Opinion Dynamics on Directed Complex Networks

References

• [1] Abelson RP (1964) Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. Frederiksen N, Gulliksen H, eds. Contributions to Mathematical Psychology (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., New York), 1–54.Google Scholar
• [2] Aldous DJ, Bandyopadhyay A (2005) A survey of max-type recursive distributional equation. Ann. Appl. Probab. 15(2):1047–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [3] Aldous D, Steele JM (2004) The objective method: Probabilistic combinatorial optimization and local weak convergence. Kesten H, ed. Probability on Discrete Structures. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 110 (Springer, Berlin), 1–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [4] Alsmeyer G, Meiners M (2012) Fixed points of inhomogeneous smoothing transforms. J. Difference Equ. Appl. 18(8):1287–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [5] Alsmeyer G, Biggins JD, Meiners M (2012) The functional equation of the smoothing transform. Ann. Probab. 40(5):2069–2105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [6] Auletta V, Fanelli A, Ferraioli D (2019) Consensus in opinion formation processes in fully evolving environments. Proc. Conf. AAAI Artificial Intelligence 33(01):6022–6029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [7] Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic LA (2015) Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239):1130–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [8] Baron RS, Hoppe SI, Kao CF, Brunsman B, Linneweh B, Rogers D (1996) Social corroboration and opinion extremity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 32(6):537–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [9] Berger RL (1981) A necessary and sufficient condition for reaching a consensus using DeGroot’s method. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76(374):415–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [10] Canuto C, Fagnani F, Tilli P (2012) An Eulerian approach to the analysis of Krause’s consensus models. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50(1):243–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [11] Carro A, Toral R, Miguel MS (2013) The role of noise and initial conditions in the asymptotic solution of a bounded confidence, continuous-opinion model. J. Statist. Phys. 151(1):131–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [12] Dandekar P, Goel A, Lee DT (2013) Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(15):5791–5796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [13] Deffuant G, Neau D, Amblard F, Weisbuch G (2000) Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Systems 3(01n04):87–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [14] DeGroot MH (1974) Reaching a consensus. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69(345):118–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [15] Diaconis P, Freedman D (1999) Iterated random functions. SIAM Rev. 41(1):45–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [16] DiMaggio P, Evans J, Bryson B (1996) Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):690–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [17] Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [18] Fraiman N, Lin T, Olvera-Cravioto M (2023) Stochastic recursions on directed random graphs. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 166:104055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [19] French JRP Jr (1956) A formal theory of social power. Psych. Rev. 63(3):181–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [20] Friedkin NE (2011) A formal theory of reflected appraisals in the evolution of power. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(4):501–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [21] Friedkin NE, Johnsen EC (1990) Social influence and opinions. J. Math. Sociol. 15(3–4):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [22] Garimella K, Morales GDF, Gionis A, Mathioudakis M (2018) Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. Proc. 2018 World Wide Web Conf., 913–922.Google Scholar
• [23] Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002) Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulation 5(3).Google Scholar
• [24] Jia P, MirTabatabaei A, Friedkin NE, Bullo F (2015) Opinion dynamics and the evolution of social power in influence networks. SIAM Rev. 57(3):367–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [25] Konovalchikova E, Dorofeeva YA (2020) Opinion dynamics models with noise. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2792(2):176–190.Google Scholar
• [26] Lacker D, Ramanan K, Wu R (2023a) Local weak convergence for sparse networks of interacting processes. Ann. Appl. Probab. 33(2):843–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [27] Lacker D, Ramanan K, Wu R (2023b) Marginal dynamics of interacting diffusions on unimodular Galton-Watson trees. Probab. Theory Related Fields 187(3–4):817–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [28] Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(11):2098–2109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [29] Mackin E, Patterson S (2019) Maximizing diversity of opinion in social networks. 2019 Amer. Control Conf. (ACC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2728–2734.Google Scholar
• [30] Mirtabatabaei A, Bullo F (2011) On opinion dynamics in heterogeneous networks. Proc. 2011 Amer. Control Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2807–2812.Google Scholar
• [31] Munro GD, Ditto PH, Lockhart LK, Fagerlin A, Gready M, Peterson E (2002) Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: Evaluating the 1996 US presidential debate. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 24(1):15–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [32] Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [33] Olvera-Cravioto M (2022) Strong couplings for static locally tree-like random graphs. J. Appl. Probab. 59(4):1261–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [34] Parsegov SE, Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R, Friedkin NE (2016) Novel multidimensional models of opinion dynamics in social networks. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 62(5):2270–2285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [35] Pineda M, Toral R, Hernandez-Garcia E (2009) Noisy continuous-opinion dynamics. J. Statist. Mech. Theory Experiment 2009(08):P08001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [36] Proskurnikov AV, Matveev AS, Cao M (2015) Opinion dynamics in social networks with hostile camps: Consensus vs. polarization. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 61(6):1524–1536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [37] Ravazzi C, Frasca P, Tempo R, Ishii H (2014) Ergodic randomized algorithms and dynamics over networks. IEEE Trans. Control Network Systems 2(1):78–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [38] Rey SI, Reyes P, Silva A (2017) Evolution of social power for opinion dynamics networks. 2017 55th Annual Allerton Conf. Comm. Control Comput. (Allerton) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 716–723.Google Scholar
• [39] Semonsen J, Griffin C, Squicciarini A, Rajtmajer S (2018) Opinion dynamics in the presence of increasing agreement pressure. IEEE Trans. Cybernetics 49(4):1270–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [40] Stern S, Livan G (2021) The impact of noise and topology on opinion dynamics in social networks. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 8(4):201943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [41] van der Hofstad R (2017) Random Graphs and Complex Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [42] van der Hofstad R (2024) Random Graphs and Complex Networks, vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [43] Weisbuch G (2004) Bounded confidence and social networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 38(2):339–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [44] Xiao L, Boyd S, Kim SJ (2007) Distributed average consensus with least-mean-square deviation. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 67(1):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [45] Yang M, Qu X, Cao Z, Yang X (2017) Innovation governs everything eventually: Extensions of the DeGroot model. Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser. 33(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [46] Ye M, Liu J, Anderson BDO, Yu C, Başar T (2017) On the analysis of the DeGroot-Friedkin model with dynamic relative interaction matrices. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):11902–11907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [47] Zhao Y, Zhang L, Tang M, Kou G (2016) Bounded confidence opinion dynamics with opinion leaders and environmental noises. Comput. Oper. Res. 74:205–213.Crossref, Google Scholar