Partially Observable Risk-Sensitive Markov Decision Processes

References

• Bäuerle N, Jaśkiewicz A (2015) Risk-sensitive dividend problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242(1):161–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bäuerle N, Rieder U (2011) Markov Decision Processes with Applications to Finance (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bäuerle N, Rieder U (2014) More risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Math. Oper. Res. 39(1):105–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Bäuerle N, Rieder U (2015) Partially observable risk-sensitive stopping problems. Piunovskly AB, ed. Modern Trends in Controlled Stochastic Processes II (Luniver Press, Frome, UK), 12–31.Google Scholar
• Bielecki T, Pliska SR (2003) Economic properties of the risk sensitive criterion for portfolio management. Rev. Account. Fin. 2(2):3–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavazos-Cadena R, Hernández-Hernández D (2005) Successive approximations in partially observable controlled Markov chains with risk-sensitive average criterion. Stochastics 77(6):537–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavazos-Cadena R, Hernández-Hernández D (2016) A characterization of the optimal certainty equivalent of the average cost via the Arrow-Pratt sensitivity function. Math. Oper. Res. 41(1):224–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis MHA, Lleo S (2014) Risk-Sensitive Investment Management (World Scientific, Singapore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Masi GB, Stettner L (1999) Risk-sensitive control of discrete-time Markov processes with infinite horizon. SIAM J. Control Optim. 38(1):61–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg E, Kasyanov P, Zgurovsky M (2014) Partially observable total-cost Markov decision processes with weakly continuous transition probabilities. Math. Oper. Res. 41(2):656–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Feinberg E, Kasyanov P, Zgurovsky M (2016) Convergence of probability measures and Markov decision models with incomplete information. Proc. Steklov Institute Math. 287(1):96–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu JY, Wan AH (2002) Generalized vector equilibrium problems with set-valued mappings. Math. Meth. Oper. Res. 56(2):259–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haskell WB, Jain R (2015) A convex analytic approach to risk-aware Markov decision processes. SIAM J. Control Optim. 53(3):1569–1598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernández-Hernández D (1999) Partially observed control problems with multiplicative cost. Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications (Birkhäuser, Boston), 41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernández-Lerma O (1989) Adaptive Markov Control Processes (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinderer K (1970) Foundations of Non-Stationary Dynamic Programming with Discrete Time Parameter (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard RA, Matheson JE (1972) Risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Management Sci. 18(7):356–369.Link, Google Scholar
• James MR, Baras JS, Elliott RJ (1994) Risk-sensitive control and dynamic games for partially observed discrete-time nonlinear systems. IEEE T. Automat. Contr. 39(4):780–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller A (2000) Expected utility maximization of optimal stopping problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122(1):101–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhenius D (1974) Incomplete information in Markovian decision models. Ann. Stat. 2(6):1327–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stettner L (2004) Risk sensitive portfolio optmization with completely and partially observed factors. IEEE T. Automat. Contr. 49(3):457–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittle P (1981) Risk-sensitive linear quadratic Gaussian control. Adv. Appl. Probab. 13(4):764–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yushkevich AA (1976) Reduction of a controlled Markov model with incomplete data to a problem with complete information in the case of Borel state and control space. Theor. Probab. Appl. 21(1):153–158.Crossref, Google Scholar