Tao M, Yuan XM (2012) Alternating direction method with Gaussian back substitution for separable convex programming. SIAM J. Optim. 22(2):313–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He BS, Tao M, Yuan XM (2015) A splitting method for separable convex programming. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 35(1):394–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He BS, Xu MH, Yuan XM (2011) Solving large-scale least squares covariance matrix problems by alternating direction methods. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appli. 32(1):136–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He BS, Liao LZ, Han DR, Yang H (2002) A new inexact alternating directions method for monontone variational inequalities. Math. Program. 92(1):103–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hestenes MR (1969) Multiplier and gradient methods. J. Optim. Theory Appli. 4(5):303–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong MY, Luo ZQ (2016) On the linear convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers. Math. Programm. ePub ahead of print July 6, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-016-1034-2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang YM, Ng MK, Wen YW (2009) Fast image restoration methods for impulse and Gaussian noise removal. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 16(6):457–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang H, Haddad A (1995) Adaptive median filters: New algorithms and results. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 4(4):499–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kontogiorgis S, Meyer RR (1998) A variable-penalty alternating directions method for convex optimization. Math. Program. 83(1):29–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lan G, Monteiro RDC (2016) Iteration-complexity of first-order augmented Lagrangian methods for convex programming. Math. Program. 155(1):511–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martinet B (1970) Regularision d’inéquations variationnelles par approximations successive. Revue Francaise d’Automatique et Informatique Recherche Opérationnelle 126:154–159.Google Scholar
  • Necoara I, Suykens J (2008) Application of a smoothing technique to decomposition in convex optimization. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 53(11):2674–2679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nedelcu V, Necorara I, Tran-Ding Q (2014) Computational complexity of inexact gradient augmented Lagrangian methods: Application to constrained MPC. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52(5):3109–3134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng MK, Wang F, Yuan XM (2011) Inexact alternating direction methods for image recovery. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33(4):1643–1668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng MK, Weiss PA, Yuan XM (2010) Solving constrained total-variation problems via alternating direction methods. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32(5):2710–2736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng MK, Yuan XM, Zhang WX (2013) On variational image decomposition model for blurred images with missing pixel values. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 22(6):2233–2246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng YG, Ganesh A, Wright J, Xu WL, Ma Y (2012) Robust alignment by sparse and low-rank decomposition for linearly correlated images. IEEE Tran. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 34(11):2233–2246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell MJD (1969) A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems. Fletcher R, ed. Optimization (Academic Press, New York), 283–298.Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT (1976) Augmented Lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. 1(2):97–116.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E (1992) Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D. 60(1-4):259–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruszczyński A (1993) Parallel decomposition of multistage stochastic programming problems. Math. Program. 58(1):201–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun J, Zhang S (2010) A modified alternating direction method for convex quadratically constrained quadratic semidefinite programs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(3):1210–1220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tao M, Yuan XM (2011) Recovering low-rank and sparse components of matrices from incomplete and noisy observations. SIAM J. Optim. 21(1):57–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tibshirani R, Saunders M, Rosset S, Zhu J, Knight K (2005) Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. J. Royal Statist. Soc. 67(1):91–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tran-Dinh Q, Necoara I, Diehl M (2014) Path-following gradient-based decomposition algorithms for separable convex optimization. J. Global Optim. 59(1):59–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tran-Dinh Q, Necoara I, Savorgnans C, Diehl M (2013) An inexact perturbed path-following method for Lagrangian decomposition in large-scale separable convex optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 23(1):95–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tseng P (1991) Applications of a splitting algorithm to decomposition in convex programming and variational inequalities. SIAM J. Con. Optim. 29(1):119–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang S, Ang J, Sun J (2013) An alternating direction method for solving convex nonlinear semidefinite programming problems. Optim. 62(4):527–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XQ, Burger M, Osher S (2010) A unified primal-dual algorithm framework based on Bregman iteration. J. Sci. Comput. 46(1):20–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou Z, Li X, Wright J, Candes EJ, Ma Y (2010) Stable principal component pursuit. Proc. IEEE Intern. Sympos. Inform. Theory, ISIT ’10 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 1518–1522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.