On the Role of a Market Maker in Networked Cournot Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2018.0961

References

  • [1] Abolhassani M, Bateni MH, Hajiaghayi M, Mahini H, Sawant A (2014) Network Cournot competition. Liu TY, Qi Q, Ye Y, eds. Web and Internet Economics, WINE 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8877 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 15–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [2] Abreu D, Manea M (2012) Bargaining and efficiency in networks. J. Econom. Theory 147(1):43–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [3] Acemoglu D, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2009) Price and capacity competition. Games Econom. Behav. 66(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [4] Andersson B, Bergman L (1995) Market structure and the price of electricity: An ex ante analysis of the deregulated Swedish electricity market. Energy J. 16(2):97–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Anshelevich E, Sekar S (2015) Price competition in networked markets: How do monopolies impact social welfare? Markakis E, Schäfer G, eds. Web and Internet Economics, WINE 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9470 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 16–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Barquin J, Vazquez M (2008) Cournot equilibrium calculation in power networks: An optimization approach with price response computation. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 23(2):317–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [7] Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, and Ilkiliç R (2014) Cournot competition in networked markets. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC) (ACM, New York), 733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Borenstein S, Bushnell J (1999) An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California’s electricity industry. J. Indust. Econom. 47(3):285–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Börgers T, Krahmer D, Strausz R (2015) An Introduction to the Theory of Mechanism Design (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [10] Bose S, Cai DW, Low S and Wierman A (2014) The role of a market maker in networked cournot competition. Proc. 53rd IEEE Conf. Decision Control (CDC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 4479–4484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [11] Bulow JI, Geanakoplos JD, Klemperer PD (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. 93(3):488–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [12] Chawla S, Roughgarden T (2008) Bertrand competition in networks. Monien B, Schroeder UP, eds. Algorithmic Game Theory, SAGT 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4997 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 70–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [13] Condorelli D, Galeotti A (2012) Bilateral trading in networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):82–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [14] Elliott M (2015) Inefficiencies in networked markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 7(4):43–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [15] FERC (2013) JP Morgan unit agree to $410 million in penalties, disgorgement to ratepayers. Accessed November 8, 2018, https://www.ferc.gov/media/news-releases/2013/2013-3/07-30-13.asp#.W-OfX6ep3OQ.Google Scholar
  • [16] Fudenberg D, Levine D (1998) Learning in games. Eur. Econom. Rev. 42(3):631–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [17] Garg D, Narahari Y, Gujar S (2008) Foundations of mechanism design: A tutorial part 1-key concepts and classical results. Sadhana 33(2):83–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [18] Greenberg HJ (1996) Consistency, redundancy, and implied equalities in linear systems. Ann. Math. Artificial Intelligence 17(1):37–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [19] Guzmán CL (2011) Price competition on network. Working Paper 2011-04, Banco de México, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  • [20] Hobbs BF (2001) Linear complementarity models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and poolco power markets. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 16(2):194–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] Horn RA, Johnson CR (2012) Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [22] Ilkiliç R (2009) Cournot competition on a network of markets and firms. FEEM Working Paper No. 32.2009, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.Google Scholar
  • [23] Jeyakumar V, Lasserre JB, Li G, Phạm T (2015) Convergent semidefinite programming relaxations for global bilevel polynomial optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 26(1):753–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [24] Jing-Yuan W, Smeers Y (1999) Spatial oligopolistic electricity models with cournot generators and regulated transmission prices. Oper. Res. 47(1):102–112.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [25] Lã QD, Chew YH, Soong BH (2016) Potential Game Theory (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • [26] Lasserre JB (2009) Moments, Positive Polynomials and Their Applications (Imperial College Press, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [27] Ledvina A, Sircar R (2011) Bertrand and Cournot competition under asymmetric costs: Number of active firms in equilibrium. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  • [28] Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [29] Manea M (2011) Bargaining in stationary networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):2042–2080.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [30] Marden JR, Arslan G, Shamma JS (2009) Cooperative control and potential games. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics Part B: Cybernetics 39(6):1393–1407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [31] Marden JR, Young HP, Arslan G, Shamma JS (2009) Payoff-based dynamics for multiplayer weakly acyclic games. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(1):373–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [32] Metzler C, Hobbs BF, Pang JS (2003) Nash-cournot equilibria in power markets on a linearized dc network with arbitrage: Formulations and properties. Networks Spatial Econom. 3(2):123–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [33] Monderer D, Shapley LS (1996) Potential games. Games Econom. Behav. 14(1):124–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [34] Nava F (2015) Efficiency in decentralized oligopolistic markets. J. Econom. Theory 157:315–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [35] Nedić A, Ozdaglar A (2009) Subgradient methods for saddle-point problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 142(1):205–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [36] Neuhoff K, Barquin J, Boots MG, Ehrenmann A, Hobbs BF, Rijkers FA, Vazquez M (2005) Network-constrained cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: The devil is in the details. Energy Econom. 27(3):495–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [37] Neyman A (1997) Correlated equilibrium and potential games. Internat. J. Game Theory 26(2):223–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [38] Outrata J, Kocvara M, Zowe J (1998) Nonsmooth Approach to Optimization Problems with Equilibrium Constraints: Theory, Applications and Numerical Results. Pardalos PM, ed. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 28 (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [39] Pieper H (2001) Algorithms for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints with applications to deregulated electricity markets. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • [40] Ramos A, Ventosa M, Rivier M (1999) Modeling competition in electric energy markets by equilibrium constraints. Utilities Policy 7(4):233–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [41] Rosen JB (1965) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person games. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 33(3):520–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [42] Ruhi NA, Dvijotham K, Chen N, Wierman A (2018) Opportunities for price manipulation by aggregators in electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(6):5687–5698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [43] Schrijver A (1998) Theory of Linear and Integer Programming (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • [44] Scott TJ (1998) Hydro reservoir management for an electricity market with long-term contracts. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  • [45] Scott TJ, Read EG (1996) Modelling hydro reservoir operation in a deregulated electricity market. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 3(3–4):243–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [46] Shamma JS, Arslan G (2004) Unified convergence proofs of continuous-time fictitious play. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 49(7):1137–1141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [47] Shoham Y, Leyton-Brown K (2008) Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [48] Slade ME (1994) What does an oligopoly maximize? J. Indust. Econom. 42(1):45–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [49] Sweeney JL (2008) The California Electricity Crisis (Hoover Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • [50] Ventosa M, Baıllo A, Ramos A, Rivier M (2005) Electricity market modeling trends. Energy Policy 33(7):897–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [51] Willems B (2002) Modeling Cournot competition in an electricity market with transmission constraints. Energy J. 23(3):95–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [52] Willems B, Rumiantseva I, Weigt H (2009) Cournot versus supply functions: What does the data tell us? Energy Econom. 31(1):38–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [53] Xu Y, Cai D, Bose S, Wierman A (2017) On the efficiency of networked Stackelberg competition. Proc. 51st Annual Conf. Inform. Sci. Systems (CISS) (IEEE, Baltimore), 1–6.Google Scholar
  • [54] Yao J, Adler I, Oren SS (2008) Modeling and computing two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in a congested electricity network. Oper. Res. 56(1):34–47.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [55] Yao J, Oren S, Adler I (2004) Computing Cournot equilibria in two settlement electricity markets with transmission constraint. Proc. 37th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (CISS) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 9.Google Scholar
  • [56] Yao J, Oren S, Adler I (2007) Two-settlement electricity markets with price caps and cournot generation firms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(3):1279–1296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [57] Yao J, Willems B, Oren SS, Adler I (2005) Cournot equilibrium in price-capped two-settlement electricity markets. Proc. 38th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1530–1605.Google Scholar
  • [58] Young HP (2004) Strategic Learning and Its Limits (Oxford University Press, Oxford UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.