Nonconvex Lagrangian-Based Optimization: Monitoring Schemes and Global Convergence

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2017.0900

References

  • Attouch H, Bolte J (2009) On the convergence of the proximal algorithm for nonsmooth functions involving analytic features. Math. Programming 116(1):5–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Attouch H, Bolte J, Svaiter BF (2013) Convergence of descent methods for semi-algebraic and tame problems: Proximal algorithms, forward backward splitting, and regularized Gauss-Seidel methods. Math. Programming 137(1–2):91–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Auslender A (2015) An exact penalty method for nonconvex problems covering, in particular, nonlinear programming, semidefinite programming, and second-order cone programming. SIAM J. Optim. 25(3):1732–1759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck A, Eldar YC (2013) Sparsity constrained nonlinear optimization: Optimality conditions and algorithms. SIAM J. Optim. 23(3):1480–1509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck A, Hallak N (2016) On the minimization over sparse symmetric sets: Projections, optimality conditions, and algorithms. Math. Oper. Res. 41(1):196–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker S, Bobin J, Candès E (2011) NESTA: A fast and accurate first-order method for sparse recovery. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 4(1):1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP (1996) Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods (Athena Scientific, Belmont MA).Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP, Tsitsiklis JN (1989) Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods (Prentice-Hall, Enlewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Björck A (1996) Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolte J, Pauwels E (2016) Majorization-minimization procedures and convergence of SQP methods for semi-algebraic and tame programs. Math. Oper. Res. 41(2):442–465.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolte J, Daniilidis A, Lewis AS (2007) The Łojasiewicz inequality for nonsmooth subanalytic functions with applications to subgradient dynamical systems. SIAM J. Optim. 17(4):1205–1223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolte J, Sabach S, Teboulle M (2014) Proximal alternating linearized minimization for nonconvex and nonsmooth problems. Math. Programming 146(1–2):459–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chavent G (2009) Nonlinear Least Squares for Inverse Problems (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • Edelman A, Arias TA, Steven ST (1998) The geometry of algorithms with orthogonality constraints. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 20(2):303–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fortin M, Glowinski R (1983) Augmented Lagrangian Methods: Applications to the Numerical Solution of Boundary-Valued Problems (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Glowinski R, Le Tallec P (1989) Augmented Lagrangian and Operator-Splitting Methods in Nonlinear Mechanics (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hesse R, Luke DR (2013) Nonconvex notions of regularity and convergence of fundamental algorithms for feasibility problems. SIAM J. Optim. 23(4):2397–2419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haarhoff PC, Buys JD (1970) A new method for the optimization of a nonlinear function subject to nonlinear constraints. Computer J. 13(2):178–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hestenes M (1969) Multiplier and gradient methods. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 4(5):303–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S, Kojima M (2009) Solving polynomial least squares problems via semidefinite programming relaxations. J. Global Optim. 46(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurdyka K (1998) On gradients of functions definable in o-minimal structures. Ann. Inst. Fourier 48(3):769–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis AS, Luke DR, Malick J (2009) Local linear convergence for alternating and averaged nonconvex projections. Foundations of Comput. Math. 9(4):485–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li G, Pong TK (2015) Global convergence of splitting methods for nonconvex composite optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 25(4):2434–2460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Łojasiewicz S (1963) Une propriété topologique des sous-ensembles analytiques réels. Les Équations aux Derivées Partielles (Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris), 87–89.Google Scholar
  • Luss R, Teboulle M (2013) Conditional gradient algorithms for rank-one matrix approximations with a sparsity constraint. SIAM Rev. 55(1):65–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milnor J (1997) Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Ortega JM, Rheinboldt WC (1970) Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Powell MJD (1969) A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems. Fletcher R, ed. Optimization (Academic Press, New York), 283–298.Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT (1976) Augmented Lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. 1(2):97–116.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT, Wets RJ-B (1998) Variational Analysis. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 317 (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shefi R, Teboulle M (2014) Rate of convergence analysis of decomposition methods based on the proximal method of multipliers for convex minimization. SIAM J. Optim. 24(1):269–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sra S, Nowozin S, Wright SJ (2011) Optimization for Machine Learning (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.