Hölderian Error Bounds and Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz Inequality for the Trust Region Subproblem

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1243

References

  • [1] Artacho FA, Geoffroy MH (2008) Characterization of metric regularity of subdifferentials. J. Convex Anal. 15(2):365.Google Scholar
  • [2] Attouch H, Bolte J, Redont P, Soubeyran A (2010) Proximal alternating minimization and projection methods for nonconvex problems: An approach based on the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz inequality. Math. Oper. Res. 35(2):438–457.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [3] Beck A (2014) Introduction to Nonlinear Optimization: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications with MATLAB (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [4] Beck A, Vaisbourd Y (2018) Globally solving the trust region subproblem using simple first-order methods. SIAM J. Optim. 28(3):1951–1967.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust Optimization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Bertsekas DP (1999) Nonlinear Programming (Athena Scientific).Google Scholar
  • [7] Bolte J, Daniilidis A, Ley O, Mazet L (2010) Characterizations of Łojasiewicz inequalities: subgradient flows, talweg, convexity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362(6):3319–3363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Bolte J, Nguyen TP, Peypouquet J, Suter BW (2017) From error bounds to the complexity of first-order descent methods for convex functions. Math. Programming 165(2):471–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Burke JV, Ferris MC (1993) Weak sharp minima in mathematical programming. SIAM J. Control Optim. 31(5):1340–1359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [10] Carmon Y, Duchi JC (2018) Analysis of Krylov subspace solutions of regularized nonconvex quadratic problems. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 31:10705–10715.Google Scholar
  • [11] Conn AR, Gould NI, Toint PL (2000) Trust Region Methods (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [12] Cui Y, Ding C, Zhao X (2017) Quadratic growth conditions for convex matrix optimization problems associated with spectral functions. SIAM J. Optim. 27(4):2332–2355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [13] Cui Y, Sun D, Toh KC (2019) On the R-superlinear convergence of the KKT residuals generated by the augmented Lagrangian method for convex composite conic programming. Math. Programming 178(1):381–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [14] Dontchev AL, Rockafellar RT (2009) Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings, vol. 543 (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [15] Drusvyatskiy D, Lewis AS (2013) Tilt stability, uniform quadratic growth, and strong metric regularity of the subdifferential. SIAM J. Optim. 23(1):256–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [16] Drusvyatskiy D, Lewis AS (2018) Error bounds, quadratic growth, and linear convergence of proximal methods. Math. Oper. Res. 43(3):919–948.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [17] Drusvyatskiy D, Ioffe AD, Lewis AS (2021) Nonsmooth optimization using Taylor-like models: error bounds, convergence, and termination criteria. Math. Programming 185(1):357–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [18] Drusvyatskiy D, Mordukhovich BS, Nghia TT (2014) Second-order growth, tilt stability, and metric regularity of the subdifferential. J. Convex Anal. 21:1165–1192.Google Scholar
  • [19] Fabian MJ, Henrion R, Kruger AY, Outrata JV (2010) Error bounds: Necessary and sufficient conditions. Set-Valued Variance Anal. 18(2):121–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [20] Flippo OE, Jansen B (1996) Duality and sensitivity in nonconvex quadratic optimization over an ellipsoid. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 94(1):167–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] Fortin C, Wolkowicz H (2004) The trust region subproblem and semidefinite programming. Optim. Methods Software 19(1):41–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [22] Frankel P, Garrigos G, Peypouquet J (2015) Splitting methods with variable metric for Kurdyka–Łojasiewicz functions and general convergence rates. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 165(3):874–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [23] Gao B, Liu X, Chen X, Yuan YX (2016) On the Łojasiewicz exponent of the quadratic sphere constrained optimization problem. Preprint, submitted November 27, updated on November 29, 2016 and February 23, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08781.Google Scholar
  • [24] Ghadimi S, Lan G, Zhang H (2016) Mini-batch stochastic approximation methods for nonconvex stochastic composite optimization. Math. Programming 155(1-2):267–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [25] Gould NI, Lucidi S, Roma M, Toint PL (1999) Solving the trust-region subproblem using the Lanczos method. SIAM J. Optim. 9(2):504–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [26] Han D, Sun D, Zhang L (2018) Linear rate convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers for convex composite programming. Math. Oper. Res. 43(2):622–637.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [27] Hazan E, Koren T (2016) A linear-time algorithm for trust region problems. Math. Programming 158(1):363–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [28] Ho-Nguyen N, Kilinc-Karzan F (2017) A second-order cone based approach for solving the trust-region subproblem and its variants. SIAM J. Optim. 27(3):1485–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [29] Hou K, Zhou Z, So AMC, Luo ZQ (2013) On the linear convergence of the proximal gradient method for trace norm regularization. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS), 26:710–718.Google Scholar
  • [30] Ioffe A (2016) Metric regularity-a survey part 1. theory. J. Australian Math. Soc. 101(2):188–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [31] Jiang R, Li D (2019) Novel reformulations and efficient algorithms for the generalized trust region subproblem. SIAM J. Optim. 29(2):1603–1633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [32] Jiang R, Li D (2020) A linear-time algorithm for generalized trust region subproblems. SIAM J. Optim. 30(1):915–932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [33] Jiang R, Li D, Wu B (2018) SOCP reformulation for the generalized trust region subproblem via a canonical form of two symmetric matrices. Math. Programming 169(2):531–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [34] Li W (1995) Error bounds for piecewise convex quadratic programs and applications. SIAM J. Control Optim. 33(5):1510–1529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [35] Li G, Pong TK (2016) Douglas–Rachford splitting for nonconvex optimization with application to nonconvex feasibility problems. Math. Programming 159(1):371–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [36] Li G, Pong TK (2018) Calculus of the exponent of Kurdyka–Łojasiewicz inequality and its applications to linear convergence of first-order methods. Foundations Comput. Math. 18(5):1199–1232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [37] Li M, Meng K, Yang X (2018) On error bound moduli for locally Lipschitz and regular functions. Math. Programming 171(1):463–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [38] Li G, Mordukhovich BS, Pham T (2015) New fractional error bounds for polynomial systems with applications to Hölderian stability in optimization and spectral theory of tensors. Math. Programming 153(2):333–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [39] Liu H, So AMC, Wu W (2019) Quadratic optimization with orthogonality constraint: Explicit Łojasiewicz exponent and linear convergence of retraction-based line-search and stochastic variance-reduced gradient methods. Math. Programming 178(1):215–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [40] Liu H, Wu W, So AMC (2016) Quadratic optimization with orthogonality constraints: Explicit Łojasiewicz exponent and linear convergence of line-search methods. Balcan MF, Weinberger KQ, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn., vol. 48 (PMLR, New York),1158–1167.Google Scholar
  • [41] Lojasiewicz S (1963) Une propriété topologique des sous-ensembles analytiques réels. Équations Dérivées Partielles 117:87–89.Google Scholar
  • [42] Łojasiewicz S (1993) Sur la géométrie semi-et sous-analytique. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 43:1575–1595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [43] Luo ZQ, Sturm JF (2000) Error bounds for quadratic systems. High Performance Optimization (Springer, Berlin), 383–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [44] Luo ZQ, Tseng P (1992a) Error bound and convergence analysis of matrix splitting algorithms for the affine variational inequality problem. SIAM J. Optim. 2(1):43–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [45] Luo ZQ, Tseng P (1992b) On the linear convergence of descent methods for convex essentially smooth minimization. SIAM J. Control Optim. 30(2):408–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [46] Luo ZQ, Tseng P (1993) Error bounds and convergence analysis of feasible descent methods: a general approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 46(1):157–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [47] Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [48] Martínez JM (1994) Local minimizers of quadratic functions on Euclidean balls and spheres. SIAM J. Optim. 4(1):159–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [49] Moré JJ (1993) Generalizations of the trust region problem. Optim. Methods Software 2(3-4):189–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [50] Moré JJ, Sorensen DC (1983) Computing a trust region step. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 4(3):553–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [51] Nesterov Y (2003) Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization: A Basic Course, vol. 87 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • [52] Pang JS (1997) Error bounds in mathematical programming. Math. Programming 79(1):299–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [53] Poliquin R, Rockafellar R (1996) Prox-regular functions in variational analysis. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348(5):1805–1838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [54] Pong TK, Wolkowicz H (2014) The generalized trust region subproblem. Comput. Optim. Appl. 58(2):273–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [55] Rendl F, Wolkowicz H (1997) A semidefinite framework for trust region subproblems with applications to large scale minimization. Math. Programming 77(1):273–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [56] So AMC, Zhou Z (2017) Non-asymptotic convergence analysis of inexact gradient methods for machine learning without strong convexity. Optim. Methods Software 32(4):963–992.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [57] Wang T, Pang JS (1994) Global error bounds for convex quadratic inequality systems. Optimization 31(1):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [58] Wang J, Xia Y (2017) A linear-time algorithm for the trust region subproblem based on hidden convexity. Optim. Lett. 11(8):1639–1646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [59] Wang J, Xia Y (2020) Closing the gap between necessary and sufficient conditions for local nonglobal minimizer of trust region subproblem. SIAM J. Optim. 30(3):1980–1995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [60] Yakubovich V (1997) S-procedure in nonlinear control theory. Vestnick Leningrad Univ. Math. 4:73–93.Google Scholar
  • [61] Yuan Yx (2015) Recent advances in trust region algorithms. Math. Programming 151(1):249–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [62] Zhang LH, Shen C (2018) A nested Lanczos method for the trust-region subproblem. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40(4):2005–2032.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [63] Zhang H, Conn AR, Scheinberg K (2010) A derivative-free algorithm for least-squares minimization. SIAM J. Optim. 20(6):3555–3576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [64] Zhang LH, Shen C, Li RC (2017) On the generalized Lanczos trust-region method. SIAM J. Optim. 27(3):2110–2142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [65] Zhang H, Milzarek A, Wen Z, Yin W (2021) On the geometric analysis of a quartic–quadratic optimization problem under a spherical constraint. Math. Programming 1–53.Google Scholar
  • [66] Zhou Z, So AMC (2017) A unified approach to error bounds for structured convex optimization problems. Math. Programming 165(2):689–728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [67] Zhou Z, Zhang Q, So AMC (2015) ℓ1,p-norm regularization: Error bounds and convergence rate analysis of first-order methods. Bach F, Blei D, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn., vol. 37 (PMLR, Lille, France), 1501–1510.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.