A Mean Field Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2018.0966

References

  • [1] Bayraktar E, Cohen A (2018) Analysis of a finite state many player game using its master equation. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56(5):3538–3568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [2] Bayraktar E, Zhang Y (2016) A rank-based mean field game in the strong formulation. Electronic Comm. Probab. 21(72):1–12.Google Scholar
  • [3] Bensoussan A, Chau MHM, Yam SCP (2016) Mean field games with a dominating player. Appl. Math. Optim. 74(1):91–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [4] Bensoussan A, Frehse J, Yam SCP (2013) Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory, Springer Briefs in Mathematics (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Bertucci C (2018) Optimal stopping in mean field games, an obstacle problem approach. J. Math. Pures Appl. 120:165–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Cao D (2014) Racing under uncertainty: Boundary value problem approach. J. Econom. Theory 151:508–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [7] Cardaliaguet P, Delarue F, Lasry JM, Lions PL (2015) The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games. Working paper, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris.Google Scholar
  • [8] Carmona R, Delarue F (2018) Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications I (Springer International, Cham Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Carmona R, Delarue F (2018) Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II (Springer International, Cham Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [10] Carmona R, Wang P (2016) Finite state mean field games with major and minor players. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  • [11] Carmona R, Delarue F, Lacker D (2017) Mean field games of timing and models for bank runs. Appl. Math. Optim. 76(1):217–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [12] Elie R, Possamaï D (2016) Contracting theory with competitive interacting agents. Working paper, Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, Champs-sur-Marne, France.Google Scholar
  • [13] Elie R, Mastrolia T, Possamaï D (2018) A tale of a principal and many, many agents. Math. Oper. Res. 44(2):440–467.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [14] Feng H, Hobson D (2016) Gambling in contests with random initial law. Ann. Appl. Probab. 26(1):186–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [15] Feng H, Hobson D (2016) Gambling in contests with regret. Math. Finance 26(3):674–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [16] Gomes DA, Mohr J, Souza RR (2013) Continuous time finite state mean field games. Appl. Math. Optim. 68(1):99–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [17] Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1987) Dynamic R&D competition. Econom. J. 97(386):372–387.Google Scholar
  • [18] Guéant O, Lasry JM, Lions PL (2011) Mean field games and applications. Paris-Princeton Lectures on Mathematical Finance 2010, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2003 (Springer, Berlin), 205–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [19] Harris C, Vickers J (1987) Racing with uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [20] Hörner J (2004) A perpetual race to stay ahead. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(4):1065–1088.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] Huang M (2010) Large-population LQG games involving a major player: The Nash certainty equivalence principle. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(5):3318–3353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [22] Huang M, Caines PE, Malhamé RP (2007) Large-population cost-coupled LQG problems with nonuniform agents: Individual-mass behavior and decentralized \epsilon-Nash equilibria. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 52(9):1560–1571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [23] Huang M, Malhamé RP, Caines PE (2006) Large population stochastic dynamic games: Closed-loop McKean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. Comm. Inform. Systems 6(3):221–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [24] Koo HK, Shim G, Sung J (2008) Optimal multi-agent performance measures for team contracts. Math. Finance 18(4):649–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [25] Lasry JM, Lions PL (2006) Jeux à champ moyen. I. Le cas stationnaire. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343(9):619–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [26] Lasry JM, Lions PL (2006) Jeux à champ moyen. II. Horizon fini et contrôle optimal. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343(10):679–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [27] Lasry JM, Lions PL (2007) Mean field games. Japanese J. Math. 2(1):229–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [28] Lazear E, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [29] Malueg DA, Tsutsui SO (1997) Dynamic R&D competition with learning. RAND J. Econom. 28(4):751–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [30] Moscarini G, Smith L (2011) Optimal dynamic contests. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • [31] Nadtochiy S, Shkolnikov M (2019) Particle systems with singular interaction through hitting times: Application in systemic risk modeling. Ann. Appl. Probab. 29(1):89–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [32] Nutz M (2018) A mean field game of optimal stopping. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56(2):1206–1221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [33] Podczeck K (2010) On existence of rich Fubini extensions. Econom. Theory 45(1–2):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [34] Reinganum JF (1982) A dynamic game of R and D: Patent protection and competitive behavior. Econometrica 50(3):671–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [35] Seel C, Strack P (2013) Gambling in contests. J. Econom. Theory 148(5):2033–2048.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [36] Seel C, Strack P (2016) Continuous time contests with private information. Math. Oper. Res. 41(3):1093–1107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [37] Shkolnikov M (2012) Large systems of diffusions interacting through their ranks. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 122(4):1730–1747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [38] Sun Y (2006) The exact law of large numbers via Fubini extension and characterization of insurable risks. J. Econom. Theory 126(1):31–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [39] Sun Y, Zhang Y (2009) Individual risk and Lebesgue extension without aggregate uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 144(1):432–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [40] Taylor CR (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
  • [41] Vojnović M (2015) Contest Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.