Discrete Choice Prox-Functions on the Simplex

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1136

References

  • [1] Ahipasaoglu SD, Li X, Natarajan K (2019) A convex optimization approach for computing correlated choice probabilities with many alternatives. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 64(1):190–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [2] Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse JF (1988) A representative customer theory of the logit model. Internat. Econom. Rev. 29(3):461–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [3] Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse JF (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [4] Bresnahan TF, Stern S, Trajtenberg M (1997) Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND J. Econom. 28:17–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Feng G, Li X, Wang Z (2017) On the relation between several discrete choice models. Oper. Res. 65(6):1516–1525.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Fosgerau M, Melo E, de Palma A, Shum M (2017) Discrete choice and rational inattention: A general equivalence result. Discussion Papers 17–26, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  • [7] Gale D, Klee V, Rockafellar RT (1968) Convex functions on convex polytopes. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 19(4):867–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Hofbauer J, Sandholm WH (2002) On the global convergence of stochastic fictitious play. Econometrica 70(6):2265–2294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Kakade S, Shalev-Shwartz S, Tewari A (2009) On the duality of strong convexity and strong smoothness: learning applications and matrix regularization. Technical report, Toyota Technological Institute, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • [10] Koppelman FS, Wen CH (2000) The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 34(2):75–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [11] Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econom. 74:132–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [12] McFadden D (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location. Karlquist A, Snickars F, Weibull J, eds. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (North Holland, Amsterdam), 72–77.Google Scholar
  • [13] McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Manski C, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Economic Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 198–272.Google Scholar
  • [14] Mishra V, Natarajan K, Tao H, Teo CP (2012) Choice prediction with semidefinite optimization when utilities are correlated. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 57(10):2450–2463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [15] Natarajan K, Song M, Teo CP (2009) Persistency model and its applications in choice modeling. Management Sci. 55(3):453–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [16] Nemirovsky AS, Yudin DB (1983) Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • [17] Nesterov Yu (2013) Primal-dual subgradient methods for convex problems. Math. Programming 120:221–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [18] Nesterov Yu (2018) Lectures on Convex Optimization (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [19] Nesterov Yu, Shikhman V (2015) Quasi-monotone subgradient methods for nonsmooth convex minimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 165:917–940.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [20] Nesterov Yu, Shikhman V (2016) Excessive revenue model of competitive markets. Mordukhovich BS, Reich S, Zaslavski AJ, eds. Nonlinear Analysis and Optimization. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 659 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI), 189–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] Norets A, Takahashi S (2013) On the surjectivity of the mapping between utilities and choice probabilities. Quant. Econom. 4(1):149–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [22] Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [23] Small KA (1987) A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 55(2):409–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [24] Train K (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [25] Wen CH, Koppelman FS (2001) The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 35(7):627–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.