Fair Cake Division Under Monotone Likelihood Ratios
Published Online:16 Dec 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1192
References
- [1] (2017) Envy-free mechanisms with minimum number of cuts. Proc. 31st AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- [2] (1987) Splitting necklaces. Adv. Math. 63(3):247–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [3] (2019) Fair and efficient cake division with connected pieces. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Web and Internet Economics (Springer, Berlin), 57–70.Google Scholar
- [4] (2001) Single crossing properties and the existence of pure strategy equilibria in games of incomplete information. Econometrica 69(4):861–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [5] (2013) Computing socially-efficient cake divisions. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems), 343–350.Google Scholar
- [6] (2016) A discrete and bounded envy-free cake cutting protocol for any number of agents. Proc. IEEE 57th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (IEEE, New York), 416–427.Google Scholar
- [7] (2012) Optimal proportional cake cutting with connected pieces. Proc. 26th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- [8] (1995) An envy-free cake division protocol. Amer. Math. Monthly 102(1):9–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [9] (1996) Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [10] (2017) The query complexity of cake cutting. Preprint, submitted May 8; revised July 13, 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02946.Google Scholar
- [11] (2002) Statistical Inference, vol. 2 (Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
- [12] (2012) On the computability of equitable divisions. Discrete Optim. 9(4):249–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [13] (2013) Truth, justice, and cake cutting. Games Econom. Behav. 77(1):284–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [14] (2011) Optimal envy-free cake cutting. Proc. 25th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- [15] (2012) Algorithmic solutions for envy-free cake cutting. Oper. Res. 60(6):1461–1476.Link, Google Scholar
- [16] (1961) How to cut a cake fairly. Amer. Math. Monthly 68(1P1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [17] (1967) Resource Allocation and the Public Sector, vol. 7 (Yale University, New Haven, CT), 45–98.Google Scholar
- [18] (1958) Puzzle-Math. (Viking Adult). http://www.worldcat.org/isbn/0670583359.Google Scholar
- [19] (1996) Majority voting with single-crossing preferences. J. Public Econom. 59(2):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [20] (2012) Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, vol. 2 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
- [21] (2020) Contiguous cake cutting: Hardness results and approximation algorithms. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 69:109–141.Google Scholar
- [22] (1991) Applications of likelihood ratio orderings in economics. Stochastic Orders and Decision under Risk. Lecture Notes Monograph Series, vol. 19 (Institute of Mathematical Sciences), 174–189.Google Scholar
- [23] (1979) The Nash social welfare function. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. (JSTOR) 47(2):423–435.Google Scholar
- [24] (2013) How to cut a cake before the party ends. Proc. 27th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- [25] (2001) An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and Its Applications, vol. 5. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
- [26] (2004) On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. Proc. 5th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 125–131.Google Scholar
- [27] (2010) Truthful fair division. Proc. Internat. Sympos. on Algorithmic Game Theory (Springer, Berlin), 288–299.Google Scholar
- [28] (2004) Fair Division and Collective Welfare (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- [29] (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 18(2):155–162.Google Scholar
- [30] (2016) Cake cutting algorithms (Chapter 13). Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD, eds. Handbook of Computational Social Choice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA), 311–332.Google Scholar
- [31] (1998) Cake-Cutting Algorithms: Be Fair if You Can (AK Peters/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [32] (2014) Log-concavity and strong log-concavity: A review. Statist. Surveys 8:45.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [33] (1948) The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16:101–104.Google Scholar
- [34] (1980) How to cut a cake fairly. Amer. Math. Monthly 87(8):640–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [35] (2008) Envy-free cake divisions cannot be found by finite protocols. Electronic J. Combinatorics 15(1):11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [36] (1999) Rental harmony: Sperner’s lemma in fair division. Amer. Math. Monthly 106(10):930–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [37] (2019) Cake cutting with single-peaked valuations. Proc. Internat. Conf. Combinatorial Optimization Applications (Springer, Berlin), 507–516.Google Scholar
- [38] (1985) Fair division of a measurable space. J. Math. Econom. 14(1):5–17.Crossref, Google Scholar

