Intertemporal Choice with Continuity Constraints

References

• [1] Aliprantis CD , Border KC (2006) Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide , 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• [2] Asheim G (2010) Intergenerational equity. Annual Rev. Econom. 2(1):197–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [3] Attema A , Bleichrodt H , Rohde K , Wakker P (2010) Time trade-off sequences for analyzing discounting and time inconsistency. Management Sci. 56(11):2015–2030.Link, Google Scholar
• [4] Bleichrodt H , Rohde KIM , Wakker PP (2008) Koopman’s constant discounting for intertemporal choice: A simplification and a generalization. J. Math. Psych. 52(6):341–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [5] Chichilnisky G (1996) An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Soc. Choice Welfare 13(2):231–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [6] Chichilnisky G (1997) What is sustainable development? Land Econom. 73(4):467–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [7] Chichilnisky G , Heal G (1997) Social choice with infinite populations: Construction of a rule and impossibility results. Soc. Choice Welfare 14(2):303–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [8] Diamond PA (1965) The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33:170–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [9] Fishburn P , Edwards W (1997) Discount-neutral utility models for denumerable time streams. Theory Decision 43(2):139–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [10] Fishburn PC , Rubinstein A (1982) Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. 23(3):677–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [11] Folland GB (1984) Real Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• [12] Fremlin DH (2004) Measure Theory, Measure Algebras, vol. 3 (Torres Fremlin, Colchester, UK).Google Scholar
• [13] Hara K (2016) Characterization of stationary preferences in a continuous time framework. J. Math. Econom. 63:34–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [14] Harvey CM (1986) Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Sci. 32(9):1123–1139.Link, Google Scholar
• [15] Harvey CM , Østerdal LP (2012) Discounting models for outcomes over continuous time. J. Math. Econom. 48(5):284–294.Google Scholar
• [16] Hayashi T (2003) Quasi-stationary cardinal utility and present bias. J. Econom. Theory 112(2):343–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [17] Horn A , Tarski A (1948) Measures in Boolean algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 64:467–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [18] Kahneman D , Wakker PP , Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quart. J. Econ. 112(2):375–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [19] Köbberling V , Wakker PP (2003) Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: A generalized and simplified technique. Math. Oper. Res. 28(3):395–423.Link, Google Scholar
• [20] Kolmogorov AN , Fomīn SV (1975) Introductory Real Analysis (Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• [21] Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28:287–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [22] Koopmans TC (1972) Representation of preference orderings over time. McGuire CB, Radner R, eds. Decision and Organization (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 79–100.Google Scholar
• [23] Koopmans TC , Diamond PA , Williamson RE (1964) Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica 32:82–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [24] Kopylov I (2010) Simple axioms for countably additive subjective probability. J. Math. Econom. 46(5):867–876.Google Scholar
• [25] Lauwers L (2010) Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set. J. Math. Econom. 46(1):32–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [26] Lauwers L (2012) Intergenerational equity, efficiency, and constructibility. Econom. Theory 49(2):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [27] Meyer RF (1976) Preferences over time. Keeney RL, Raiffa H, eds., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 473–504.Google Scholar
• [28] Mirrlees J (1967) Optimum growth when technology is changing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 34:95–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [29] Montiel Olea JL , Strzalecki T (2014) Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econ. 129(3):1449–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [30] Pan J , Webb CS , Zank H (2015) An extension of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. Games Econom. Behav. 89:43–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [31] Phelps ES , Pollak RA (1968) On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Rev. Econom. Stud. 35(2):185–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [32] Pivato M , Vergopoulos V (2017) Measure and integration on Boolean algebras of regular open subsets in a topological space. Preprint, submitted March 7, http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02571.Google Scholar
• [33] Pivato M , Vergopoulos V (2020) Subjective expected utility with imperfect perception. J. Math. Econom. 88:104–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [34] Radó F , Baker JA (1987) Pexider’s equation and aggregation of allocations. Aequationes Math. 32:227–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [35] Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econom. J. (London) 38:543–559.Google Scholar
• [36] Sagara N (2013) Representation of preference orderings with an infinite horizon: Time-additive separable utility in continuous time. J. Internat. Econom. Stud. 27:3–22.Google Scholar
• [37] Sakai T (2016) Limit representations of intergenerational equity. Soc. Choice Welfare 47(2):481–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [38] Spinoza (1677) Ethics, Book 2, Proposition 44, Corollary 2.Google Scholar
• [39] Uzawa H (1968) Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings. Wolfe J, ed. Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honor of Sir John Hicks (University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh), 485–504.Google Scholar
• [40] Wakker P (1985) Continuous expected utility for arbitrary state spaces. Brucker P , Pauly R , eds., IX Symposium on Operations Research (Osnabrück, 1984) (Athenäum/Hain/Hanstein, Königstein), 113–129.Google Scholar
• [41] Wakker P (1988) The algebraic vs. the topological approach to additive representations. J. Math. Psych. 32(4):421–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [42] Wakker P (1989) Additive Representations of Preferences (Kluwer, Dordrecht).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [43] Wakker P (1991) Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. I. The algebraic approach. J. Math. Psych. 35(4):501–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [44] Wakker P (1993) Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. II. The topological approach. J. Math. Econom. 22:1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [45] Wakker P (1993) Unbounded utility for Savage’s “Foundations of statistics” and other models. Math. Oper. Res. 18(2):446–485.Link, Google Scholar
• [46] Webb CS (2016) Continuous quasi-hyperbolic discounting. J. Math. Econom. 64:99–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [47] Zame WR (2007) Can intergenerational equity be operationalized? Theoret. Econom. 2:187–202.Google Scholar