Optimal Stopping Under Uncertainty in Drift and Jump Intensity

References

• Andersen L, Broadie M (2004) A primal-dual simulation algorithm for pricing multi-dimensional American options. Management Sci. 50(9):1222–1234.Link, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barone-Adesi G, Whaley R (1987) Efficient analytic approximation of American option values. J. Finance 42(2):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayraktar E, Yao S (2011) Optimal stopping for non-linear expectations—Part I. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 121(2):185–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayraktar E, Yao S (2014) On the robust optimal stopping problem. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52(5):3135–3175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayraktar E, Yao S (2017) On the robust Dynkin game. Ann. Appl. Probab. 27(3):1702–1755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayraktar E, Yao S (2017) Optimal stopping with random maturity under nonlinear expectations. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 127(8): 2586–2629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayraktar E, Karatzas I, Yao S (2010) Optimal stopping for dynamic convex risk measures. Illinois J. Math. 54(3):1025–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belomestny D, Krätschmer V (2016) Optimal stopping under model uncertainty: A randomized stopping times approach. Ann. Appl. Probab. 26(2):1260–1295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belomestny D, Krätschmer V (2017) Optimal stopping under probability distortions and law invariant coherent risk measures. Math. Oper. Res. 42(3):806–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Belomestny D, Bender C, Schoenmakers J (2009) True upper bounds for Bermudam products via non-nested Monte Carlo. Math. Finance 19(1):53–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bender C, Schweizer N, Zhuo J (2017) A primal-dual algorithm for BSDEs. Math. Finance 27(3):866–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneš VE (1970) Existence of optimal strategies based on specified information, for a class of stochastic decision problems. SIAM J. Control 8(2):179–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A (1985) The entropic penalty approach to stochastic programming. Math. Oper. Res. 10(2):263–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Teboulle M (1986) Expected utility, penalty functions, and duality in stochastic nonlinear programming. Management Sci. 32(11):1445–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Teboulle M (1987) Penalty functions and duality in stochastic programming via φ-divergence functionals. Math. Oper. Res. 12(2):224–240.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Teboulle M (2007) An old-new concept of convex risk measures: The optimized certainty equivalent. Math. Finance 17(3):449–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Bertsimas D, Brown DB (2010) A soft robust model for optimization under ambiguity. Oper. Res. 58(4, Part 2):1220–1234.Link, Google Scholar
• Beskos A, Roberts G (2005) Exact simulation of diffusions. Ann. Appl. Probab. 15(4):2422–2444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Björk T, Slinko I (2006) Towards a general theory of good-deal bounds. Rev. Finance 10(2):221–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouchard B, Elie R (2008) Discrete-time approximation of decoupled forward-backward SDE with jumps. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 118(1):53–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan M, Schwartz E (1985) Evaluating natural resource investments. J. Bus. 58(2):135–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadie M, Glasserman P (2004) A stochastic mesh method for pricing high-dimensional American options. J. Comput. Finance 7(4):35–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadie M, Kaya O (2006) Exact simulation of stochastic volatility and other affine jump diffusion processes. Oper. Res. 54(2):217–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Carriere J (1996) Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Insurance: Math. Econom. 19(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Montrucchio L (2011) Uncertainty averse preferences. J. Econom. Theory 146(4):1275–1330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen N, Huang Z (2013) Localization and exact simulation of Brownian motion driven stochastic differential equations. Math. Oper. Res. 38(3):591–616.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Epstein LG (2002) Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time. Econometrica 70(4):1403–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Riedel F (2013) Optimal stopping under ambiguity in continuous time. Math. Financial Econom. 7(1):29–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheridito P, Delbaen F, Kupper M (2006) Coherent and convex monetary risk measures for unbounded càdlàg processes. Finance Stochastics 10(3):427–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi S, Ruszczyński A, Zhao Y (2011) A multiproduct risk-averse newsvendor with law-invariant coherent measures of risk. Oper. Res. 59(2):346–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Clément E, Lamberton D, Protter P (2002) An analysis of a least squares regression method for American option pricing. Finance Stochastics 6(4):449–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cochrane J, Saá-Requejo J (2000) Beyond arbitrage: Good-deal asset price bounds in incomplete markets. J. Political Econom. 108(1):79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cont R, Tankov R (2004) Financial Modelling with Jump Processes (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Csiszár I (1975) I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. Ann. Probab. 3(1):146–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasci A, Laporte G (2005) A continuous model for multistore competitive location. Oper. Res. 53(2):263–280.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis M, Karatzas I (1994) A deterministic approach to optimal stopping. Kelly FP, ed. Probability, Statistics and Optimisation: A Tribute to Peter Whittle, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 455–466.Google Scholar
• Dayanik S, Karatzas I (2003) On the optimal stopping problem for one-dimensional diffusions. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 107(2):173–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delbaen F (2006) The structure of m-stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neutral measures. Émery M, Yor M, eds. In Memoriam Paul-André Meyer (Springer, Berlin), 215–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delbaen F, Peng S, Rosazza Gianin E (2010) Representation of the penalty term of dynamic concave utilities. Finance and Stochastics 14(3):449–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dharma Kwon H (2010) Invest or exit? Optimal decisions in the face of a declining profit stream. Oper. Res. 58(3):638–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Dixit A (1989) Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. J. Political Econom. 97(3):620–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit A, Pindyck RS (1996) Investment Under Uncertainty (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Epstein LG (1992) Stochastic differential utility. Econometrica 60(2):353–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekren I, Touzi N, Zhang J (2014) Optimal stopping under nonlinear expectation. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 124(10):3277–3311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Karoui N (1981) Les aspects probabilistes du contrôle stochastique. Hennequin PL, ed. Ecole d’Eté de Probabilités de Saint-Flour IX-1979 (Springer, Berlin), 73–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochastics 6(4):429–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2011) Stochastic Finance (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frittelli M, Rosazza Gianin E (2002) Putting order in risk measures. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1473–1486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giesecke K, Smelov D (2013) Exact sampling of jump-diffusions. Oper. Res. 61(4):894–907.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P (2004) Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo X, Pham H (2005) Optimal partially reversible investment with entry decision and general production function. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 115(5):705–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen L, Jagannathan R (1991) Implications of security market data for models of dynamic economies. J. Political Econom. 99(2):225–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen L, Sargent T (2001) Robust control and model uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):60–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen L, Sargent T (2007) Robustness (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haugh M, Kogan L (2004) Pricing American options: A duality approach. Oper. Res. 52(2):258–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Heath D, Ku H (2004) Pareto equilibria with coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 14(2):163–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson V, Hobson D (2013) Risk aversion, indivisible timing options and gambling. Oper. Res. 61(1):126–137.Link, Google Scholar
• Henry-Labordère P, Tan X, Touzi N (2015) Exact simulation of multi-dimensional stochastic differential equations. Working paper, Société Générale–Paris, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2598505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber P (1981) Robust Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson H (1987) Options on the maximum or the minimum of several assets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 22(3):277–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karatzas I, Shreve S (1998) Methods of Mathematical Finance, Vol. 39 (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krätschmer V, Schoenmakers J (2010) Representations for optimal stopping under dynamic monetary utility functionals. SIAM J. Financial Math. 1(1):811–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laeven RJA, Stadje M (2013) Entropy coherent and entropy convex measures of risk. Math. Oper. Res. 38(2):265–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Laeven RJA, Stadje M (2014) Robust portfolio choice and indifference valuation. Math. Oper. Res. 39(4):1109–1141.Link, Google Scholar
• Lesnevski V, Nelson B, Staum J (2007) Simulation of coherent risk measures based on generalized scenarios. Management Sci. 53(11): 1756–1769.Link, Google Scholar
• Longstaff F, Schwartz E (2001) Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(1):113–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A (2006) Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6):1447–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matoussi A, Piozin L, Possamaï D (2014) Second-order BSDEs with general reflection and game options under uncertainty. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 124(7):2281–2321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matoussi A, Possamaï D, Zhou C (2013) Second order reflected backward stochastic differential equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. 23(6):2420–2457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Siegel D (1986) The value of waiting to invest. Quart. J. Econom. 101(4):707–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nutz M, Zhang J (2015) Optimal stopping under adverse nonlinear expectation and related games. Ann. Appl. Probab. 25(5):2503–2534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Øksendal B, Sulem A (2007) Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions, 2nd ed. (Universitext Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Øksendal B, Sulem A, Zhang T (2014) Singular control and optimal stopping of SPDEs, and backward SPDEs with reflection. Math. Oper. Res. 39(2):464–486.Link, Google Scholar
• Peng S (2004) Nonlinear Expectations, Nonlinear Evaluations and Risk Measures, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1856 (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peskir G, Shiryaev AN (2006) Optimal Stopping and Free-Boundary Problems, Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Philpott A, de Matos V, Finardi E (2013) On solving multistage stochastic programs with coherent risk measures. Oper. Res. 61(4):957–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Riedel F (2004) Dynamic coherent risk measures. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 112(2):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedel F (2009) Optimal stopping with multiple priors. Econometrica 77(3):857–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers LCG (2002) Monte Carlo valuation of American options. Math. Finance 12(3):271–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruszczyński A (2010) Risk-averse dynamic programming for Markov decision processes. Math. Programming Ser. B 125(2):235–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruszczyński A, Shapiro A (2006) Optimization of convex risk functions. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3):433–452.Link, Google Scholar
• Ruszczyński A, Shapiro A (2006) Conditional risk mappings. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3):544–561.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers J, Zhang J, Huang J (2013) Optimal dual martingales, their analysis and application to new algorithms for Bermudan products. SIAM J. Financial Math. 4(1):86–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2009) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snell LJ (1952) Applications of martingale system theorems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 73(2):293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang S, Li X (1994) Necessary conditions for optimal control of stochastic systems with random jumps. SIAM J. Control Optim. 32(5): 1447–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang S, Wei W (2012) Representation of dynamic time-consistent convex risk measures with jumps. Risk Decision Anal. 3(3):167–190.Google Scholar
• Tekaya W, Shapiro AS, Soares MP, da Costa JP (2013) Worst-case-expectation approach to optimization under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 61(6):1435–1449.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsitsiklis JN, Van Roy B (2000) Regression methods for pricing complex American-style options. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 12(4):694–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A (1950) Statistical Decision Functions (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar