Consumption Smoothing and Discounting in Infinite-Horizon, Discrete-Choice Problems

References

• [1] Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2010) Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey. J. Econometrics 156(1):38–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [2] Attema AE, Bleichrodt H, Gao Y, Huang Z, Wakker PP (2016) Measuring discounting without measuring utility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(6):1476–1494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [3] Backus DK, Routledge BR, Zin SE (2004) Exotic preferences for macroeconomists. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 19:319–390. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3585343?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [4] Bommier A, Kochov A, Le Grand F (2019) Ambiguity and endogenous discounting. J. Math. Econom. 83:48–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [5] De Vries M, Komornik V (2009) Unique expansions of real numbers. Adv. Math. 221(2):390–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [6] Debreu G (1954) Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical utility function. Thrall R, Coombs C, Davis R, eds. Decision Processes (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• [7] Diamond PA (1965) The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33(1):170–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [8] Epstein L (1983) Stationary cardinal utility and optimal growth under uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 31(1):133–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [9] Epstein LG, Hynes JA (1983) The rate of time preference and dynamic economic analysis. J. Political Econom. 91(4):611–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [10] Fudenberg D, Maskin E (1991) On the dispensability of public randomization in discounted repeated games. J. Econom. Theory 53(2):428–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [11] Kochov A (2017) A separation result for stationary preferences. J. Math. Econom. 70:123–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [12] Kochov A, Song Y (2021) Intertemporal hedging and trade in repeated games with recursive utility (August 25, 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2714337.Google Scholar
• [13] Koopmans T (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28(2):287–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [14] Koopmans T (1972) Representation of preference orderings over time. McGuire C, Radner R, eds. Decision and Organization (North Holland, Amsterdam), 79–100.Google Scholar
• [15] Lu J, Saito K (2020) Repeated choice: A theory of stochastic intertemporal preferences. Social science working paper, 1449. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (Unpublished). https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20200106-083810655.Google Scholar
• [16] Lucas R, Stokey N (1984) Optimal growth with many consumers. J. Econom. Theory 32(1):139–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [17] Mackenzie A (2019) A foundation for probabilistic beliefs with or without atoms. Theoret. Econom. 2(4):355–394.Google Scholar
• [18] Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• [19] Montiel Olea JL, Strzalecki T (2014) Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1449–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [20] Obara I, Park J (2013) Repeated games with general time preference. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• [21] Rényi A (1957) Representations for real numbers and their ergodic properties. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungarica 8(3):477–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [22] Sekiguchi T, Wakai K (2016) Repeated games with recursive utility: Cournot duopoly under gain/loss asymmetry. Technical report, Kyoto University, Japan.Google Scholar
• [23] Sorin S (1986) On repeated games with complete information. Math. Oper. Res. 11(1):147–160.Link, Google Scholar
• [24] Uzawa H (1968) Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings. Wolfe J, ed. Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks (Aldine, Chicago), 485–504.Google Scholar