Optimal Monopoly Mechanisms with Demand Uncertainty

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2020.1120

References

  • [1] Bergemann D, Castro F, Weintraub G (2017) The scope of sequential screening with ex-post participation constraints. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 2078, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • [2] Bulow J, Roberts J (1989) The simple economics of optimal auctions. J. Political Econom. 97(5):1060–1090.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [3] Carroll G (2017) Robustness and separation in multidimensional screening. Econometrica 85(2):453–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [4] Crémer J, McLean RP (1985) Optimal selling strategies under uncertainty for a discriminating monopolist when demands are interdependent. Econometrica 53(2):345–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Crémer J, McLean RP (1988) Full extraction of the surplus in Bayesian and dominant strategy auctions. Econometrica 56(6):1247–1257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Daskalakis C, Papadimitriou C, Tzamos C (2016) Does information revelation improve revenue? Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 233–250.Google Scholar
  • [7] Gershkov A, Goeree JK, Kushnir A, Moldovanu B, Shi X (2013) On the equivalence of Bayesian and dominant strategy implementation. Econometrica 81(1):197–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Harris M, Raviv A (1981) A theory of monopoly pricing schemes with demand uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(3):347–365.Google Scholar
  • [9] Krähmer D, Strausz R (2015) Optimal sales contracts with withdrawal rights. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(2):762–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [10] Kushnir A (2015) On sufficiency of dominant strategy implementation in environments with correlated types. Econom. Lett. 133:4–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [11] Kushnir A, Liu S (2019) On the equivalence of Bayesian and dominant strategy implementation for environments with nonlinear utilities. Econom. Theory 67(3):617–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [12] Manelli AM, Vincent DR (2006) Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist. J. Econom. Theory 127(1):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [13] Manelli AM, Vincent DR (2007) Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):153–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [14] Manelli AM, Vincent DR (2010) Bayesian and dominant-strategy implementation in the independent private-values model. Econometrica 78(6):1905–1938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [15] Mookherjee D, Reichelstein S (1992) Dominant strategy implementation of Bayesian incentive compatible allocation rules. J. Econom. Theory 56(2):378–399.Google Scholar
  • [16] Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [17] Peck J (2017) Temporary boycotts as self-fulfilling disruptions of markets. J. Econom. Theory 169:1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [18] Peck J, Rampal J (2019) Non-optimality of state by state monopoly pricing with demand uncertainty: An example. Econom. Lett. 183:Article 108561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [19] Riley J, Zeckhauser R (1983) Optimal selling strategies: When to haggle, when to hold firm. Quart. J. Econom. 98(2):267–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [20] Segal I (2003) Optimal pricing mechanisms with unknown demand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):509–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] Wang R (1993) Auctions vs. posted-price selling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(4):838–851.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.