The Competition Complexity of Dynamic Pricing
References
- [1] (2017) Beating 1-1/e for ordered prophets. Proc. 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 61–71.Google Scholar
- [2] (2015) Optimal auctions vs. anonymous pricing. 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 1446–1463.Google Scholar
- [3] (2019) Optimal (and benchmark-optimal) competition complexity for additive buyers over independent items. Proc. 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 686–696.Google Scholar
- [4] (1996) Auctions vs. negotiations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(1):180–194.Google Scholar
- [5] (2007) Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations. Proc. 2007 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 243–251.Google Scholar
- [6] (2010) Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. Proc. 42nd Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 311–320.Google Scholar
- [7] (2022) A semester virtual institute. Blog@CACM. Accessed September 2021, https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/258538-a-semester-virtual-institute/fulltext.Google Scholar
- [8] (2019) Prophet inequalities for I.I.D. random variables from an unknown distribution. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 3–17.Google Scholar
- [9] (2019b) From pricing to prophets, and back! Oper. Res. Lett. 47(1):25–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [10] (2021) Posted price mechanisms and optimal threshold strategies for random arrivals. Math. Oper. Res. 46(4):1452–1478.Link, Google Scholar
- [11] (2016) Revenue gaps for discriminatory and anonymous sequential posted pricing. Preprint, submitted July 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07105.Google Scholar
- [12] (2020) An O(log log m) prophet inequality for subadditive combinatorial auctions. 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 306–317.Google Scholar
- [13] (2017) Prophet inequalities made easy: Stochastic optimization by pricing non-stochastic inputs. 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 540–551.Google Scholar
- [14] (2017) The competition complexity of auctions: A Bulow-Klemperer result for multi-dimensional bidders. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 343.Google Scholar
- [15] (2018) 99% revenue via enhanced competition. Proc. 2018 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 443–460.Google Scholar
- [16] (2015) Combinatorial auctions via posted prices. Proc. 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 123–135.Google Scholar
- [17] (1966) Recognizing the maximum of a sequence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61(313):35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [18] (2007) Automated mechanism design and prophet inequalities. Proc. 22nd National Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1 (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 58–65.Google Scholar
- [19] (2020) Mechanism design and approximation. Accessed December 2021, https://jasonhartline.com/MDnA/.Google Scholar
- [20] (2009) Simple vs. optimal mechanisms. Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 225–234.Google Scholar
- [21] (1982) Comparisons of stop rule and supremum expectations of i.i.d. random variables. Ann. Probab. 10(2):336–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [22] (2021) Tight revenue gaps among multi-unit mechanisms. Proc. 22nd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 654–673.Google Scholar
- [23] (2019) Tight revenue gaps among simple mechanisms. Proc. 30th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 209–228.Google Scholar
- [24] (2019) Tight approximation ratio of anonymous pricing. Proc. 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 674–685.Google Scholar
- [25] (1986) Stop rule and supremum expectations of i.i.d. random variables: A complete comparison by conjugate duality. J. Multivariate Anal. 19(1):88–112.Google Scholar
- [26] (2018) Delegated search approximates efficient search. Proc. 2018 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 287–302.Google Scholar
- [27] (2012) Matroid prophet inequalities. Proc. 44th Annual ACM SIGACT Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 123–136.Google Scholar
- [28] (2021) Variable decomposition for prophet inequalities and optimal ordering. Proc. 22nd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 692.Google Scholar
- [29] (2018) On the competition complexity of dynamic mechanism design. Proc. 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 2008–2025.Google Scholar
- [30] (1956) On a problem of Cayley. Scripta Math. 22:289–292.Google Scholar
- [31] (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
- [32] (1893) Sur l’application des méthodes d’approximations successives à l’étude de certaines équations différentielles ordinaires. J. Math. Pures Appl. 9:217–272.Google Scholar
- [33] (2018) Combinatorial optimization under uncertainty: Probing and stopping-time algorithms. Unpublished PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

