Approximate Markov-Nash Equilibria for Discrete-Time Risk-Sensitive Mean-Field Games
Published Online:12 Aug 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2019.1044
References
- [1] (2015) Equilibria of dynamic games with many players: Existence, approximation, and market structure. J. Econom. Theory 156:269–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [2] (2006) Infinite Dimensional Analysis, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
- [3] (1997) Controlled Markov chains with discounted risk-sensitive criteria: Applications to machine replacement. Proc. 36th IEEE Conf. Decision Control, vol. 2 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1115–1120.Google Scholar
- [4] (2014) More risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Math. Oper. Res. 39(1):105–120.Link, Google Scholar
- [5] (2013) Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [6] (1999) Convergence of Probability Measures, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [7] (2015) Mean field games with ergodic cost for discrete time Markov processes. Preprint, submitted October 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08968.Google Scholar
- [8] (2007) Measure Theory, vol. II (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [9] (2015) Long time results for a weakly interacting particle system in discrete time. Stochastic Anal. Appl. 33(3):429–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [10] (2011) Notes on mean-field games. Working paper, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris.Google Scholar
- [11] (2013) Probabilistic analysis of mean-field games. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51(4):2705–2734.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [12] (1987) Discounted MDP’s: Distribution functions and exponential utility maximization. SIAM J. Control Optim. 25(1):49–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [13] (1996) Connections between stochastic control and dynamic games. Math. Control Signals Systems 9(4):303–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [14] (2016) Risk-sensitive mean-field type control under partial observation. Benth FE, Di Nunno G, eds. Stochastics of Environmental and Financial Economics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 243–263.Google Scholar
- [15] (2004) Real Analysis and Probability (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
- [16] (2013) Discrete time mean-field stochastic linear-quadratic optimal control problems. Automatica J. IFAC 49(11):3222–3233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [17] (2014) Mean field games models - a brief survey. Dynam. Games Appl. 4(2):110–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [18] (2010) Discrete time, finite state space mean field games. J. Math. Pures Appl. 93(3):308–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [19] (1996) Risk sensitive control of Markov processes in countable state space. Systems Control Lett. 29(3):147–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [20] (1996) Discrete-Time Markov Control Processes: Basic Optimality Criteria (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [21] (1972) Risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Management Sci. 18(7):356–369.Link, Google Scholar
- [22] (2010) Large-population LQG games involving major player: The Nash certainity equivalence principle. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(5):3318–3353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [23] (2007) Large-population cost coupled LQG problems with nonuniform agents: Individual-mass behavior and decentralizedε-Nash equilibria. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 52(9):1560–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [24] (2006) Large population stochastic dynamic games: Closed loop McKean-Vlasov sysyems and the Nash certainity equivalence principle. Comm. Inform. Systems 6(3):221–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [25] (2007) Average optimality for risk-sensitive control with general state space. Ann. Appl. Probab. 17(2):654–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [26] (1988) Anonymous sequential games. J. Math. Econom. 17(1):77–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [27] (1981) Convergence of dynamic programming models. Math. Oper. Res. 6(4):493–512.Link, Google Scholar
- [28] (2007) Mean field games. Japanese J. Math. 2(1):229–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [29] (2015) Discrete-time decentralized control using the risk-sensitive performance criterion in the large population regime: a mean field approach. 2015 Amer. Control Conf. (ACC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 4779–4784.Google Scholar
- [30] (2016) Discrete-time mean field Stackelberg games with a large number of followers. Proc. 2016 IEEE 55th Conf. Decision Control (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3578–3583.Google Scholar
- [31] (2016) Robust mean field games for coupled Markov jump linear systems. Internat. J. Control 89(7):1367–1381.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [32] (2017) Linear quadratic risk-sensitive and robust mean field games. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 62(3):1062–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [33] (2013) Linear-quadratic-Gaussian mean field games under high rate quantization. Proc. 52nd IEEE Conf. Decision Control (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1898–1903.Google Scholar
- [34] (1967) Probability Measures on Metric Spaces (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [35] (2019) Approximate Nash equilibria in partially observed stochastic games with mean-field interactions. Math. Oper. Res. 44(3):1006–1033.Google Scholar
- [36] (2018) Markov-Nash equilibria in mean-field games with discounted cost. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56(6):4256–4287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [37] (2016) Mean field game theory with a partially observed major agent. SIAM J. Control Optim. 54(6):3174–3224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [38] (2016) On mean field games and nonlinear filtering for agents with individual-state partial observations. 2016 American Control Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 4681–4686.Google Scholar
- [39] (1982) Convergence of Lebesgue integrals with varying measures. Sankhya Ser. A 44(3):380–402.Google Scholar
- [40] (2015) Risk-sensitive mean-field-type games with Lp-norm drifts. Automatica J. IFAC 59:224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [41] (2014) Risk-sensitive mean field games. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 59(4):835–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [42] (2009) Optimal Transport: Old and New (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar

