Time-Consistent Conditional Expectation Under Probability Distortion
Published Online:1 Mar 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2020.1101
References
- [1] (2020) Predictable forward performance processes: The binomial case. SIAM J. Control Optim. 58(1):327–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [2] (2017) A survey of time consistency of dynamic risk measures and dynamic performance measures in discrete time: LM-measure perspective. Probab. Uncertainty Quant. Risk 2:3.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [3] (2010) A general theory of Markovian time inconsistent stochastic control problems. Preprint, submitted September 17, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1694759.Google Scholar
- [4] (2014) Mean–variance portfolio optimization with state-dependent risk aversion. Math. Finance 24(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [5] (1992) User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 27(1):1–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [6] (2012) Better than dynamic mean-variance: Time inconsistency and free cash flow stream. Math. Finance 22(2):346–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [7] (2010) The golden rule when preferences are time inconsistent. Math. Financial Econom. 4(1):29–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [8] (2013) Time consistency of dynamic risk measures in markets with transaction costs. Quant. Finance 13(9):1473–1489.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [9] (2018) Time consistency for scalar multivariate risk measures. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04978.Google Scholar
- [10] (2019) Forward rank-dependent performance criteria: Time-consistent investment under probability distortion. Preprint, submitted April 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01745.Google Scholar
- [11] (2012) Time-inconsistent stochastic linear–quadratic control. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50(3):1548–1572.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [12] (2020) General stopping behaviors of naïve and noncommitted sophisticated agents, with application to probability distortion. Math. Finance 30(1):310–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [13] (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [14] (1998) Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
- [15] (2017) Dynamic approaches for some time-inconsistent optimization problems. Ann. Appl. Probab. 27(6):3435–3477.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [16] (2007) Investment and valuation under backward and forward dynamic exponential utilities in a stochastic factor model in Fu MC, Jarrow RA, Yen Ju-Yi J, Elliott RJ, eds. Advances in Mathematical Finance (Springer), 303–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [17] (2010) Stochastic partial differential equations and portfolio choice in Charella C, Novikov A, eds. Contemporary Quantitative Finance (Springer), 195–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [18] (1997) Backward SDE and related g-expectation. Karoui NE, Mazliak L, eds. Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (Longman, Harlow, UK), 141–160.Google Scholar
- [19] (2007) g-Brownian motion and dynamic risk measure under volatility uncertainty. Preprint, submitted November 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2834.Google Scholar
- [20] (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [21] (1955) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(3):165–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [22] (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [23] (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [24] (2000) A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. J. Risk Insurance 67(1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [25] (2012) Time-inconsistent optimal control problems and the equilibrium HJB equation. Math. Control Related Fields 2(3):271–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [26] (2010) Mathematicalising behavioural finance in Bhatia R, Pal A, Rangarajan G, Srivinvas V, Vanninathan M, eds. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010 (World Scientific, Singapore), 3185–3209.Google Scholar

