Dynamic Pricing Provides Robust Equilibria in Stochastic Ridesharing Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2022.0163

References

  • [1] Afeche P, Liu Z, Maglaras C (2018) Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. Preprint, submitted February 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3120544.Google Scholar
  • [2] Artelys (2023) Knitro. Accessed May 29, 2023, http://www.artelys.com/knitro/.Google Scholar
  • [3] Banerjee S, Freund D, Lykouris T (2017) Pricing and optimization in shared vehicle systems: An approximation framework. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 517.Google Scholar
  • [4] Banerjee S, Johari R, Riquelme C (2016) Dynamic pricing in ridesharing platforms. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 15(1):65–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2022) Spatial capacity planning. Oper. Res. 70(2):1271–1291.Google Scholar
  • [6] Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Google Scholar
  • [7] Borwein J, Lewis A (2006) Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Braverman A, Dai JG, Liu X, Ying L (2019) Empty-car routing in ridesharing systems. Oper. Res. 67(5):1437–1452.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Castillo JC, Knoepfle D, Weyl G (2017) Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 241–242.Google Scholar
  • [10] Castro F, Ma H, Nazerzadeh H, Yan C (2022) Randomized FIFO mechanisms. Proc. 23rd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 60.Google Scholar
  • [11] Chung H, Freund D, Shmoys DB (2018) Bike angels: An analysis of Citi Bike’s incentive program. Proc. First ACM SIGCAS Conf. Comput. Sustainable Soc. (ACM, New York), 5:1–5:9.Google Scholar
  • [12] Fleischer L, Jain K, Mahdian M (2004) Tolls for heterogeneous selfish users in multicommodity networks and generalized congestion games. 45th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 277–285.Google Scholar
  • [13] Freund D, van Ryzin G (2021) Pricing fast and slow: Limitations of dynamic pricing mechanisms in ride-hailing. Preprint, submitted September 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3931844.Google Scholar
  • [14] Garg N, Nazerzadeh H (2021) Driver surge pricing. Management Sci. 68(5):3219–3235.Google Scholar
  • [15] Karakostas G, Kolliopoulos S (2004) Edge pricing of multicommodity networks for heterogeneous selfish users. Proc. 45th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 268–276.Google Scholar
  • [16] Lu A, Frazier PI, Kislev O (2018) Surge pricing moves Uber’s driver-partners. Proc. 2018 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 3.Google Scholar
  • [17] Ma H, Fang F, Parkes DC (2021) Spatio-temporal pricing for ridesharing platforms. Oper. Res. 70(2):1025–1041.Google Scholar
  • [18] Mittelmann H (2023) Benchmarks for optimization software: AMPL-NLP benchmark. Accessed May 29, 2023, http://plato.asu.edu/ftp/ampl-nlp.html.Google Scholar
  • [19] Özkan E, Ward AR (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ride sharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [20] Prékopa A (2013) Stochastic Programming, vol. 324 (Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • [21] Yan C, Zhu H, Korolko N, Woodard D (2020) Dynamic pricing and matching in ride-hailing platforms. Naval Res. Logist. 67(8):705–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [22] Yu C, Ma H, Wierman A (2022) Price cycles in ridesharing platforms. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:246863471.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.