The Evolutionary Game of Pressure (or Interference), Resistance and Collaboration

References

• Aidt TS (2009) Economic analysis of corruption: A survey. Econom. J. 113(491):F632–F652.Google Scholar
• Alpern S, Lidbetter T (2013) Mining coal or finding terrorists: The expanding search paradigm. Oper. Res. 61(2):265–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Alpern S, Lidbetter T (2014) Searching a variable speed network. Math. Oper. Res. 39(3):697–711.Link, Google Scholar
• Alpern S, Morton A, Papadaki K (2011) Patrolling games. Oper. Res. 59(5):1246–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Andreozzi L (2010) Inspection games with long-run inspectors. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 21(4–5):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arce D, Sandler T (2005) Counterterrorism: A game-theoretic analysis. J. Conflict Resolution 49(2):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avenhaus G, Kilgour D (2004) Efficient distributions of arm-control inspection effort. Naval Res. Logist. 51(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avenhaus R, Canty MJ (2005) Playing for time: A sequential inspection game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 167(2):475–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avenhaus R, Von Stengel B, Zamir S (2002) Inspection games. Aumann R, Hart S, eds. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 3 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1947–1987.Google Scholar
• Ball JM, Carr J (1990) The discrete coagulation-fragmentation equations: Existence, uniqueness, and density conservation. J. Stat. Phys. 61(1/2):1990.Google Scholar
• Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5349):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Stigler GJ (1974) Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforces. J. Legal Stud. 3(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benaim M, Weibull J (2003) Deterministic approximation of stochastic evolution in games. Econometrica 71(3):873–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benaim M, Le Boudec J-Y (2008) A class of mean field interaction models for computer and communication systems. Performance Evaluation 65(11–12):823–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensoussan A, Frehse J, Yam P (2013) Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensoussan A, Frehse J, Yam P (2015) The Master equation in mean field theory. J. de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 103(6):1441–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensoussan A, Hoe S, Kantarcioglu M (2010) A game-theoretical approach for finding optimal strategies in a botnet defense model. Alpcan T, Buttyán L, Baras J, eds. Decision and Game Theory for Security. Lectures Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6442, 135–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianconi G, Barabasi A-L (2001) Bose-Einstein condensation in complex network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(24):5632–5635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binmore K, Samuelson L (1997) Muddling through: Noisy equilibrium selection. J. Econom. Theory 74(2):235–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binmore K, Samuelson L, Vaughan R (1995) Musical chairs: Modeling noisy evolution. Games Econom. Behav. 11(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S (2004) Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions and Evolution (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Boylan R (1995) Continuous approximation of dynamical systems with randomly matched individuals. J. Econom. Theory 66(2):615–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brams SJ, Kilgour DM (1988) National security games. Synthese 76(2):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmona R, Delarue F (2014) The master equation for large population equilibriums. Crisan D, Hambly B, Zariphopoulou T, eds. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics &. Stattistics, Vol. 100 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 77–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Young M, Gleditsch KS (2007) On the frequency of severe terrorist events. J. Conflict Resolution 51(1):58–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corradi V, Sarin R (2000) Continuous approximations of stochastic evolutionary game dynamics. J. Econom. Theory 94(2):163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Mesquita BB (2010) The Predictioneer’s Game (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Dereich S, Mörters P (2013) Random networks with sublinear preferential attachent: The giant component. Ann. Probab. 41(1):329–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorfman R, Samuelson P, Solow R (1958) Linear Programming and Economic Analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Ellison G (1993) Learning, local interaction, and coordination. Econometrica 61(5):1047–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faria JR, Arce D (2012) A vintage model of terrorist organizations. J. Conflict Resolution 56(4):629–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fielding H (1947) The History of The Life of The Late Mr. Jonathan Wilde the Great (Hamish Hamilton, London).Google Scholar
• Fleming WH, Soner HM (2006) Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Foster D, Young P (1990) Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics. Theoret. Population Biol. 38(2):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gast N, Gaujal B, Le Boudec J-Y (2012) Mean field for Markov decision processes: From discrete to continuous optimization. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 57(9):2266–2280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittins JC (1989) Multi-Armed Bandit and Allocation Indices (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Gorban A, Kolokoltsov V (2015) Generalized mass action law and thermodynamics for generalized nonlinear markov processes. Math. Modeling of Natural Phenomena 10(5):16–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorban A, Shahzad M (2011) The Michaellis-Menten-Stueckelberg theorem. Entropy 13(5):966–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J, Selten R (1988) A General Thery of Equilibrium Selection in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Lerma O, Lasserre JB (1996) Discrete-Time Markov Control Processes (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang M (2010) Large-population LQG games involving a major player: The Nash certainty equivalence principle. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(5):3318–3353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang M, Malhamé R, Caines P (2006) Large population stochastic dynamic games: Closed-loop Mckean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. Comm. Inform. Systems 6(3):221–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain AK (2001) Corruption: A review. J. Econom. Surveys 15(1):71–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karoui NE, Karatzas I (1994) Dynamic allocation problems in continuous time. Ann. Appl. Probab. 4(2):255–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandori M, Mailath GJ, Rob R (1993) Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games. Econometrica 61(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V (2004) Hydrodynamic limit of coagulation-fragmentation type models of k-nary interacting particles. J. Statist. Phys. 115(5):1621–1653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V (2004) Measure-valued limits of interacting particle systems with k-nary interaction II. Finite-dimensional limits. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 76(1):45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V (2006) Kinetic equations for the pure jump models of k-nary interacting particle systems. Markov Processes Related Fields 12(1):95–138.Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V (2010) Nonlinear Markov processes and kinetic equations. Cambridge Tracks in Mathematics, Vol. 182 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V (2012) Nonlinear Markov games on a finite state space (mean-field and binary interactions). Internat. J. Statist. Probab. 1(1):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Bensoussan A (2016) Mean-field-game model for botnet defense in cyber-security. Applied Math. Optimization 74(3):669–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Malafeyev OA (2010) Understanding Game Theory (World Scientific, Singapore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Malafeyev OA (2017) Mean field game model of corruption. Dynamic Games Appl. 7(1):34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Malafeyev OA (2016) Corruption and botnet defense: A mean field game approach. Preprint arxiv:1607.07350.Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Maslov VP (1987) Idempotent Analysis an Its Applications (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Yang W (2012) The turnpike theorems for Markov games. Dynamic Games Appl. 2(3):294–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Yang W (2016) Inspection games in a mean field setting. Preprint arxiv:1507.08339.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kolokoltsov V, Passi H, Yang W (2013) Inspection and crime prevention: An evolutionary perspective. Preprint arxiv:1306.4219.Google Scholar
• Krapivsky PL, Redner S (2001) Organization of growing random networks. Phys. Rev. E 63(6):066123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreindler GE, Young HP (2013) Fast convergence in evolutionary equilibrium selection. Games Econom. Behav. 80:39–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert-Mogiliansky A, Majumdar M, Radner R (2009) Strategic analysis of petty corruption with an intermediary. Rev. Econom. Des. 13(1–2):45–57.Google Scholar
• Lasry J-M, Lions P-L (2006) Jeux à champ moyen, I. Le cas stationnaire. C.R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343(9):619–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Boudec JY (2013) The stationary behaviour of fluid limits of reversible processes is concentrated on stationary points. Netw. Heterog. Media 8(2):529–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liao Q, Striegel A (2009) Botnet economics: Uncertainty matters. Managing Information Risk and the Economics of Security (Springer, New York), 245–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• López-Pintado D (2006) Contagion and coordination in random networks. Internat. J. Game Theory 34(3):371–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lye K-W, Wing JM (2005) Game strategies in network security. Int. J. Inf. Secur. 4(1):71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malafeyev OA, Redinskikh ND, Alferov GV (2014) Electric circuits analogies in economics modeling: Corruption networks. Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. Emission Electronics, ICEE-2014 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobilia M, Georgiev IT, Täuber UC, Uwe C (2007) Phase transitions and spatio-temporal fluctuations in stochastic lattice Lotka-Volterra models. J. Stat. Phys. 128(1–2):447–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norris J (2000) Cluster coagulation. Comm. Math. Phys. 209(2):407–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nourian M, Caines PE (2013) ɛ-nash mean field game theory for nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems with major and minor agents. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51(4):3302–3331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pushkin DO, Aref H (2004) Bank mergers as scale-free coagulation. Physica A 336(3–4):571–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson LF (1948) Variation of the frequency of fatal quarrels with magnitude. J. Amer. Stat. Ass. 43(244):523–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosendorff BP, Sandler T (2005) Too much of a good thing?: The proactive response dilemma. J. Conflict Resolution 48(5):657–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saichev A, Malvergne Y, Sornette D (2010) Theory of Zipf’s Law and Beyond, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematicl Systems, Vol. 632 (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salten F (1928) Bambi, a Life in The Woods (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Sandholm W (2001) Almost global convergence to p-dominant equilibrium. Internat. J. Game Theory 30(1):107–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandholm W (2012) Stochastic imitative game dynamics with committed agents. J. Econom. Theory 147(5):2056–2071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandler T, Arce D (2003) Terrorism and game theory. Simulation and Gaming 34(3):319–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandler T, Lapan HE (1988) The calculus of dissent: An analysis of terrorists’ choice of targets. Synthese 76(2):245–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stowe HB (1963) Uncle Tom’s Cabin (Blackie & Sons, London).Google Scholar
• Simkin MV, Roychowdhury VP (2011) Re-inventing Willis. Phys. Rep. 502(1):1–35.Google Scholar
• Wang B-C, Zhang J-F (2013) Distributed output feedback control of Markov jump multi-agent systems. Automatica J. IFAC 49(5):1397–1402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaari G, Nowak A, Rakocy K, Solomon S (2008) Microscopic study reveals the singular origins of growth. Eur. Phys. J. B 62(4):505–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young HP (1993) The evolution of conventions. Econometrica 61(1):57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaslavski AJ (2006) Turnpike Properties in The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control (Springer, New York).Google Scholar