Scheduling Using Interactive Optimization Oracles for Constrained Queueing Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2016.0824

References

  • Anderson TE, Owicki SS, Saxe JB, Thacker CP (1993) High speed switch scheduling for local area networks. ACM Trans. Comput. Systems 11(4):319–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atalla S, Cuda D, Giaccone P, Pretti M (2010) Belief-propagation assisted scheduling in input-queued switches. Petrini F, Abts D, Brightwell R, Balaji P, Minkenberg C, eds. Proc. IEEE 18th Annual Sympos. High Performance Interconnects, HOTI 2010 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 7–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayati M, Shah D, Sharma M (2008) Max-product for maximum weight matching: Convergence, correctness, and LP duality. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 54(3):1241–1251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai JG, Prabhakar B (2000) The throughput of data switches with and without speedup. Proc. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conf. IEEE Comput. Comm. Socieites, INFOCOM 2000 (IEEE. Piscataway, NJ), 556–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimakis A, Walrand J (2006) Sufficient conditions for stability of longest-queue-first scheduling: Second-order properties using fluid limits. Adv. Appl. Probab. 38(2):505–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmonds J (1965) Maximum matching and a polyhedron with 0, 1 vertices. J. Res. National Bureau of Standards 69 B:125–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmonds J (1965) Paths, trees, and flowers. Canadian J. Math. 17:449–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss S, Konstantopoulos T (2004) An overview of some stochastic stability methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 47(4):275–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giaccone P, Prabhakar B, Shah D (2003) Randomized scheduling algorithms for high-aggregate bandwidth switches. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm. 21(4):546–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg LA, MacKenzie PD (1996) Analysis of practical backoff protocols for contention resolution with multiple servers. Tardos E, ed. Proc. Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 554–563.Google Scholar
  • Gupta P, Stolyar AL (2006) Optimal throughput allocation in general random-access networks. Proc. 40th Annual Conf. Inform. Sci. Systems, CISS (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1254–1259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joo C, Lin X, Shroff NB (2009) Understanding the capacity region of the greedy maximal scheduling algorithm in multihop wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 17(4):1132–1145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan MI (2004) Graphical models. Statist. Sci. 19(1):140–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolmogorov V (2009) Blossom V: A new implementation of a minimum cost perfect matching algorithm. Math. Programming Comput. 1(1):43–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar S, Giaccone P, Leonardi E (2002) Rate stability of stable-marriage scheduling algorithms in input-queued switches. Titolo volume non avvalorato.Google Scholar
  • Leconte M, Ni J, Srikant R (2009) Improved bounds on the throughput efficiency of greedy maximal scheduling in wireless networks. Proc. 10th ACM Interat. Sympos. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Comput., MobiHoc ’09 (ACM, New York), 165–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallows CL, Richter D (1969) Inequalities of Chebyshev type involving conditional expectations. Ann. Math. Statist. 40(6):1922–1932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marbach P, Eryilmaz A, Ozdaglar A (2007) Achievable rate region of CSMA schedulers in wireless networks with primary interference constraints. Proc. 46th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1156–1161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKeown N (1999) The iSLIP scheduling algorithm for input-queued switches. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 7(2):188–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Modiano E, Shah D, Zussman G (2006) Maximizing throughput in wireless networks via gossiping. Marie RA, Key PB, Smirni E, eds. Proc. Joint Internat. Conf. Measurement and Modeling Comput. Systems, SIGMETRICS/Performance ’06 (ACM, New York), 27–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajagopalan S, Shah D, Shin J (2009) Network adiabatic theorem: An efficient randomized protocol for contention resolution. Douceur JR, Greenberg AG, Bonald T, Nieh J, eds. Proc. Eleventh Internat. Joint Conf. Measurement and Modeling Comput. Systems, SIGMETRICS/Performance ’09 (ACM, New York), 133–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanghavi S, Bui L, Srikant R (2007) Distributed link scheduling with constant overhead. Golubchik L, Ammar MH, Harchol-Balter M, eds. Proc. 2007 ACM SIGMETRICS Internat. Conf. Measurement and Modeling Comput. Systems, SIGMETRICS ’07 (ACM, New York), 313–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanghavi S, Malioutov DM, Willsky AS (2007) Linear programming analysis of loopy belief propagation for weighted matching. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 20, Proc. Twenty-First Annual Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 2007, 1273–1280.Google Scholar
  • Shah D, Shin J (2012) Randomized scheduling algorithm for queueing networks. Ann. Appl. Probab. 22(1):128–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tassiulas L (1998) Linear complexity algorithms for maximum throughput in radio networks and input queued switches. Proc. Sixteenth Annual Joint Conf. IEEE Comput. Comm. Socieites, INFOCOM ’98 (IEEE. Piscataway, NJ), 533–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tassiulas L, Ephremides A (1992) Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 37(12):1936–1949.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.