A Mean Field Competition
Published Online:27 Jun 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2018.0966
References
- [1] (2018) Analysis of a finite state many player game using its master equation. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56(5):3538–3568.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [2] (2016) A rank-based mean field game in the strong formulation. Electronic Comm. Probab. 21(72):1–12.Google Scholar
- [3] (2016) Mean field games with a dominating player. Appl. Math. Optim. 74(1):91–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [4] (2013) Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory, Springer Briefs in Mathematics (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [5] (2018) Optimal stopping in mean field games, an obstacle problem approach. J. Math. Pures Appl. 120:165–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [6] (2014) Racing under uncertainty: Boundary value problem approach. J. Econom. Theory 151:508–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [7] (2015) The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games. Working paper, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris.Google Scholar
- [8] (2018) Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications I (Springer International, Cham Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [9] (2018) Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II (Springer International, Cham Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [10] (2016) Finite state mean field games with major and minor players. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- [11] (2017) Mean field games of timing and models for bank runs. Appl. Math. Optim. 76(1):217–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [12] (2016) Contracting theory with competitive interacting agents. Working paper, Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, Champs-sur-Marne, France.Google Scholar
- [13] (2018) A tale of a principal and many, many agents. Math. Oper. Res. 44(2):440–467.Link, Google Scholar
- [14] (2016) Gambling in contests with random initial law. Ann. Appl. Probab. 26(1):186–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [15] (2016) Gambling in contests with regret. Math. Finance 26(3):674–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [16] (2013) Continuous time finite state mean field games. Appl. Math. Optim. 68(1):99–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [17] (1987) Dynamic R&D competition. Econom. J. 97(386):372–387.Google Scholar
- [18] (2011) Mean field games and applications. Paris-Princeton Lectures on Mathematical Finance 2010, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2003 (Springer, Berlin), 205–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [19] (1987) Racing with uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [20] (2004) A perpetual race to stay ahead. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(4):1065–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [21] (2010) Large-population LQG games involving a major player: The Nash certainty equivalence principle. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(5):3318–3353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [22] (2007) Large-population cost-coupled LQG problems with nonuniform agents: Individual-mass behavior and decentralized \epsilon-Nash equilibria. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 52(9):1560–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [23] (2006) Large population stochastic dynamic games: Closed-loop McKean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. Comm. Inform. Systems 6(3):221–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [24] (2008) Optimal multi-agent performance measures for team contracts. Math. Finance 18(4):649–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [25] (2006) Jeux à champ moyen. I. Le cas stationnaire. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343(9):619–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [26] (2006) Jeux à champ moyen. II. Horizon fini et contrôle optimal. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343(10):679–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [27] (2007) Mean field games. Japanese J. Math. 2(1):229–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [28] (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [29] (1997) Dynamic R&D competition with learning. RAND J. Econom. 28(4):751–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [30] (2011) Optimal dynamic contests. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
- [31] (2019) Particle systems with singular interaction through hitting times: Application in systemic risk modeling. Ann. Appl. Probab. 29(1):89–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [32] (2018) A mean field game of optimal stopping. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56(2):1206–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [33] (2010) On existence of rich Fubini extensions. Econom. Theory 45(1–2):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [34] (1982) A dynamic game of R and D: Patent protection and competitive behavior. Econometrica 50(3):671–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [35] (2013) Gambling in contests. J. Econom. Theory 148(5):2033–2048.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [36] (2016) Continuous time contests with private information. Math. Oper. Res. 41(3):1093–1107.Link, Google Scholar
- [37] (2012) Large systems of diffusions interacting through their ranks. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 122(4):1730–1747.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [38] (2006) The exact law of large numbers via Fubini extension and characterization of insurable risks. J. Econom. Theory 126(1):31–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [39] (2009) Individual risk and Lebesgue extension without aggregate uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 144(1):432–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [40] (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
- [41] (2015) Contest Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar

