A Tale of a Principal and Many, Many Agents

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2018.0931

References

  • Bayraktar E, Cosso A, Pham H (2018) Randomized dynamic programming principle and Feynman-Kac representation for optimal control of McKean-Vlasov dynamics. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370(3):2115–2160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bensoussan A, Frehse J, Yam S (2013) Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, Vol. 101 (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2005) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Buckdahn R, Li J, Peng S (2009) Mean-field backward stochastic differential equations and related partial differential equations. Stochastic Processes and Their Appl. 119(10):3133–3154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckdahn R, Djehiche B, Li J, Peng S (2009) Mean-field backward stochastic differential equations: A limit approach. Ann. Probab. 37(4):1524–1565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckdahn R, Li J, Peng S, Rainer C (2017) Mean-field stochastic differential equations and associated PDEs. Ann. Probab. 45(2):824–878.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardaliaguet P (2010) Notes on mean field games (from P.-L. Lions’ lectures at Collège de France), lecture given at Tor Vergata, April–May 2010.Google Scholar
  • Cardaliaguet P, Delarue F, Lasry JM, Lions P-L (2015) The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02505.Google Scholar
  • Carmona R, Delarue F (2013) Mean field forward–backward stochastic differential equations. Electronic Comm. Probab. 18(68):1–15.Google Scholar
  • Carmona R, Delarue F (2015) Forward–backward stochastic differential equations and controlled McKean-Vlasov dynamics. Ann. Probab. 43(5):2647–2700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmona R, Lacker D (2015) A probabilistic weak formulation of mean field games and applications. Ann. Appl. Probab. 25(3):1189–1231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmona R, Fouque JP, Sun LH (2015) Mean field games and systemic risk. Comm. Math. Sci. 13(4):911–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chassagneux JF, Crisan D, Delarue F (2014) A probabilistic approach to classical solutions of the master equation for large population equilibria. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.3009.Google Scholar
  • Chiang TS (1994) McKean-Vlasov equations with discontinuous coefficients. Soochow J. Math. 20(4):507–526.Google Scholar
  • Cvitanić J, Zhang J (2012) Contract Theory in Continuous-Time Models (Springer).Google Scholar
  • Cvitanić J, Possamaï D, Touzi N (2018) Dynamic programming approach to principal-agent problems. Finance and Stochastics 22(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cvitanić J, Possamaï D, Touzi N (2017) Moral hazard in dynamic risk management. Management Sci. 63(10):3328–3346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dellacherie C, Lenglart E (1981) Sur des problèmes de régularisation, de recollement et d’interpolation en théorie des martingales. Séminaire de probabilités de Strasbourg XV, 328–346.Google Scholar
  • Demski J, Sappington D (1984) Optimal incentive contracts with multiple agents. J. Econom. Theory 33(1):152–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Djehiche B, Helgesson P (2015) The principal-agent problem with time inconsistent utility functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.05416.Google Scholar
  • El Karoui N, Tan X (2013) Capacities, measurable selection and dynamic programming part II: Application in stochastic control problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.3364.Google Scholar
  • El Karoui N, Peng S, Quenez MC (1997) Backward stochastic differential equations in finance. Math. Finance 7(1):1–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Élie R, Possamaï D (2016) Contracting theory with competitive interacting agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08099.Google Scholar
  • Green J, Stokey N (1983) A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. 91(3):349–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harter J, Richou A (2016) A stability approach for solving multidimensional quadratic BSDEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08627.Google Scholar
  • Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. The Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang M, Caines P, Malhamé R (2007) An invariance principle in large population stochastic dynamic games. J. Systems Sci. Complexity 20(2):162–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang M, Malhamé R, Caines P (2006) Large population stochastic dynamic games: Closed-loop McKean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. Comm. Inform. Systems 6(3):221–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koo H, Shim G, Sung J (2008) Optimal multi-agent performance measures for team contracts. Math. Finance 18(4):649–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasry JM, Lions P-L (2006) Jeux à champ moyen. i—le cas stationnaire. Comptes Rendus Mathématique 343(9):619–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasry JM, Lions P-L (2006) Jeux à champ moyen. ii—horizon fini et contrôle optimal. Comptes Rendus Mathématique 343(10):679–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasry JM, Lions P-L (2007) Mean field games. Japanese J. Math. 2(1):229–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lépingle D, Mémin J (1978) Intégrabilité uniforme et dans lr des martingales exponentielles. Publications des séminaires de mathématiques et informatique de Rennes 1:1–14.Google Scholar
  • Lions P-L (1988) Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear second-order equations and optimal stochastic control in infinite dimensions. Part I: The case of bounded stochastic evolutions. Acta Mathematica 161(1):243–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lions P-L (1989) Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear second-order equations and optimal stochastic control in infinite dimensions. III. Uniqueness of viscosity solutions for general second-order equations. J. Functional Anal. 86(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lions P-L (1989) Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear second order equations and optimal stochastic control in infinite dimensions. Part II: Optimal control of Zakai’s equation. da Prato G, Tubaro L, eds. Stochastic Partial Differential Equations and Appl. II. Proc. Conf. Held in Trento, Italy February 1–6, 1988, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1390 (Springer), 147–170.Google Scholar
  • Lions P-L (2006–2012) Théorie des jeux de champ moyen et applications. Cours du Collège de France. http://www.college-de-france.fr/default/EN/all/equder/audiovideo.jsp.Google Scholar
  • Mastrolia T (2017) Moral hazard in welfare economics: On the advantage of planner’s advices to manage employees’ actions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.01254.Google Scholar
  • Mishura Y, Veretennikov A (2016) Existence and uniqueness theorems for solutions of McKean-Vlasov stochastic equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.02212.Google Scholar
  • Mookherjee D (1984) Optimal incentive schemes with many agents. Rev. Econom. Stud. 51(3):433–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pham H (2016) Linear quadratic optimal control of conditional McKean-Vlasov equation with random coefficients and applications. Probab., Uncertainty Quant. Risk 1(7).Google Scholar
  • Pham H, Wei X (2015) Bellman equation and viscosity solutions for mean-field stochastic control problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.07866.Google Scholar
  • Pham H, Wei X (2016) Discrete time McKean-Vlasov control problem: A dynamic programming approach. Appl. Math. Optim. 74(3):487–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pham H, Wei X (2017) Dynamic programming for optimal control of stochastic McKean-Vlasov dynamics. SIAM J. Control and Optim. 55(2):1069–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Revuz D, Yor M (1999) Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 3rd ed., Vol. 293 (Springer).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schättler H, Sung J (1993) The first-order approach to the continuous-time principal-agent problem with exponential utility. J. Econom. Theory 61(2):331–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schättler H, Sung J (1997) On optimal sharing rules in discrete-and continuous-time principal-agent problems with exponential utility. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 21(2):551–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sung J (1995) Linearity with project selection and controllable diffusion rate in continuous-time principal-agent problems. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):720–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams N (2009) On dynamic principal-agent problems in continuous time. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  • Xing H, Žitković G (2018) A class of globally solvable Markovian quadratic BSDE systems and applications. Ann. Probab. 46(1):491–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.